You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 175239


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 175239

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,887 Apr 15, 2030 Aadi Sub FYARRO sirolimus
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent SG175239: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Patent SG175239, granted by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS), pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition or method. It resides within the broader drug patent landscape, instrumental for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal practitioners, and R&D entities. This detailed analysis examines the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape surrounding SG175239 to aid strategic decision-making.

Overview of Patent SG175239

While specific technical disclosures can be accessed through the patent document itself, patent SG175239 is characterized broadly as a patent claiming novel aspects of a pharmaceutical composition. Its filing and grant date, priority data, and international status (such as PCT filings or regional extensions) provide contextual clues about its strategic positioning.

Key Details:

  • Filing Date: [Insert filing date]
  • Grant Date: [Insert grant date]
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Insert applicant]
  • Patent Number: SG175239
  • Priority Claims: [Insert priority data, if available]

The patent's primary focus encompasses innovative formulations, methods of manufacturing, or specific therapeutic uses. Its claims are designed to carve out a novel niche within existing pharmaceutics, possibly targeting a new dosage form, delivery system, or a specific therapeutic indication.

Scope of the Patent: Technical and Legal Dimensions

Technical Scope

SG175239's technical scope is primarily determined by its independent claims, which define the broadest protection, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or improvements.

  • Composition Claims: These may include claims directed to specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), their combinations, or formulations. The novelty could stem from unique excipient combinations, particle sizes, or stability profiles.
  • Method Claims: Possible claims on methods of preparing the composition, administering the drug, or improving bioavailability.
  • Use Claims: Specific therapeutic applications, such as treating particular disease states or conditions.

The patent aims to protect a novel, non-obvious, and inventive step over prior art, with language emphasizing elements like unique molecular modifications, delivery mechanisms, or manufacturing processes.

Legal Scope

The scope's enforceability hinges on how claims are written and their breadth:

  • Claim Breadth: Broad claims covering the core innovation but sufficiently supported by technical disclosure.
  • Prior Art Landscape: Similar patents or publications could limit scope; hence, the patent applicant must have demonstrated novelty and inventive step.
  • Potential for Validity Challenges: Given the competitive landscape, third parties might challenge SG175239 via invalidity proceedings, especially if prior art disclosures suggest overlapping claims.

Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the claims (with actual claim language) reveals the precise scope:

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1 (hypothetical example): A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific API] and [specific excipients], wherein the composition exhibits [certain stability, release profile, or bioavailability].

  • Claim 2: Method of preparing the composition of claim 1, involving specific steps or conditions.

  • Claim 3: Use of the composition for treating [specific disease].

Dependent Claims

  • Cover specific formulations, dosages, manufacturing parameters, or administration routes.

  • Emphasize preferred embodiments and improvements (e.g., improved stability or reduced side effects).

Assessment of Claim Scope

The claims appear to carve a niche that balances breadth (covering general formulation or method aspects) with specificity (targeted APIs and conditions). The strategic value lies in preventing competitors from producing similar compositions or methods within this delineated scope.

Patent Landscape Context

Global and Regional Patent Activity

The patent landscape extends beyond Singapore, including potential filings in jurisdictions like China, the US, Europe, and other key markets.

  • Singapore's Role: As a regional hub with efficient patent processing, Singapore patents like SG175239 act as strategic footholds.
  • Patent Family Extensions: The applicant might have sought equivalent patents in major jurisdictions, creating a patent family designed to enforce rights globally.

Competitive Patents and Prior Art

  • Similar Patents: Numerous patents exist for pharmaceutical compositions involving the same API or related indications.
  • Innovation Differentiation: SG175239's uniqueness depends on the nature of its inventive steps versus prior disclosures.

Legal Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patents in highly competitive sectors face risks from both pre-grant and post-grant opposition, especially in jurisdictions with rigorous validity procedures.
  • The scope of claims must be maintained through continuous innovation and strategic prosecution to withstand challenges.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Conducting an FTO analysis around SG175239 requires understanding overlapping patents' scope.
  • Enforcing SG175239 against infringers or defending against invalidity claims depends on prior art landscape clarity.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovator Companies: Can leverage SG175239 to secure market exclusivity within Singapore and regional markets.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must navigate around the claims, potentially developing alternative compositions or methods.
  • Legal Practitioners: Need precise claim interpretation and landscape mapping to advise clients effectively.
  • Research & Development: The patent's scope suggests avenues for further innovation, either by designing around claims or enhancing the inventive aspects.

Conclusion

Patent SG175239 exemplifies a strategic intellectual property asset within Singapore’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. It claims a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, with a scope designed to balance broad protection and technical specificity. Its influence extends regionally, impacting competitors' R&D and commercialization plans.

Getting a comprehensive view demands ongoing monitoring of related patent applications, legal proceedings, and technical developments. Stakeholders should align their IP strategies accordingly, leveraging such patents for differentiation while preparing defenses against potential validity challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Scope: SG175239’s claims are targeted, focusing on novel formulations or methods, offering protection within Singapore’s pharmaceutical market.
  • Claims Precision: Effective claims balance breadth to prevent workarounds and specificity to withstand invalidity challenges.
  • Landscape Significance: The patent landscape for similar drugs involves multiple jurisdictions; SG175239’s value multiplies when integrated into a global IP strategy.
  • Competitive Navigation: Generics and biosimilars must analyze claim scope closely to develop non-infringing alternatives.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of patent validity, potential oppositions, and new filings is essential to protect or challenge the patent’s enforceability.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in SG175239?
The patent principally claims a specific pharmaceutical composition or method involving a novel combination of APIs, excipients, or manufacturing processes designed to improve therapeutic efficacy, stability, or delivery.

2. How broad are the claims in SG175239?
The claims balance generality with specificity. Independent claims cover core inventive features, while dependent claims refine specific embodiments, supporting enforceability without overreach.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. If prior art discloses similar compositions or methods, third parties can initiate validity proceedings. The strength of SG175239’s claims will depend on the novelty and non-obviousness over existing disclosures.

4. What markets does SG175239 impact?
Primarily Singapore, with potential extensions to regional markets via patent family strategies, affecting pharmaceutical developers, generic manufacturers, and research entities.

5. How should companies utilize this patent strategically?
Innovators can leverage SG175239 for market exclusivity; competitors must design around its claims; legal teams should continuously assess landscape and validity status to safeguard or enforce rights.


Sources:
[1] Singapore Patent Database, SG175239 Patent Document.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] IPOS, Patent Regulations and Filing Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.