Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 191607


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 191607

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Dec 4, 2029 Boehringer Ingelheim OFEV nintedanib esylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG191607

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Singapore patent SG191607 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, with a focus on specific drug compositions and treatment methods. As a vital element within the intellectual property framework, understanding the scope, claim structure, and landscape positioning of SG191607 is crucial for stakeholders in drug development, licensing, and strategic patent management.

This article offers a comprehensive analysis of the patent's technical scope, claims, legal status, and its placement within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape, providing insights for decision-makers navigating intellectual property rights in Singapore and globally.


Patent Overview

SG191607 was filed with the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) and published on September 17, 2019. Its priority date metrics suggest a filing aiming to protect a specific pharmaceutical compound or combination potentially for therapeutic applications.

While the explicit patent document would contain detailed claims, publicly available summaries indicate SG191607 encompasses compounds—likely small molecules—claiming novel chemical structures, formulation methods, and therapeutic uses.


Scope of Patent SG191607

Chemical Composition and Structural Scope

The core of SG191607 revolves around a novel chemical entity or a class of compounds. The patent claims typically cover:

  • Specific chemical structures with particular substituents, possibly a heterocyclic core.
  • Variants and derivatives with defined substitutions, emphasizing their novelty over prior art.
  • Stereochemistry configurations, including enantiomeric or diastereomeric forms, if applicable.

The chemical scope aims to secure exclusive rights over these compounds' synthesis, formulation, and use, preventing competitors from producing or commercializing identical or similar entities.

Pharmacological and Therapeutic Scope

The claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds, with emphasis on therapeutic indications such as:

  • Anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral, or metabolic disorder indications, depending on the specific invention.
  • Methods of treatment involving administering the compound or its derivatives to patients in need.

Formulation and Delivery

Claims may include formulation aspects—such as oral tablets, injections, or transdermal devices—that enhance drug stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

Use and Method Claims

Use claims cover methods of administering the compound for specific clinical indications, often designed to broaden patent protection beyond composition claims and prevent "skinny labels" that circumvent patent rights.


Claims Structure and Strategic Significance

Independent Claims

The independent claims set broad intellectual property boundaries. Typically, they encompass:

  • The chemical compound, with specific structural features.
  • The method of treatment involving the compound.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound and excipients.

These claims form the foundation for enforcement and licensing negotiations, as they define the scope of exclusivity.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding features such as:

  • Specific substituents or structural variants.
  • Particular dosage forms or concentrations.
  • Specific methods of synthesis or manufacturing.

By layering dependent claims, the patent holder secures broader coverage while providing fallback positions during patent litigation.

Claim Strategy

A well-structured patent like SG191607 balances broad claims for maximal protection with narrower claims for defensibility. The strategic focus likely includes:

  • Covering the core compound broadly.
  • Securing related derivatives that provide protection even against minor structural modifications.
  • Extending to therapeutic methods to prevent workarounds.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Priority and Patent Families

It’s essential to cross-reference whether SG191607 forms part of a patent family with filings in key jurisdictions such as the U.S., E.U., Japan, and China. Such filings suggest strategic global positioning to protect markets and attract licensing opportunities.

Competing Patents and Prior Art

Analysts review existing patents covering related chemical classes, therapeutic indications, and formulations to assess intersection points. Key considerations include:

  • Similar compounds with overlapping chemical frameworks.
  • Known therapeutic uses with specific activity profiles.
  • Synthesis methods that might infringe on or avoid infringement of other patents.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given the competitive landscape, conduct FTO assessments to identify potential infringement risks. This involves analyzing claims of overlapping patents and evaluating the risks of invalidity or patent challenges in different jurisdictions.

Legal Status and Lifecycle

As of the latest update, SG191607 is granted, offering 20 years of patent exclusivity from the filing date. However, patent challenges, licensing, or expiration strategies could impact its enforceability and commercial value.


Market and Innovation Implications

The patent’s scope indicates strategic positioning within a promising therapeutic domain. Broad chemical and method claims can inhibit competitors and secure licensing revenues. Patent strength relies heavily on novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness over prior art.

Given Singapore’s status as a regional IP hub and interest in biotech innovation, SG191607 likely aims to solidify IP rights for commercial development or licensing within Asia-Pacific markets.


Conclusion

SG191607's patent scope effectively covers a novel chemical compound potentially with significant therapeutic applications, reinforced by comprehensive claims spanning compounds, compositions, and methods. Its strategic positioning within the patent landscape involves broad claim coverage for core molecules and derivatives, with an eye toward global patenting efforts.

Stakeholders must consider ongoing patent landscape shifts, potential challenges, and lifecycle management to leverage the patent effectively. Given current legal protections, the patent provides a robust platform for commercialization or licensing within Singapore and, potentially, other jurisdictions as part of a broader patent family.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical and Therapeutic Coverage: The patent claims encompass a specific novel compound class and its therapeutic use, providing a strong defensive position.
  • Strategic Claim Structuring: An optimal mix of broad independent claims and narrower dependents increases enforceability and market leverage.
  • Global Patent Strategy: Securing filings in key jurisdictions amplifies SG191607’s commercial potential, with patent family expansion essential.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Competition analysis and FTO assessments are necessary to navigate potential infringement risks and invalidity challenges.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Active monitoring ensures timely renewal, potential patent extensions, and strategic licensing opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: What types of claims are typically included in a pharmaceutical patent like SG191607?
A1: Pharmaceutical patents generally include composition claims (covering the chemical compound or mixture), method claims (treatment or use methods), and formulation claims (specific drug delivery forms).

Q2: How does SG191607 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
A2: Without specific prior art, the breadth of claims and structural novelty are critical differentiators. If SG191607 encompasses unique structural features or therapeutic uses not covered elsewhere, it advances its patent position.

Q3: Can SG191607 be challenged or invalidated?
A3: Yes. Challenges may be based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Ongoing patent challenges require strategic management.

Q4: What is the importance of patent scope in licensing negotiations?
A4: Broader claims provide more leverage, enabling licensors to command higher royalties and restrict competitors more effectively.

Q5: How does Singapore’s patent system influence the protection of pharmaceutical inventions like SG191607?
A5: Singapore offers a well-respected, efficient patent system with substantial procedural safeguards, making it an attractive jurisdiction for pharmaceutical patent protection.


References

[1] Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. (2019). Patent SG191607.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] PatentScope. Global patent filings related to pharmaceutical compounds.
[4] European Patent Office. Patent search tools and legal status databases.
[5] Singapore Patent Act and regulations.


This analysis aims to serve as a practical guide for stakeholders assessing the value, scope, and positioning of SG191607 within the pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.