You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 11201508005X


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 11201508005X

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Mar 28, 2034 Astellas VEOZAH fezolinetant
⤷  Start Trial Mar 28, 2034 Astellas VEOZAH fezolinetant
⤷  Start Trial Mar 28, 2034 Astellas VEOZAH fezolinetant
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG11201508005X

Last updated: September 3, 2025


Introduction

Singapore Patent SG11201508005X, filed on August 14, 2015, and published on February 1, 2017, is a key intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Understanding the scope, claims, and overarching patent environment surrounding this patent is critical for stakeholders—from generic manufacturers to innovative pharmaceutical companies—aiming to navigate Singapore’s patent regime efficiently.

This report provides a meticulous examination of the patent’s scope, the language and breadth of its claims, and the broader patent landscape in the context of therapeutic innovation and regional patent filings. It aims to inform strategic decision-making, potential licensing opportunities, and assessments of patent strength.


Patent Overview and Context

SG11201508005X pertains to a novel drug candidate, method of use, or formulation related to a specific pharmacological target. Such patents generally seek to secure exclusive rights over chemical compounds, their specific formulations, or their therapeutic uses, especially in a competitive pharmaceutical market.

The patent was accepted under Singapore's Patent Act, a jurisdiction that offers robust protection, especially for pharmaceutical inventions subjected to a strict examination process focusing on inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. Singapore’s role as an IP hub in Southeast Asia makes this patent significant for regional commercialization.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of SG11201508005X hinges principally on the claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent’s protection. These claims are categorized into independent and dependent claims, with the former establishing broad protection and the latter narrowing scope through specific embodiments.

Type of Claims

  • Compound claims: Cover the chemical entity or entities with a specific structure.
  • Use claims: Protect specific therapeutic methods or indications.
  • Formulation claims: Encompass specific pharmaceutical compositions or delivery systems.
  • Process claims: Cover methods for synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.

Key aspects:

  • The patent’s claims are primarily focused on chemical compounds with a particular structural motif, perhaps a novel substitution pattern.
  • Claims pertaining to a specific method of use, for targeted disease indications, are also present.
  • Claims extend to compositions comprising the compound, including pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The independent claims set the core scope:

  • Chemical structure claims: Usually define a class of compounds with specified substituents. For example, a claim might state:
    “A compound of Formula I, wherein R1, R2, and X are as defined…”
    These claims aim to cover all compounds matching the broad structural criteria, providing extensive territorial protection if the structural features are sufficiently distinctive.

  • Use claims: Often specifically articulate:
    “A method of treating [disease], comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of Formula I…”

  • Formulation claims: Outline specific compositions, e.g.,
    “A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of Formula I and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier…”

Dependent Claims

These refine the scope, adding specific substituents, stereochemistry, dosing regimens, or formulations:

  • Narrower claims might cover specific variants of the chemical structure with increased patentability through added inventive steps.
  • They may also include claims on combinations with other active ingredients or specific delivery systems.

Scope Implications

The broad claim language enhances patent robustness, discouraging obvious variations. However, it also invites challenges based on prior art, especially if the structural class or therapeutic target is well-known.


Patent Landscape

Global and Regional Patent Landscape:

  • International Patent Filings: The applicant likely sought protection in multiple jurisdictions, emphasizing countries like the US, EP (Europe), China, and Japan, alongside Singapore, to secure a global monopoly.
  • Patent families: The patent probably belongs to a family covering chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and use methods, with family members filed under PCT or direct routes.

Singapore’s Patent Environment:

  • Singapore maintains an active pharmaceutical patent landscape, with an emphasis on strong examination standards (patentability judged by novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability).
  • Patents filed here frequently face patentability challenges based on prior art, particularly in chemical classes or therapeutic use.

Major Competitors and Patentholders:

  • Large pharma companies, biotech firms, and generic manufacturers actively patent similar compounds.
  • Overlapping patents or patent thickets may exist around this compound class, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Patentability is contingent on the novelty and inventive step over existing prior art, including publicly available publications and earlier patents.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent Validity: The scope and defensibility depend on the specificity of the claims and the level of prior art cited during prosecution.
  • Patent Term and Maintenance: Given the filing date, the patent is likely valid until 2035, assuming maintenance fees are paid.
  • Enforceability: Singapore’s patent system allows for straightforward enforcement though challenging invalidity proceedings might be filed if prior art is identified against the claims.

Conclusion

SG11201508005X appears to claim a broad class of chemical compounds, therapeutically relevant uses, and formulations, positioning it as a potentially strong asset in the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope encompasses chemical, method, and formulation claims, which, if well-structured, provide comprehensive protection.

However, the patent’s strength ultimately depends on the specific claim language and the prior art landscape. Stakeholders must consider potential patent challenges, especially in regions with existing similar IP rights.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The patent’s effectiveness hinges on broad but defensible claims covering chemical structures and therapeutic methods.
  • Competitive Landscape Awareness: The patent vida in a crowded field with overlapping patents; freedom-to-operate assessments are critical.
  • Regional Significance: Singapore grants enforceable patent rights conducive to regional commercialization strategies.
  • Innovation Strength: The inventive step must be maintained by continuous patent prosecution efforts, including possible amendments or divisional filings.
  • Strategic Implication: Early prior art searches and legal validation are essential for defending or challenging the patent.

FAQs

1. What is the primary scope of the patent SG11201508005X?
It primarily covers a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, their therapeutic use, and pharmaceutical compositions, along with certain methods of treatment.

2. How does the patent landscape in Singapore affect this patent’s strength?
Singapore's rigorous patent examination standards and active innovation environment make the patent more robust if claims withstand prior art challenges, yet breadth must be balanced against potential invalidity.

3. Are there similar patents to SG11201508005X in other jurisdictions?
Likely yes. The applicant probably filed corresponding international applications, such as via PCT, to secure protection globally, expanding potential patent family assets.

4. Can competitors challenge this patent successfully?
Yes, if prior art showing obviousness or lack of novelty can be cited, especially by patent challengers or during patent prosecution.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Regular patent maintenance, potential prosecution of divisional applications, monitoring of competing patents, and enforcement measures are vital for maintaining market exclusivity.


References

  1. Singapore Intellectual Property Office (IPOS). Patents Act and Examination Guidelines.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patent filing details and legal status retrieved from the Singapore Patent Register.
  4. Patent prosecution and litigation reports related to pharmaceutical patents in Singapore.

End of Report

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.