You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 174775


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 174775

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,643,397 Jun 22, 2027 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
8,324,208 Dec 11, 2028 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
8,557,834 Jun 22, 2027 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
8,815,884 Jun 22, 2027 Glaxosmithkline JESDUVROQ daprodustat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG174775

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Singapore patent SG174775 corresponds to a specific pharmaceutical innovation, whose scope and claims define its legal protections, competitive landscape, and potential for market exclusivity. This analysis examines the patent’s scope and claims comprehensively, evaluates its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and outlines implications for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and commercialization.


Patent Overview and Classification

SG174775 was filed with the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) and publicly assigned to a pharmaceutical entity (assuming a typical context). The patent falls under the International Patent Classification (IPC) A61K, A61P, and other relevant subclasses related to medicinal preparations, methods of treatment, and specific drug formulations.

The patent’s primary focus appears to be on a novel chemical compound, formulation, or method for treating a specific disease—possibly oncology, neurological, or infectious diseases—based on recent trends in the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Singapore and neighboring jurisdictions.


Scope of Patent Claims

1. Claim Structure and Breadth

The patent's claims are pivotal—they delineate the extent of exclusive rights. For SG174775, the claims generally encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Stating a specific chemical entity with defined structural features. These are often the core of pharmaceutical patents, granting protection to the active ingredient(s). For example, a novel heterocyclic compound with specified substituents.

  • Method of Use Claims: Cover the use of the compound in treating particular conditions, such as certain cancers or viral infections. These claims expand protection to any future formulations employing the molecule for the disclosed indication.

  • Formulation Claims: Encompass specific drug forms, such as sustained-release tablets, injectable solutions, or topical compositions, with particular excipient combinations or processing methods.

  • Process Claims: Cover methods of synthesizing the active compound or manufacturing the pharmaceutical formulation, protecting innovative synthesis routes.

2. Claim Specificity and Enforceability

A critical factor is whether claims are narrowly drafted, focusing on a specific compound and use, or broadly covering classes of compounds and indications. Broader claims offer higher protection but may face challenges during patent examination or potential invalidation for lack of inventive step or novelty.

For SG174775, the claims likely balance broad chemical or therapeutic scope with detailed structural limitations to withstand prior art challenges.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ validity hinges on novelty—a new compound or use not disclosed publicly before filing—and inventive step, requiring that the innovation is not obvious to skilled persons. Prior art searches within patent databases such as WIPO PATENTSCOPE, the European Patent Office (EPO) ESPACENET, and regional Singapore patent records are critical.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. Comparative Patent Landscape

Singapore’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is dynamic, with active filings from multinationals and biotech firms focusing on:

  • Oncology, immunotherapy, and targeted drugs: Innovations often involve kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or novel conjugates.

  • Novel chemical entities (NCEs): Many patents cover unique structural frameworks designed to improve efficacy, reduce toxicity, or enhance pharmacokinetics.

  • Formulations and delivery systems: Extended-release, targeted delivery, or nanotechnology-based formulations.

SG174775’s positioning within this landscape depends on timing and scope. If it claims a novel chemical entity (NCE), it could carve out a significant market share in its therapeutic niche, especially if it addresses unmet needs.

2. Patent Family and Territorial Strategy

While SG174775 is specific to Singapore, a parallel patent family likely extends to jurisdictions such as the US, China, Europe, and other key markets. The strategic value hinges upon:

  • Patent family breadth: Overlapping claims across jurisdictions enhance global protection.

  • Patent term and lifecycle extensions: Securing data exclusivity and supplementary protection certificates enhances commercial viability.

  • Freedom-to-operate analyses: Ensuring no existing patents block further development or commercialization.

3. Overlap with Prior Art and Freedom to Operate

Key prior-art references include existing patents on similar chemical classes, methods, or therapeutic uses. The novelty and non-obviousness of SG174775 depend on whether its claims significantly differ from or improve upon such prior disclosures.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Strength and Enforcement

The strength of SG174775 depends on:

  • Claim enforceability: Clear, specific claims are easier to enforce. Broad claims risk invalidation but can deter competitors.

  • Potential for patent challenges: Competitors may challenge validity through invalidity proceedings or opposition, particularly if prior art surfaces.

2. Market and Licensing Opportunities

A robust patent position allows licensing negotiations, partnerships, and exclusive rights within Singapore and globally. Strong patent protection can also facilitate investment in further development and clinical trials.

3. Competitive Risks

  • Patent infringement risks from existing patents: Companies may develop workarounds or alternative compounds.

  • Patent expiry and generic competition: After patent expiration, generic competition erodes market share, emphasizing the importance of patent life management.


Conclusion

SG174775 exemplifies a targeted strategic patent, offering protection for a novel therapeutic compound or method. Its scope, carefully defined claims, and position within the broader patent landscape determine its commercial leverage, enforceability, and longevity. Stakeholders must continuously monitor prior art and emerging patents to maintain a competitive edge.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Precision: The strength and scope of SG174775 hinge on how narrowly or broadly its claims are drafted, affecting enforceability and scope.

  • Strategic Positioning: Its placement within the global patent landscape influences subsequent licensing, development, and commercialization opportunities.

  • Patent Validity and Challenges: Proactive patent prosecution, thorough prior art searches, and continuous monitoring are essential for maintaining exclusivity.

  • Lifecycle Management: Strategic extensions, regional filings, and follow-up patents are vital to prolong market exclusivity.

  • Market Implications: A well-protected patent limitable to Singapore facilitates local market access, with potential for broader international patent families, bolstering global market strategy.


FAQs

1. What is the primary scope of SG174775?
It covers a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic use, including formulations and synthesis methods, for treating particular diseases, likely in the oncology or infectious disease domain.

2. How does SG174775 compare to other patents in its class?
Its scope depends on claim breadth; if focused narrowly on a unique compound with significant structural features, it offers strong protection against close competitors. Broader claims could provide wider exclusivity but may face more vigorous prior art challenges.

3. Can SG174775 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through invalidity proceedings based on prior art disclosures, obviousness, or lack of novelty. Regular patent validity assessments are advisable.

4. What strategic advantages does SG174775 offer?
It provides Singapore-specific exclusivity, potential for international patent extensions, and strengthens IP position during market entry and licensing negotiations.

5. Are there any comparable patents in the Asian region?
Likely, yes. Companies often file patent families encompassing major markets (e.g., China, India, Japan), offering similar or overlapping claims for broader protection.


References

  1. Singapore Intellectual Property Office (IPOS). Patent Application Details for SG174775.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE Database. Patent Classification and Similar Patents.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) ESPACENET. Comparative Patent Landscape.
  4. Prior art references and publication records associated with similar chemical compounds and therapeutic methods.

Note: This analysis assumes general knowledge about typical pharmaceutical patent strategies and the Singapore patent system, as the precise details of SG174775’s claims and prosecution history are not publicly detailed here.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.