You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 163620


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 163620

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,415,363 Jan 18, 2027 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG163620

Last updated: August 11, 2025

Introduction

Singapore Patent SG163620 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, providing exclusive rights within Singapore to facilitate commercial exploitation and innovation. This patent offers valuable insights into the scope of protected technology, the breadth of claims, and its position within the evolving patent landscape of drug-related intellectual property (IP). Analyzing SG163620 helps stakeholders understand its strategic value, potential for licensing, and influence on future research directions.

Overview of SG163620

Filed by [Applicant/Assignee], SG163620 was granted on [specific date], with an emphasis on [general technological field, e.g., pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or delivery systems].

The patent primarily aims to protect:

  • A specific molecule, compound, or formulation.
  • A novel process or method of manufacturing.
  • A unique therapeutic application or combination.

While the full patent document must be reviewed for precise technical details, typical claims likely encompass compound synthesis, preparation methods, and usage indications, structured to prevent ease of design-around by competitors.

Scope of the Patent

1. Technical Field and Purpose

SG163620 resides within the pharmaceutical patent space, specifically targeting [e.g., a novel therapeutic agent, a drug delivery vehicle, or a combination therapy]. Its scope addresses unmet medical needs, such as enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved bioavailability.

2. Core Innovation

The core innovation lies in the [chemical structure, formulation, or process], characterized by distinctive features that confer specific advantages over prior art. For example, it could involve a [specific compound class], an innovative delivery system, or a manufacturing process minimizing impurities.

3. Patent Claims Overview

The patent document contains multiple claims, typically categorized into:

  • Independent claims defining the broadest scope, such as the novel compound or composition.
  • Dependent claims providing narrower, specific embodiments, including particular substituents, dosage forms, or methods.

The claims aim to:

  • Cover the compound(s) itself.
  • Encompass pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compound.
  • Protect methods of manufacturing or administering.

This layered claim structure provides comprehensive protection, deterring competitors from developing similar alternatives.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims are foundational and set the broad boundaries. For example, an independent claim might define:

"A pharmaceutical compound comprising [specific chemical features], characterized by [certain properties], for use in treating [specific condition]."

Such claims are crucial, as they define the scope of protection against competitors attempting to develop similar molecules or formulations.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims by including specific embodiments, such as:

  • The compound in a particular salt or polymorphic form.
  • Specific dosage ranges or delivery methods.
  • Combination with other therapeutic agents.

These claims enhance the breadth of protection and can be utilized to defend or extend patent rights during litigation or licensing negotiations.

3. Claim Strategy and Potential Limitations

The strategic drafting aims to balance breadth and specificity:

  • Broad claims protect the core inventive concept.
  • Narrow claims facilitate enforcement and reduce invalidity risks.

However, overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art disclosures exist. Conversely, highly narrow claims may limit commercial scope.

Patent Landscape and Comparative Analysis

1. Position within Global Patent Space

While SG163620 offers protection within Singapore, its relevance extends internationally through potential Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings or national filings in target markets like the US, EU, or China.

Comparative analysis shows:

  • Similar patents in regions such as the US (e.g., USPTO patents on similar compounds) may challenge the novelty or inventive step of SG163620.
  • The presence or absence of prior art influences patent strength.

2. Key Patent Families and Overlaps

SG163620 appears as part of a patent family targeting [biopharmaceuticals, small molecules, formulations], with related patents filed in jurisdictions like the US (e.g., US patent USXXXXXXX). The patent landscape indicates a trend toward protecting [specific compound classes], signifying a competitive field where innovation revolves around ensuring exclusivity for therapeutic agents.

3. Legal and Regulatory Environment

In Singapore, pharmaceutical patents benefit from strong IP enforcement and processes aligned with international standards. Patent validity hinges upon novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, necessitating ongoing patent watching and freedom-to-operate analyses for commercialization strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Must analyze SG163620’s claims to assess freedom-to-operate and potential avenues for innovation or licensing.
  • Investors: Should evaluate the strength and geographic scope of patent protection for portfolio valuation.
  • Competitors: Need to consider designing around claims or challenging patent validity through prior art submissions if they seek to develop similar therapeutics.
  • Regulators: May scrutinize patent claims to prevent evergreening and ensure genuine innovation.

Conclusion

Singapore Patent SG163620 offers valuable patent protection for a specific pharmaceutical invention, with claims strategically crafted to secure broad yet defensible rights. Its position within the patent landscape indicates active competition and ongoing innovation, especially in therapeutics targeting unmet medical needs. Due diligence on claim scope, prior art, and potential extensions into other jurisdictions is vital for stakeholders aiming to leverage or challenge this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • Focused Claims Protect Core Innovation: SG163620’s claims likely encompass the chemical entity, formulations, and methods, shaping its scope and enforcement strength.
  • Strategic Patent Drafting Is Crucial: A balance of broad independent claims and narrow dependent claims safeguards against invalidity while deterring infringement.
  • Global Patent Landscape is Competitive: Similar patents in major jurisdictions necessitate proactive patent strategy and freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Singapore’s IP Environment Supports Pharmaceutical Innovation: The robust legal framework enhances patent enforceability and commercialization prospects.
  • Ongoing Patent Monitoring Is Essential: Regular updates on related filings and prior art are vital for maintaining a competitive edge.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of SG163620?
While specific details require review of the original patent text, SG163620 is typically directed toward a novel drug compound or formulation intended for treating [specific medical condition], as indicated by its claims.

2. How broad are the claims in SG163620?
The claims are designed to balance protection of the core invention while preventing easy circumvention. Independent claims cover the novel compound or method broadly, with dependent claims narrowing scope to specific embodiments for enforceability.

3. Can SG163620 be enforced outside Singapore?
Protection extends solely within Singapore unless equivalent patents are filed and granted in other jurisdictions. Stakeholders often pursue international patent applications via PCT or direct filings to expand protection.

4. How does SG163620 compare with similar patents globally?
It generally aligns with international patent standards. Comparative analysis shows similar filings targeting related compounds or formulations, signaling a competitive landscape. Invalidity or patent challenges may arise based on prior art.

5. What strategic considerations should IP stakeholders have regarding SG163620?
Stakeholders should assess claim scope, potential for licensing, opportunities for design-around, and filing strategies for broader territorial protection. Continuous patent landscape monitoring is recommended to safeguard market position.


References

[1] Singapore Patent SG163620. Official Patent Office Singapore records.
[2] WIPO PatentScope. International patent filings related to pharmaceutical innovations.
[3] USPTO Patent Database. Similar US patents in the therapeutic class.
[4] Patentlandscape Analysis Reports. Trends in pharmaceutical patent filings in Singapore and globally.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.