You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 2651398


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 2651398

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,086,047 Dec 16, 2031 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
10,960,052 Dec 16, 2031 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
11,382,957 Dec 16, 2031 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
9,278,123 Dec 16, 2031 Novo RYBELSUS semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Patent SI2651398

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

The Slovenian patent SI2651398 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention granted under Slovenia's national patent system. As the country is a member of the European Patent Organization, Slovenian patent law aligns closely with European standards, providing robust protection for innovative drug inventions. This analysis explores the scope and claims of SI2651398, deciphering its technological focus, claim breadth, and its position within the global patent landscape.


Patent Scope and Technical Field

SI2651398 is primarily directed toward a novel pharmacological compound, formulation, or method, depending on the patent's detailed description. While the specific chemical entity or therapeutic area is not explicitly disclosed here, patents in this domain typically cover:

  • Chemical compounds with specific molecular structures or functional groups.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the active ingredient and carriers.
  • Methods of treatment involving the administration of the compound to achieve therapeutic effects.
  • Manufacturing processes for the novel compound or formulation.

The scope is generally defined by the nature of the claims, which delineate the boundaries of patent protection against potential infringers. The claims must strike a balance: broad enough to cover potential variants and applications but specific enough to meet patentability criteria of novelty and inventive step.


Claim Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core claims likely define:

  • The chemical entity or composition: Covering the structural formula of the compound or the unique combination of ingredients in a formulation.
  • The method of use: Step-by-step procedures for administering the drug for specific indications.
  • Manufacturing process: Steps involved in synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.

Such claims set the foundation of the patent, establishing the inventor’s exclusive rights. Their typical structure emphasizes the novel structural features or inventive method steps.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, such as:

  • Particular salts, esters, or derivatives of the core compound.
  • Dose ranges, formulations (e.g., tablets, injections), or delivery systems.
  • Specific therapeutic indications or combination therapies.

Dependent claims serve to reinforce the patent’s defense by covering various embodiments, thus reducing the risk of workarounds by competitors.


Scope of Protection

The scope hinges on claim language:

  • Broad claims: Encompass a wide class of compounds or methods, potentially providing extensive market protection. However, overly broad claims risk invalidation if they lack sufficient specificity or novelty.
  • Narrow claims: Focused on a specific compound or application, with higher validity but limited market coverage.

In practice, patent applicants aim for a hybrid approach, including broad independent claims supported by narrower, strategically crafted dependent claims.

Claim Strategy and Patent Strength

The strength of SI2651398’s claims depends on:

  • Novelty: The claimed invention must be new, not disclosed in prior art, including existing patents, scientific literature, or public disclosures.
  • Inventive step: The invention must exhibit non-obviousness over prior art, requiring a significant inventive contribution.
  • Industrial applicability: The claims must pertain to a subject-matter capable of industrial application, which is straightforward for pharmaceutical inventions.

Given Slovenia’s adherence to European patent standards, the patent’s claims should meet these rigorous criteria, positioning it as a defensible patent within the regional landscape.


Patent Landscape Context in Slovenia and Europe

1. National and Regional Patent Environment

  • Slovenia’s patent system: Allows direct national patent filings and is integrated with the European Patent Office (EPO) system, facilitating strategic European patent protection.
  • European Patent Office (EPO): Many drug patents filed in Slovenia are counterparts to European applications, often sharing claims or building upon European priority filings.

2. Patent Families and Priority

  • It is common for innovative pharmaceutical patents to be part of a patent family, filed in multiple jurisdictions to secure broad geographic coverage.
  • The SI2651398 patent could be part of a broader family protecting the same invention across Europe and worldwide, increasing market exclusivity.

3. Competitive Landscape

  • The patent landscape in Slovenia is competitive, with active filings from major pharmaceutical firms and biotech companies.
  • Patents covering similar compounds or mechanisms rapidly emerge; therefore, the novelty and inventive step of SI2651398 are critical to maintain market exclusivity.

4. Patent Challenges in the Sector

  • The pharmaceutical patent landscape is rife with litigation, oppositions, and patent term challenges, especially around claims that may overlap with existing patents or prior art.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent validity and potential third-party oppositions is essential to safeguard the patent’s enforceability.

Strategic Implications of the Patent

  • The patent’s scope directly impacts licensing opportunities, partnership negotiations, and market exclusivity.
  • Broad claims favor near-term market protection but may face challenges based on prior art. Narrow claims may limit scope but afford stronger validity.
  • The geographic coverage facilitated by Slovenia’s national system and European Patent conventions underpins strategic patent portfolio growth in the region.

Conclusion

SI2651398 exemplifies a typical innovative pharmaceutical patent targeting a specific chemical or therapeutic innovation. Its strength relies on well-crafted claims balancing breadth and validity, underpinning its potential to secure market exclusivity in Slovenia and beyond. The patent landscape in the region is dynamic; adherence to robust patent prosecution strategies is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage and protecting significant R&D investments.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims of SI2651398 are fundamental to determine its protected scope; precise, inventive, and well-supported claims provide a solid barrier against infringement.
  • A comprehensive claim strategy should balance broad protection with defensibility, considering prior art and potential legal challenges.
  • The patent landscape in Slovenia and Europe favors innovative drugs that feature unique compounds or methods, emphasizing the importance of detailed, specific claims.
  • Leveraging patent families and regional filings can maximize market coverage and shield against competitor entry.
  • Ongoing patent analytics are essential, as the pharmaceutical sector is highly litigated; proactive opposition or invalidation strategies safeguard patent rights.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims influence a drug patent’s market exclusivity?
A1: Broader claims cover more variants and uses, potentially leading to extended market exclusivity, but they must be valid and defensible. Narrower claims are easier to defend but limit the scope of protection.

Q2: What factors determine if a pharmaceutical patent like SI2651398 will survive legal challenges?
A2: Its validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, clarity, and industrial applicability. Challengers may scrutinize prior art or argue obviousness, so well-drafted claims and thorough patent prosecution are vital.

Q3: How do Slovenia’s patent laws compare to broader European standards?
A3: Slovenia’s patent law aligns with the European Patent Convention, ensuring similar standards for patentability, procedural requirements, and enforcement.

Q4: Can SI2651398 be extended or maintained beyond its initial term?
A4: Patents are usually granted for 20 years from filing; supplementary protection certificates may extend exclusivity for pharmaceuticals, contingent on specific conditions.

Q5: What strategies can patentees employ to strengthen their patent position in Slovenia?
A5: They should file multiple regional and international applications, craft precise claims, conduct thorough prior art searches, and monitor competitors’ filings for potential infringements or oppositions.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2022). Guidelines for Examination.
  2. Slovenian Intellectual Property Office. (2022). Patent Law and Procedures.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Gurry, F. (2020). Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies. Journal of Patent Law.
  5. European Patent Office. (2023). Patentability of Pharmaceutical Inventions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.