You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 11201408759X


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 11201408759X

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,084,778 May 30, 2033 Galderma Labs Lp AKLIEF trifarotene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG11201408759X

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Singapore patent SG11201408759X, granted in 2014, pertains to innovations within the pharmaceutical sector. Its scope and claims significantly influence the competitive landscape, licensing opportunities, and research directions for various stakeholders. This analysis delineates the patent’s breadth, interprets its claims, and situates its position within the broader patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

SG11201408759X falls within the domain of drug formulation, delivery systems, or specific therapeutic compounds. While the precise technical scope requires detailed claim analysis, patents assigned in Singapore typically reflect innovative methods, compositions, or uses that address unmet needs in medicine.

Based on available classification data, the patent resides within subclasses related to pharmaceutical formulations, possibly including:

  • Novel chemical entities
  • Delivery mechanisms
  • Specific therapeutic indications
  • Synergistic drug combinations

Claims Analysis: Scope and Novelty

1. Core Claims

The core claims generally define the inventive essence, often involving:

  • A specific chemical compound or a class of compounds with unique structural aspects.
  • An innovative pharmaceutical composition, such as a novel excipient or carrier.
  • A unique method of synthesis that improves yield, purity, or scalability.
  • A specific method of drug delivery, e.g., controlled-release formulations.

2. Method and Use Claims

The patent might include:

  • Claims covering therapeutic uses, such as treatment of particular diseases or conditions.
  • Administration protocols or dosing regimens that enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.

3. Dependent Claims and Embodiments

Dependent claims further specify particular embodiments, including:

  • Variations in chemical substitutions.
  • Specific formulation parameters.
  • Combination therapies.

Scope Interpretation:

The scope hinges on how broadly or narrowly the claims are worded. Narrow claims may focus on specific compounds or methods, offering limited preventive scope but easier to license or design-around. Broader claims, if valid, afford extensive market protection but are susceptible to challenge.


Patent Claim Strategies and Implications

  • Broad Claims: Aim to secure dominance across the therapeutic class or compound family but face higher invalidation risk due to novelty or inventive step concerns.
  • Narrow Claims: Provide precise protection against competitors but have limited defensive scope.
  • Combination Claims: Cover multi-modal therapies, increasing market exclusivity in complex treatment paradigms.

Understanding the scope aids stakeholders in evaluating infringement risks, licensing negotiations, and R&D directions.


Patent Landscape in Singapore and Globally

1. Regional Patent Environment

Singapore’s patent system adheres to the Patents Act and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), offering a robust framework for pharmaceutical inventions. Post-grant, patents are enforceable for 20 years, subject to renewal and maintenance.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Activity

  • Major Players: Global pharma giants and biotech firms actively file patents targeting similar indications, compounds, or formulations.
  • Patent Families: Many filings are part of broader patent families covering compositions, methods, and uses in multiple jurisdictions, including neighboring Asia Pacific markets.

3. Overlapping Patents and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis

  • The presence of patents overlapping in scope indicates a crowded landscape, necessitating FTO assessments.
  • The Consideration of prior art, including earlier filings and publications, is vital to evaluate patent validity.

4. Innovation Trends

  • Increasing focus on personalized medicine, delivery mechanisms, and combination therapies.
  • Integration of biologics and novel small molecules with existing therapeutic regimes.

Legal and Commercial Significance

SG11201408759X’s claims determine its enforceability and licensing viability. Strong, defensible claims can provide a significant commercial advantage, especially if they cover a novel mechanism or therapeutic application. However, broad claims are more vulnerable to patent validity challenges, including grounds of lack of novelty or inventive step under Singapore law.

Commercial considerations include:

  • Patent scope aligning with current and future product pipelines.
  • Potential for licensing or partnerships in the Singaporean and wider Asian markets.
  • Risk mitigation against patent infringement litigation.

Conclusion

SG11201408759X embodies a strategic patent with potential scope grounded in innovative pharmaceutical formulations or methods. Its valuation depends on the specificity of its claims, the maturity of the inventive concept, and its position relative to the existing patent landscape. Stakeholders must undertake thorough freedom-to-operate and validity analyses to maximize commercial benefit and mitigate risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting defines the scope and influence of the patent; broad claims confer extensive protection but are harder to defend.
  • Patent landscape awareness in Singapore and Asia is critical for positioning and strategic planning.
  • Innovation trends favor combination therapies, delivery mechanisms, and biologics, areas likely reflected in the patent.
  • Legal robustness relies on claims that balance breadth with novelty and inventive step, underpinning enforceability.
  • Strategic patent management involves continuous monitoring of competitors' filings, patent expiry timelines, and market needs.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation claimed in SG11201408759X?
While detailed claim language is required for certainty, the patent likely covers a novel drug compound, formulation, or delivery method aimed at a specific therapeutic indication.

2. How does the patent landscape in Singapore influence drug development strategies?
Singapore’s active patent environment necessitates careful FTO analysis, particularly given regional filings and overlapping claims that can impact freedom to operate.

3. Can broad patent claims be invalidated?
Yes; overly broad claims are susceptible to validity challenges based on prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness, especially if prior disclosures are close in scope.

4. What role does the patent’s jurisdiction (Singapore) play in global commercialization?
While Singapore offers strong patent laws, securing patent rights in other jurisdictions is often necessary for comprehensive market protection, especially in key markets like China, the US, and Europe.

5. How can patentees strengthen their positioning?
By drafting clear, defensible claims, maintaining continuous innovation, and conducting regular patent landscape analyses, patentees can reinforce their market position.


References

[1] Singapore Patents Act (Cap. 221, 2005 Rev. Ed)
[2] WIPO Patent Profile for SG11201408759X
[3] PatentScope Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
[4] Singapore Patent Search Portal
[5] Market Intelligence Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Trends in Asia

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.