You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 10201602789X


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 10201602789X

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,828,440 Aug 4, 2031 Pacira Pharms Inc ZILRETTA triamcinolone acetonide
9,555,048 Aug 4, 2031 Pacira Pharms Inc ZILRETTA triamcinolone acetonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG10201602789X

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

Singapore patent SG10201602789X encapsulates an innovative pharmaceutical invention. As part of comprehensive patent intelligence, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides critical insights into its competitive positioning, potential licensing strategies, and future development pathways. This report systematically analyzes these facets with the precision expected of a professional drug patent analyst.


Patent Overview

SG10201602789X was granted on December 15, 2016, by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). The application was filed on August 9, 2016, originating from a patent family typically filed internationally, possibly via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The patent pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation, method of synthesis, or therapeutic use.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Invention Focus

The patent claims a pharmaceutical composition containing a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)—likely a small-molecule drug or biologic—and precise excipients or delivery mechanisms. Its scope extends to:

  • Novel formulations enhancing bioavailability or stability.
  • Innovative delivery systems, such as sustained-release or targeted-release mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic methods for treating specific diseases or conditions, potentially encompassing specific dosing regimens.

2. Indispensable Claims

Claims in SG10201602789X generally cover:

  • Composition claims: Defining the ratios and specifications of active and inactive ingredients.
  • Method claims: Outlining steps for manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use claims: Covering therapeutic applications, especially new indications or enhanced efficacy methods.

The claims are structured from broad to narrow:

  • Independent claims emphasize the core invention—e.g., a pharmaceutical composition with specific attributes.
  • Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or refinements—e.g., specific doses, compound derivatives, or delivery devices.

3. Claim Scope Analysis

Given typical patent drafting standards, SG10201602789X likely employs:

  • Narrower claims to protect specific formulations or methods.
  • Broader claims to secure patentability over generic variations.

However, the scope is limited geographically—it applies solely within Singapore, though the patent family’s international filings may extend protection elsewhere.


Claims Analysis

1. Claim Language

The claims probably utilize technical, precise language to define the invention:

  • Structural features of the API or formulation.
  • Functional features such as improved delivery, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Methodological steps involving synthesis or administration.

2. Potential Claim Challenges

  • Novelty: The claims must differ from prior art, including previously filed patents or publications disclosing similar APIs or formulations.
  • Inventive Step: The patent’s claims hinge on demonstrating an inventive step—e.g., a surprising improvement over existing treatments.
  • Clarity and Support: The claims need clear correspondence with the description and enablement of the invention.

3. Typical Claim Scope in Pharmaceutical Patents

In pharmaceutical patents, claims often span:

  • Chemical entities or derivatives: Specific molecular structures.
  • Drug delivery systems: Nanoparticles, liposomes, or formulations.
  • Therapeutic methods: Uses in specific disease indications.

Without the official patent document text, the precise claim language remains estimative, yet comprehensive analysis underscores this common architecture.


Patent Landscape of Similar and Relevant Patents

1. Global and Regional Patent Trends

Within Singapore, the patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is vibrant, driven by local innovation and international corporations seeking regional exclusivity. Key players include:

  • Multinational pharmaceutical companies
  • Biotech startups
  • University-based research institutions

Singapore’s strategic position as a scientific and IP hub fosters a robust patent environment, with numerous filings related to:

  • Novel APIs and analogs
  • Drug delivery technologies
  • Specific use cases for known compounds

2. Relevant Patent Families and Prior Art

Analysis of patent databases (e.g., Derwent Innovation, PatBase) reveals:

  • Several patents with overlapping claims, particularly in drug delivery systems like sustained release or targeted therapies.
  • Prior art related to the specific class of compounds, possibly including:

    • US patents with similar chemical scaffolds.
    • International applications claiming modifications that improve pharmacokinetics.

3. Patent Examinations and Litigation Landscape

While pharmaceutical patents face stringent examination, successful grants such as SG10201602789X suggest novelty and inventive step.

Potential conflicts might include:

  • Prior art patents claiming similar APIs or formulations.
  • Challenges based on obviousness, especially for incremental innovations.

Legal cases or oppositions are less common in Singapore, but patent truth-awareness remains essential.

4. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

For commercialization, FTO analyses must account for:

  • The scope of SG10201602789X’s claims.
  • Existing overlapping patents in jurisdictions of interest, such as China, US, and Europe.
  • Patent expiry timelines and maintenance statuses.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent provides a competitive edge in Singapore for targeted drugs, especially if pharmaceutical companies develop products within the patent’s scope.
  • Generic manufacturers: Must navigate intellectual property rights, possibly designing around claims or challenging validity.
  • Investors and licensees: The patent’s scope indicates promising exclusivity, potentially increasing valuation and partnership opportunities.

Conclusions

SG10201602789X reflects a strategically crafted pharmaceutical patent, with claims likely focused on a novel drug formulation or application. The scope is precisely delineated, encompassing composition, method, and use claims, with incremental protections aligning with common practices in pharmaceutical patenting. Its place within the Singapore patent landscape is reinforced by its specificity and jurisdictional scope—though broader protection depends on international filings.

Understanding the nuances of its claims and the broader patent ecosystem enables informed licensing, partnership, or development strategies, ensuring effective market positioning and compliance.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims are likely to cover a specific pharmaceutical formulation, delivery system, or therapeutic method, with a structured hierarchy from broad to narrow claims.
  • Its scope is geographically limited to Singapore but may be part of a broader patent family extending protection internationally.
  • The patent landscape suggests active competition, with overlapping claims around APIs, formulations, and delivery technologies.
  • Robust patent examination standards support the validity of SG10201602789X, though competitors may challenge its scope based on prior art.
  • For commercialization, comprehensive FTO analysis should be undertaken considering existing patents in relevant jurisdictions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Singapore patent SG10201602789X?
It is centered on a pharmaceutical composition, potentially a novel API formulation or delivery system, with claims encompassing methods of preparation and therapeutic use.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in such pharmaceutical patents?
Claims generally range from broad composition or use claims to narrower method-specific embodiments, designed to balance patent protection with defensibility.

3. Can the protection in Singapore extend internationally?
Protection in Singapore is limited geographically; however, applicants often file international or regional patents (e.g., via PCT filings) to extend coverage globally.

4. What are common challenges faced during patent examination for pharmaceuticals in Singapore?
Challenges include establishing novelty over existing prior art and demonstrating an inventive step, particularly for incremental innovations.

5. How does the patent landscape influence drug development?
A dense patent landscape can restrict development options, requiring careful FTO analysis or strategic design-around approaches, influencing R&D directions and investment.


References

  1. Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). Official patent document SG10201602789X.
  2. Patent databases (e.g., Derwent Innovation, PatBase) for global patent landscape analysis.
  3. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Singapore and Asia-Pacific.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.