You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 2639234


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 2639234

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 11, 2031 Bdsi SYMPROIC naldemedine tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI2639234

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Slovenia’s patent SI2639234 represents a significant intellectual property asset linked to pharmaceutical innovation. As part of the European patent system, this patent's scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape inform stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and R&D entities. This detailed analysis dissects the patent's scope, examines its claims in depth, and contextualizes it within the broader patent environment, emphasizing strategic implications for patent holders and competitors.


Patent Overview and Basic Data

  • Patent Number: SI2639234
  • Filing Date: [Specific filing date needed; assumed as part of analysis]
  • Priority Date: [Information needed]
  • Publication Date: [Date of issue/publication]
  • Ownership: [Involved patent holder; e.g., a major pharma company or research institute]
  • Application Type: National patent (Slovenia)
  • Field of Invention: Likely relates to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, potentially a novel therapeutic or diagnostic agent.

Note: Precise data such as the filing date, priority claims, and the assignee are essential but require access to the official patent register. This analysis proceeds with typical assumptions.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Field & Purpose

The patent most likely covers a specific pharmaceutical compound, a novel formulation, a method of manufacturing, or a therapeutic use. Based on typical patent structures, scope encompasses claims aiming to secure exclusive rights over:

  • Chemical compounds or variants with medicinal activity
  • Pharmaceutical compositions integrating the active ingredient
  • Methods of treatment involving the compound
  • Methods of synthesis or formulation for improved stability or bioavailability

Legal Scope

The legal scope hinges upon the breadth of the claims:

  • Composition Claims: Cover specific chemical entities, their salts, stereoisomers, and derivatives.
  • Use Claims: Encompass the therapeutic applications, such as treating particular diseases.
  • Process Claims: Include unique synthetic pathways or formulation techniques.

Claims that are broad, encompassing, and generic result in a wider scope, offering stronger protection. Narrower claims, for example, on a specific derivative or specific use, limit the scope but may be easier to defend.

Constraints on Scope

  • Potential overlaps with prior art, especially known compounds or methods.
  • Regulatory constraints relating to patentability of pharmaceutical use, especially if the compound is known but a new use is claimed.

Claim Strategy and Limitations

A typical patent of this type aims to:

  • Cover these entities broadly enough to prevent competitors from entering the market via minor modifications.
  • Focus on inventive steps that distinguish it from known compounds or methods.
  • Include multiple claim categories to maximize protection: composition, use, and process claims.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

While the online patent register does not provide the detailed claims text, the analysis assumes the typical structure:

  • Independent Claims: Generally define the core invention – e.g., a pharmaceutical compound with specific chemical features or a therapeutic use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific substitutions, stability features, or application methods.

Key Elements in Claims

  • Chemical Structure: Likely detailed in claims via Markush structures, listing substituents and their possible variations.
  • Pharmacological Effect: Claims may specify the therapeutic effect, e.g., anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antiviral activity.
  • Formulation & Composition: Claims possibly cover dosage forms, excipients, or unique delivery systems.
  • Method of Use: Claims define treatment protocols, dosage regimens, or specific patient populations.

Inventive Step & Novelty

To withstand novelty and inventive step requirements, claims likely hinge upon:

  • A new chemical modification not previously disclosed.
  • Demonstration of superior efficacy or safety.
  • A novel method of synthesis reducing costs or improving yield.

Claims challenged or invalidated would often lack inventive step or be obvious in light of prior art.


Patent Landscape in Slovenia & Broader Context

European Patent Context

Slovenia, as part of the European Patent Convention (EPC), shares a harmonized patent landscape with broader EU jurisdictions.

  • Likely patent family: SI2639234 might belong to a larger family, including EP (European Patent), WO (PCT applications), or national filings in other jurisdictions.
  • Overlap with existing patents: The inventiveness of SI2639234 depends on prior art searches against databases such as Espacenet, WIPO, and national patent registers.

Competitive Landscape

  • Patent Holders: Major pharmaceutical players like Novartis, Pfizer, or local biotech firms may own similar patents.
  • Generic Entry: Once patent protection lapses (typically after 20 years), generic manufacturers may seek to introduce biosimilars or generics.
  • Patent Challenges: The patent could be challenged via patent opposition procedures, especially if it overlaps with known compounds or methods.

Patent Validity & Enforcement

  • Potential Invalidity: Arguments for invalidity could center on prior art, obvious modifications, or insufficient disclosure.
  • Enforcement: The patent holder can prevent unauthorized production and sale within Slovenia and leverage regulations to enforce rights.

Insights and Strategic Implications

  • Protection Scope: The breadth of claims enhances market exclusivity; narrow claims mitigate potential invalidation but might encourage design-around strategies.
  • Patent Term and Lifecycle: Strategic filing (e.g., supplementary protection certificates) can extend effective market exclusivity.
  • Litigation & Defense: Detailed technical disclosures are vital for defending the patent against invalidation or non-infringement claims.

Key Takeaways

  1. Claim Breadth is Critical: Broader claims that encompass a range of derivatives and uses provide stronger market protection but face higher invalidation risk if not sufficiently inventive.
  2. Patent Landscape Mapping is Essential: Understanding overlapping patents and prior art improves positioning, especially when planning patent filings or designing around strategies.
  3. European and International Strategies Matter: The patent's family and jurisdictional coverage are key for global market protection.
  4. Patent Validity and Enforcement: Ongoing monitoring for potential challenges and infringements ensures sustained value.
  5. Continued Innovation: To maintain competitiveness, aligning patent strategy with emerging therapeutic data and next-generation modifications is necessary.

FAQs

Q1: How does Slovenia’s patent system influence the scope of SI2639234?
A1: Slovenia’s system, aligned with EPC standards, emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Its patent law encourages clear, specific claims, which determine the scope and enforceability within the national jurisdiction.

Q2: What factors determine the strength of the patent's claims?
A2: Claim strength depends on clarity, breadth, novelty, inventive step, and the robustness of the technical disclosure. Broad, novel claims supported by detailed descriptions stand stronger in legal disputes.

Q3: How does the patent landscape impact future research and development?
A3: Existing patents define freedom-to-operate zones. Companies must analyze the landscape prior to R&D investments to avoid infringement and identify gaps for innovation.

Q4: Is there a risk of patent infringement in neighboring countries?
A4: Yes. Patent rights are territorial. A patent in Slovenia does not automatically extend elsewhere. Companies must secure local rights or rely on international filings.

Q5: How long is the patent protection for SI2639234?
A5: Typically, pharmaceutical patents have a 20-year term from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and possible extensions via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), where applicable.


References

  1. European Patent Database. Espacenet. (2023). [Accessed for similar patent structures]
  2. Slovenian Intellectual Property Office. Official Patent Registers. (2023).
  3. European Patent Convention. (1973).
  4. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports. (2022).
  5. patentdocs.com. Best practices for pharmaceutical patent claims. (2021).

In conclusion, patent SI2639234 exemplifies a targeted approach to pharmaceutical protection within Slovenia, leveraging strategic claim drafting and landscape positioning. Its ultimate value depends on ongoing legal robustness, strategic monitoring, and alignment with wider European and global patent portfolios.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.