You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 1988779


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 1988779

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 20, 2030 Anacor Pharms Inc EUCRISA crisaborole
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2027 Anacor Pharms Inc EUCRISA crisaborole
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2027 Anacor Pharms Inc EUCRISA crisaborole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI1988779

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent SI1988779 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted in Slovenia, a key jurisdiction within the European patent system. While details such as the patent title, filing date, and applicant are typically the starting points for in-depth analysis, the core focus herein is on establishing the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding SI1988779. This analysis aims to inform stakeholders about the patent’s strategic positioning, enforceability, and potential competition within the pharmaceutical sector.


Patent Overview and Basic Data

Patent Number: SI1988779
Filing Date: [Exact date needed, assumed circa 2010-2015 based on typical grant timelines]
Grant Date: [Exact date needed]
Applicant: [Applicant Name, e.g., a prominent pharma company or academic institution]
Jurisdiction: Slovenia (European Patent Office parties may also be relevant)
Patent Classifications: Likely falls within chemical/pharmaceutical IPC codes such as A61K (medical preparations) or C07D (heterocyclic compounds).

Note: Exact filing and publication data, available via Slovenian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) or Espacenet, are needed for precise scholarly reference but are assumed here for a generic analysis.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Limitations

The core of patent SI1988779 resides in its claims, which define the scope of exclusivity. Typically, pharmaceutical patents comprise:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Use claims: Cover specific therapeutic applications.
  • Formulation claims: Encompass particular delivery systems or compositions.
  • Process claims: Cover synthesis or manufacturing methods.

In the case of SI1988779, the claims are anticipated to focus on a novel chemical compound or a combination thereof with indicated therapeutic benefits.

Claim specificity:

  • Likely includes broad independent claims covering a class of compounds with structural generalities.
  • Multiple dependent claims narrow these broad claims to specific substituents or stereochemistries.

The scope's strength depends on claim language precision and the breadth of the chemical or functional definitions used. Broad claims can provide wide protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges, whereas narrow claims offer enforceability at the expense of limiting coverage.

Novelty and Inventive Step

  • Novelty:
    The patent claims a specific chemical entity or therapeutic application not previously disclosed in prior art, such as earlier patents, scientific publications, or public disclosures.
  • Inventive Step:
    The invention demonstrates a non-obvious improvement or unique synthesis approach, considering existing knowledge. The patent possibly leverages a new modification of an existing drug, a novel therapeutic use, or a unique formulation.

Implications:
Claims that encompass new chemical derivatives with demonstrable improved efficacy or reduced side effects tend to be valued higher in patent landscape considerations.


Patent Landscape and Market Implications

Prior Art and Overlap Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves assessing prior art to identify potential overlaps or freedom-to-operate issues. For SI1988779:

  • Similar existing patents likely cover related molecular structures, therapeutic uses, and formulations, especially from major pharmaceutical players.
  • European and global patent families may contain overlapping claims, particularly if the invention belongs to a well-studied compound class such as kinase inhibitors, antibiotics, or biologics.

Patent databases such as Espacenet, Patentscope, and the EPO’s DOCDB are crucial for identifying relevant prior art and assessing patent thickets, which can complicate subsequent development or commercialization.

Legal Status and Expiry

  • The patent’s legal status in Slovenia should be checked for validity, maintenance fees paid, and any pendency of oppositions.
  • Patent lifespan typically extends 20 years from filing, subject to timely maintenance.
  • As of the current date, if SI1988779 was filed over 10 years ago, it might be nearing expiry, opening opportunities for generic or biosimilar development.

Geographical Coverage and Family Members

  • If the applicant filed European or international applications, SI1988779 might be part of a broader patent family.
  • Examination of family members in key markets (EU, US, China) is vital for strategic planning.

Competitive Landscape

  • Major patent families around SI1988779 may involve competitors pursuing similar chemical modifications, formulations, or indications.
  • The patent’s strength depends on its claim breadth relative to these overlapping applications.

Potential Challenges and Risks

  • Invalidation Risks: Broader claims are more susceptible to revocation if prior art disclosures are identified.
  • Infringement Risks: Active development of similar compounds or uses by competitors might infringe, prompting licensing negotiations.
  • Patent Term Extensions: In some jurisdictions, regulatory delays in drug approval can be compensated with patent term extensions, although Slovenia does not offer such extensions explicitly.

Regulatory Context and Strategic Considerations

  • Link with Regulatory Approval:
    Patent protection aligns with regulatory approval timelines; any delay can erode exclusivity.
  • Lifecycle Management:
    Supplementary patents (e.g., for formulations or methods of use) might extend protection and market exclusivity.
  • Patent Challenges:
    Post-grant opposition or patent invalidation procedures can threaten scope, emphasizing the importance of robust prosecution and strategic claim drafting.

Conclusion

The patent SI1988779 appears to secure exclusive rights over a specific chemical entity or therapeutic application within Slovenia, with claims tailored to balance broad protective scope and specific structural features. Its position within the overall patent landscape depends heavily on prior art, the breadth of claims, and subsequent patent family filings. Strategic considerations for stakeholders include evaluating potential infringement risks, expiry timelines, and opportunities for lifecycle extension.


Key Takeaways

  • Assessment of Claims: A focused review of claim language is essential to determine enforceability and scope. Narrow claims protect specific compounds, while broader claims can cover more therapeutic variants but risk validity challenges.
  • Patent Landscape Vigilance: Regular landscape mapping reveals overlapping patent rights, potential freedom-to-operate issues, and areas for innovation.
  • Strategic Timing: Aligning patent maintenance and lifecycle strategies with regulatory milestones maximizes market exclusivity.
  • Global Expansion: Filing in key jurisdictions should complement the Slovenian patent, especially where market penetration or generic challenges are anticipated.
  • Operational Vigilance: Monitoring patent statuses and challenges safeguards against infringement risks and supports timely enforcement.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of claims in Slovenian pharmaceutical patents such as SI1988779?
Claims usually encompass specific chemical compounds, their derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic uses, tailored to balance broad protection with defensibility against prior art challenges.

2. How can I determine if SI1988779 overlaps with existing patents?
A comprehensive prior art search utilizing patent databases like Espacenet and WIPO’s Patentscope is essential. Comparing claims, classifications, and filing dates helps identify overlaps or potential infringement.

3. When is SI1988779 likely to expire, and what does that mean for market competition?
Assuming typical 20-year patent terms from filing, and considering possible prosecution delays, expiry could occur between 2025–2030. Post-expiry, generics may enter the market, reducing exclusivity.

4. How does Slovenia's patent system impact pharmaceutical patent enforcement?
Slovenia's adherence to the European Patent Convention aligns its patent system with broader EU patent practices, including litigation, opposition, and validity procedures, providing a reliable enforcement framework.

5. Can SI1988779 be extended or modified to prolong market exclusivity?
While patent term extensions are limited in Slovenia, filing secondary patents—such as formulations, methods of use, or delivery innovations—can extend patent protection.


Sources:

[1] Slovenian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) Patent Database.
[2] Espacenet Patent Search.
[3] European Patent Office.
[4] WIPO PATENTSCOPE.
[5] European Patent Convention and EU patent laws.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.