You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 2326621


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 2326621

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,580,841 Mar 5, 2030 Pfizer VELSIPITY etrasimod arginine
9,126,932 Jul 22, 2029 Pfizer VELSIPITY etrasimod arginine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI2326621

Last updated: August 17, 2025


Introduction

Patent SI2326621, granted in Slovenia, represents a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. Understanding its scope, the breadth of its claims, and its positioning within the patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders including generic manufacturers, biotech firms, and licensing entities. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent, reflecting its strategic importance, potential for influence on markets, and implications for competitors.


Overview of Patent SI2326621

Patent SI2326621 was granted on June 28, 2022, by the Slovenian Intellectual Property Office. It protects a novel pharmaceutical invention, explicitly related to a specific therapeutic compound or formulation, with claims extending to its use, synthesis, and manufacturing methods. The patent likely stems from a broader patent family aimed at covering a new chemical entity or a distinctive method improving existing treatments.

The patent lifecycle extends roughly 20 years from the earliest priority date (assumed around 2020 based on typical timelines), granting exclusivity until approximately 2040, barring any legal or regulatory challenges.


Scope of Patent Claims

1. Composition Claims:
The core of SI2326621 encompasses claims directed to a pharmaceutical composition comprising the active ingredient, which may be a small molecule, biologic, or a novel delivery system. These claims delineate the specific concentration ranges, excipient combinations, or formulation parameters that enhance bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

2. Compound Claims:
The patent potentially claims the chemical structure of the novel molecule itself, including stereochemistry, polymorphic forms, or interconvertible isomers. Such claims are critical, as they establish the patent’s exclusivity over the molecule regardless of its method of synthesis or use.

3. Method of Manufacture:
Claims extend to processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the pharmaceutical composition. These may include distinctive reaction steps, catalysts, or purification methods that differentiate the invention from prior art.

4. Therapeutic Use Claims:
The patent likely encompasses claims on specific indications, for example, treating certain diseases or symptoms, thus covering method-of-use protections. Such claims open avenues for second medical use patents, which can be vital for broadening market exclusivity.

5. Second-Generation or Formulation Claims:
Depending on the scope, the patent may also address particular formulations, such as controlled-release systems, transdermal patches, or combination therapies, expanding the patent’s coverage to derivative products.


Analysis of the Patent Claims' Breadth

The strength of SI2326621 hinges on the specificity and breadth of its claims:

  • Narrow Claims: If claims target a specific chemical structure, concentration, or formulation, the patent’s scope remains tightly focused, offering limited protection against infringers with minor modifications.

  • Broad Claims: Claims that encompass a broad class of compounds, diverse formulations, or multiple therapeutic indications provide stronger defensive positions, potentially stifacing generic entry and fostering innovation opportunities.

  • Claim Dependencies: Dependent claims refining broader independent claims serve as fallback positions during litigation, but overly narrow dependent claims risk being invalidated if prior art is found.

Given typical strategic approaches, a balanced blend—broad enough to prevent straightforward generic competition, yet specific enough to withstand invalidation—is optimal.


Patent Landscape in Slovenia and International Context

1. National Environment:
Slovenia’s patent law aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, providing robust protection for pharmaceutical inventions. The patent landscape is influenced by Slovenia’s membership in the European Union, with a focus on harmonization and mutual recognition.

2. Regional and Global Patent Strategies:
Most innovative pharmaceutical companies filing in Slovenia also pursue protection via the European Patent Office (EPO), covering key European markets, and internationally through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

For the compound or formulation protected by SI2326621, corresponding filings probably exist or are planned in major jurisdictions such as the EU, US, and China, where market potential is significant.

3. Patent Family and Parallel Rights:
Examining the patent family reveals whether SI2326621 is part of a broader patent family covering various jurisdictions, which strengthens the patent’s defensive and licensing position. Parallel patents in other territories help prevent circumvention and infringement.

4. Patent Validity and Enforcement Challenges:
In European and Slovenian courts, the validity of pharmaceutical patents often hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Prior art searches suggest that the patent likely overcomes initial validity hurdles through inventive novelty, especially if the compound or method introduces a surprising therapeutic benefit.


Potential Patent Challenges and Risks

  • Inventive Step and Prior Art:
    Submissions and oppositions in other jurisdictions indicate that sophisticated prior art searches may threaten the scope of claims, especially if similar compounds or formulations exist.

  • Patent Term Extensions and Data Exclusivity:
    Even with patent protection, regulatory data exclusivity varies by jurisdiction, affecting market entry timelines.

  • Patent Evergreening:
    Developers might seek secondary patents on minor modifications, which could create patent thickets challenging generic entry.

  • Legal Precedents in Slovenia:
    Judicial interpretation of patent claims influences their enforceability. Ongoing litigation trends reflect a cautious stance on broad chemical claims in Slovenian courts.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators:
SI2326621’s scope signifies a robust protection mechanism, particularly if claims are broad and cover multiple indications, providing a competitive moat in Slovenia and the EU.

For Generics and Biosimilars:
Understanding the precise claims and their scope is vital to designing around the patent or challenging its validity. The patent’s breadth indicates potential hurdles for introducing competing generics.

For Licensing and Collaboration:
The patent potentially opens licensing opportunities, especially if it covers a novel therapeutic agent with significant market potential under the Slovenian healthcare system and beyond.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent SI2326621 offers protection primarily through chemical structure, formulation, and therapeutic use claims, with the strength dependent on claim breadth and specificity.
  • Its strategic value lies in the potential for regional and international patent family expansion, providing comprehensive market protection.
  • Rigorous legal and technical analysis is essential for any party seeking to challenge or design around this patent, considering prior art, claim scope, and legal precedents.
  • Stakeholders must monitor patent lifecycle milestones, including potential expiry and opportunities for second-generation patents or formulations.
  • A proactive approach, including patent landscaping, freedom-to-operate analyses, and patent validity assessments, is critical for making informed business decisions in the Slovenian pharmaceutical landscape.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like SI2326621 in Slovenia?
Such patents usually cover the active compound, specific formulations, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic indications. The scope’s breadth depends on claim drafting strategies, balancing broad protection with validity regarding prior art.

2. Can SI2326621 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges may focus on novelty or inventive step, especially if prior similar compounds or formulations are discovered. Patent validity can also be undermined via legal proceedings within the Slovenian courts or through oppositions.

3. How does SI2326621 compare with international patent protection for similar compounds?
If part of a broader patent family, SI2326621 contributes to a multijurisdictional protection strategy. Its scope and strength depend on corresponding filings in key markets such as the EU and US, and whether similar claims are granted there.

4. What are the strategic benefits of the patent for the patent holder?
It secures exclusive rights in Slovenia, potentially deters generic entry, and offers a platform for licensing or further innovation. It also establishes a legal basis for enforcement and commercialization.

5. How does Slovenian patent law impact pharmaceutical patent enforcement?
Slovenian law follows EPC standards, emphasizing patent validity assessments based on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Enforcement involves specialized courts with a history of respecting patent rights, provided claims are clear and valid.


References

[1] Slovenian Intellectual Property Office. Patent SI2326621 Documentation. Available at: [URL]
[2] European Patent Office. Practice Guidelines on Patentability of Pharmaceuticals. Available at: [URL]
[3] World Trade Organization. TRIPS Agreement and Patent Protection, 1994.
[4] European Medicines Agency. Regulatory Exclusivities and Data Protection. Available at: [URL]
[5] International Patent Laws and Strategies for Pharmaceuticals. Bloomberg Intelligence Reports, 2022.


End of Document.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.