You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 184201


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 184201

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,890,270 Aug 8, 2032 Siga Technologies TPOXX tecovirimat
12,433,868 Mar 23, 2031 Siga Technologies TPOXX tecovirimat
9,339,466 Mar 23, 2031 Siga Technologies TPOXX tecovirimat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG184201

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Patent SG184201 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Singapore. As a jurisdiction with a sophisticated intellectual property framework, Singapore's patent landscape presents unique challenges and opportunities for pharmaceutical innovators. This analysis elucidates the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape surrounding SG184201, with insights into its strategic significance within the global drug patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Background

SG184201 was granted based on an application that likely claims novel aspects of a drug or its formulation. While specific details must be based on the official patent document, most pharmaceutical patents encompass compositions, synthesis processes, dosage forms, or methods of use.

In Singapore’s patent system, the scope primarily hinges on the precise wording of claims, which define the legal protection boundaries. The patent’s family status, citing history, and examiner’s comments further contextualize its enforceability and strategic importance.


Scope of Patent SG184201

Legal Scope of Claims

The core claims of SG184201 are presumed to cover:

  • Compound Claims: If the patent claims a chemical entity, its scope includes structurally similar derivatives and salts, provided they fall within the scope of the described structural features.

  • Method of Use: Claims may specify particular indications or treatment methods, extending patent protection to specific therapeutic methods.

  • Formulation Claims: If the patent covers specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release), the scope may extend to similar compositions incorporating similar excipients or therapeutic ratios.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims could include synthesis or purification processes for the active compound, safeguarding specific manufacturing steps.

The breadth of the claims profoundly influences enforcement; broader claims provide wider coverage but risk invalidation if deemed overly broad or obvious.

Claim Types and Strategies

  • Product-by-Process Claims: Protects a specific drug compound derived via detailed synthesis.

  • Use Claims: Covering novel therapeutic indications or dosing regimens.

  • Formulation Claims: Protecting innovative delivery systems or excipient combinations.

  • Process Claims: Securing novel methods of manufacturing.

Claim Interpretation in Singapore

Singapore employs a "purposive approach" to claim interpretation, emphasizing the intent of claims and the entire patent disclosure. This promotes a balanced scope—neither overly broad nor unduly narrow—protecting genuine innovations while maintaining clarity.


Patent Landscape in Singapore and Globally

Regional Patent Strategies

Singapore serves as a strategic regional filing hub within Asia, particularly under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). It offers an efficient route to patent protection across ASEAN and beyond, facilitating enforcement and licensing.

Comparative Analysis

  • Where is SG184201’s protection most relevant?
    The patent likely targets markets with high growth prospects for the drug’s therapeutic class, including China, India, and Western countries, via national filings and PCT routes.

  • Relation to International Patent Families
    SG184201 might be part of a larger patent family covering global territories, ensuring broad exclusivity.

  • Patent Landscape for Similar Compounds
    Competitive landscape involves companies holding patents on similar chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic uses, demanding careful claim drafting to avoid infringement and ensure freedom to operate.

Legal and Regulatory Environment Impact

Singapore's IP enforcement, combined with its proactive patent examination, ensures that granted patents like SG184201 withstand scrutiny while providing robust protection against infringing generics.

Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Patent invalidation risks from prior art challenges, especially in the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors. Overly broad claims may be susceptible to revocation.

  • Opportunities: Strategic patent claiming can secure a competitive edge, especially when coupled with data exclusivity and regulatory exclusivities.


Strategic Considerations for the Patent Holder

Defining the Scope

  • Focus claims narrowly enough to avoid prior art, yet broadly enough to deter competitors.
  • Include method of use and formulation claims for comprehensive protection.

Patent Maintenance

  • Regularly monitor potential infringing products.
  • Enforce rights proactively within Singapore and internationally.

Portfolio Development

  • File follow-up patents to cover improved formulations, new indications, or alternative synthesis routes.

Conclusion

The scope and claims of SG184201, like most pharma patents, revolve around a core chemical or therapeutic innovation coupled with auxiliary claims to maximize protection. Its position within the Singapore patent landscape reflects a strategic tool for safeguarding pharmaceutical assets and enabling global market access.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim language is vital for ensuring enforceability and preventing invalidation.
  • Broad yet defensible claims balance market protection with robustness against prior art.
  • Singapore’s patent system offers an advantageous platform for regional and global patent protection.
  • Comprehensive patent strategy, including formulation, process, and use claims, enhances market exclusivity.
  • Regular portfolio review and vigilant enforcement underpin long-term value extraction from the patent.

FAQs

1. What kinds of claims are most common in pharmaceutical patents like SG184201?
Compound claims, method-of-use claims, formulation claims, and manufacturing process claims predominate, offering layered protection for different aspects of the drug.

2. How does Singapore’s patent system affect pharmaceutical patent strategy?
Singapore’s efficient examination process and regional filing access make it an ideal hub for protecting drug innovations in Asia, supporting strategic global patent portfolios.

3. Can SG184201 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Careful patent drafting and monitoring can mitigate these risks.

4. How do patent claims influence a company's ability to commercialize a drug?
Strong, well-defined claims can prevent entry of generics, ensuring market exclusivity and profitability.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape critical for drug development?
It helps identify potential patent hurdles, opportunities for freedom-to-operate, and areas for innovation, informing licensing and strategic planning.


References

  1. Singapore Intellectual Property Office (IPOS). Patent Rules and Guidelines.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PCT Resource Center.
  3. Taylor Wessing. Pharmaceutical Patents: Strategies and Practice.
  4. FICPI. Patent Landscapes and Competition Analysis.
  5. Dlamini, S. et al. "Patent Strategy for Pharmacological Innovations." Journal of IP Law, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.