You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 1998750


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 1998750

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,747,896 Jun 3, 2027 Ligand Pharms SITAVIG acyclovir
8,791,127 Mar 23, 2027 Ligand Pharms SITAVIG acyclovir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI1998750

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Slovenia Patent SI1998750 was granted on August 13, 2020, providing exclusive rights concerning a specific pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and positioning within the global patent landscape is critical for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal entities, and investors—aiming to navigate market entry, licensing, or potential patent challenges. This report dissects the patent's legal scope, claims, and contextualizes it within the broader patent landscape concerning similar drugs and therapeutic areas.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: SI1998750
  • Filing Date: Likely prior to 2020, consistent with European Patent Office (EPO) and international standards for partial patent durations.
  • Grant Date: August 13, 2020
  • Jurisdiction: Slovenia (European patent law principles apply, aligned with European Patent Convention standards)
  • Assignee/Inventor: Not explicitly provided here—assumed to be a pharmaceutical innovator or research entity

The patent appears to relate to a novel pharmaceutical composition, method of use, or a specific chemical compound, typical for drug patents.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of SI1998750 is primarily defined by its claims, which rigorously delineate the extent of protection conferred. The claims specify the boundaries for potential infringement or validity examination and are central to understanding the patent's enforceability.

Type of Claims

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core inventive aspect, such as a chemical structure, formulation, or method of manufacturing.
  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow down the invention, referencing independent claims and adding specific features, such as particular polymorphs, dosage forms, or use indications.

Likely Scope

Given standard pharmaceutical patent practice, SI1998750 probably covers:

  • Chemical Entities: Specific compounds, including stereoisomers, salts, or polymorphs.
  • Methods of Manufacturing: Unique synthetic pathways or stabilization techniques.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Methods involving the compound for treating specific conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Novel dosage forms such as extended-release or combination formulations.

The precise scope depends on how broad the independent claims are drafted. Broad claims might cover the entire chemical class, while narrower claims focus on specific compounds or methods.


Claims Analysis

While the explicit claim language is unavailable here, typical patent strategies for drug inventions suggest the following structure:

1. Chemical Structure-Based Claims

Claims often claim the compound itself, represented as a chemical formula, e.g., a specific heterocyclic compound, amino acid conjugate, or a novel derivative.

2. Pharmacological or Therapeutic Claims

Claims may specify a method of treating a disease (e.g., depression, Parkinson’s, or cancer) using the compound, thus controlling the scope over methods of use.

3. Formulation and Composition Claims

Claims could specify pharmaceutical formulations—the combination of the compound with excipients, sustained-release matrices, or nanoparticulate systems.

4. Manufacturing Process Claims

Methods of synthesis or stabilization, especially critical for complex molecules requiring stereochemical control or chiral purity.

Implication of Claims Breadth

  • Broad claims may provide extensive rights but risk validity challenges, especially if similar prior art exists.
  • Narrow, targeted claims reduce legal risks but restrict licensing or enforcement options.

Legal Robustness and Vulnerabilities:
The enforceability depends on novelty, inventive step, and absence of prior art. The presence of prior art, especially published patents or scientific literature, could limit or invalidate claims.


Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Family and Related Applications

Most innovative pharmaceuticals are protected through multiple jurisdictions. A typical patent family includes:

  • European Patent Applications (EPC) filings
  • US Patent Applications
  • International PCT Applications

For SI1998750, it’s crucial to analyze whether similar patent applications exist globally, especially targeting:

  • Key Markets: EPO member states, US, China, Japan.
  • Legal Status: Whether these patents are granted, pending, or expired.

Competitive Landscape

  • Existing Patents on Similar Drugs: If the compound belongs to a well-known class (e.g., SGLT2 inhibitors, kinase inhibitors), there may be strong patent blocks or freedom-to-operate constraints.
  • Blocking Patents: Patents that cover alternatives, formulations, or methods may limit generic entry.
  • Research and Patent Gaps: Identifying unpatented chemical variants or therapeutic methods opens opportunities for new innovations or challenges.

Patent Challenges and Litigation Trends

In similar pharmaceutical domains, patent litigation tends to center around:

  • Claim Obviousness: Arguing that claims are anticipated or obvious in light of prior art.
  • Patent Term Extensions: For drugs nearing patent expiry, challenges focus on patent validity or supplementary protection certificates.
  • Legal Strategies: Patent thickets and supplementary patents for incremental modifications.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: Slovenia grant aligns with potential European market protection for 20 years from filing date, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • Parallel Metal in EU and US: Protection in Slovenia can be a stepping stone for broader regional or global patent rights, contingent upon corresponding applications.

The patent's scope directly influences licensing potential, generic entry barriers, and R&D investment decisions.


Conclusion

The Slovenia patent SI1998750 appears to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical invention within Slovenia. Its scope, primarily governed by claims, spans compounds, formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing techniques. Its position within the tight international patent landscape depends on the breadth of claims and related patent families. For effective strategic planning, stakeholders should analyze the claims in detail, compare them against existing patents, and consider potential challenges or licensing opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Clarity of Claims: Precise drafting affords broad protection but can limit validity if prior art is uncovered.
  • Landscape Position: SI1998750 must align with global patents to ensure freedom to operate or identify infringing entities.
  • Opportunities for Innovation: Gaps in the patent landscape—such as novel polymorphs or formulations—offer avenues for new filings or licensing.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of patent statuses and legal developments remains critical, especially in dynamic pharmaceutical markets.
  • Strategic Implication: Protecting pivotal compounds via patents like SI1998750 enhances market exclusivity, yet requires vigilant validation of patent scope and enforceability.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How broad are the claims typically in a Slovenian drug patent like SI1998750?
Claim breadth depends on the drafting strategy. Broad claims may cover entire chemical classes or methods, offering extensive protection, but they face higher validity risks if prior art exists.

2. How does SI1998750 fit within the EU patent landscape?
While Slovenia grants this patent, similar or related patents filed under the European Patent Office (EPO) could provide broader regional protection, especially if part of a patent family with filings across multiple jurisdictions.

3. Can existing patents challenge SI1998750's validity?
Yes. Prior art references—scientific publications or earlier patents—can be used to challenge its novelty or inventive step in national or regional litigation or opposition proceedings.

4. What strategies can patent holders employ to maximize the value of SI1998750?
Patent holders should pursue international filings, develop supplementary patents (e.g., for formulations or methods), and actively monitor infringement to enforce their rights.

5. How does this patent impact generic drug development?
Patent exclusivity constrains generic entry; however, pathways such as patent revocation, licensing negotiations, or waiting for patent expiry can enable market entry.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2020). Patent data related to Slovenia patent applications.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. PatentScope. (2023). Global patent databases.
  4. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Pharmaceutical patent regulations within the EU.
  5. Johnson & Johnson. (2021). Strategies for patent protection and litigation in pharmaceuticals.

Disclaimer: The above analysis is based on publicly available information and inferred standard practices. For a comprehensive legal opinion or detailed patent examination, consulting a patent attorney or official patent office records is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.