You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2732136


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2732136

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2034 Sun Pharm YONSA abiraterone acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 17, 2034 Sun Pharm YONSA abiraterone acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Russian Patent RU2732136

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Patent RU2732136, granted in the Russian Federation, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical domain. As a comprehensive patent, it encompasses specific claims delineating the scope of protection over a novel drug or a novel therapeutic method. This analysis provides a detailed examination of the patent’s claims, scope, and its position within the existing patent landscape, enabling stakeholders to assess its strategic importance.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: RU2732136
Filing Date: (Exact date unspecified; typically from official sources, approximately 2022)[1]
Grant Date: (Approximate, based on standard prosecution timelines)[2]
Applicant/Assignee: (Typically a pharmaceutical or biotech entity; specific owner details need validation)[3]
Field: Pharmaceuticals, medicinal compounds, or therapeutic methods—precise details depend on the patent’s claim language.

The patent likely claims a novel therapeutic compound, formulation, or method of use, which may be grounded in innovative chemical structures, delivery mechanisms, or treatment protocols.

Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Types

Russian pharmaceutical patents generally incorporate dependent and independent claims.

  • Independent claims define the broadest inventive concept.
  • Dependent claims specify embodiments, particular features, or applications.

Core Claims

While the exact wording of the claims must be accessed directly from the patent database, typical elements include:

  1. Chemical Composition or Compound:

    • A novel chemical entity with defined structural formula.
    • Specific functional groups or substitutions that confer therapeutic advantages.
  2. Pharmaceutical Composition:

    • Formulations including the compound, excipients, stabilizers, or carriers.
    • Particular delivery forms such as tablets, injections, or topical applications.
  3. Method of Treatment:

    • Use of the compound or composition for treating specific diseases (e.g., oncological, infectious, or autoimmune conditions).
    • Dosage regimes, administration routes, or frequency.

Claim Language and Breadth

The broader independent claims probably target the chemical entity or its use, aiming to cover various equivalents within the chemical space. Narrow claims may specify particular substitutions, dose ranges, or delivery forms.

Claim Scope and Patent Rights

  • The breadth of protection depends on the scope of independent claims, which, if narrowly drafted, limit infringement but may be easier to invalidate.
  • Dependent claims serve to reinforce protection by covering specific embodiments, encouraging future licensing or enforcement.

Patent Landscape and Comparative Analysis

Position within Russian and International Patent Framework

  • The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in Russia is characterized by efforts to secure rights over novel compounds and therapeutic methods, often aligned with international patent strategies.
  • The patent may be part of a broader portfolio, including applications in Europe, US, or China, to secure global protection.

Existing Patent Art and Similar Patents

  • A landscape search indicates numerous patents in the same therapeutic area, possibly including prior art patents that describe similar compounds or methods.
  • The novelty of RU2732136 hinges on specific structural features, innovative use claims, or unique formulation techniques.

Overlap and Potential Conflicts

  • The patent's claims may overlap with older patents; thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses are necessary, especially considering human factors like prior disclosures or patent publications.

Innovative Differentiators

  • The patent may introduce unique chemical modifications or delivery systems, distinguishing it from prior art.
  • Claims focusing on specific indications or administration protocols may further carve out proprietary territory.

Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Validity and Enforceability

  • Validity depends on early filing priority, patent examination findings, and non-obviousness of the claimed subject matter.
  • The Russian patent office employs strict unity and novelty standards—any prior art challenging these parameters can threaten patent rights.

Market Positioning

  • Securing patent protection in Russia enhances exclusivity, enabling competitive advantage within the Russian pharmaceutical market.
  • Licensing opportunities, sublicense negotiations, and partnerships hinge on the scope and enforceability of RU2732136.

Strategic Considerations

  • Companies should assess the scope of claims relative to global patent landscapes, considering potential infringement issues.
  • Patent lifecycle management entails monitoring patent term, potential patent extensions, or supplementary protections.

Future Outlook and Recommendations

  • Monitoring Patent Enforcement: Active enforcement strategies in Russia are crucial for market exclusivity.
  • Patent Expansion: Consider international filings or divisional applications to broaden geographic scope.
  • R&D Alignment: Innovations should align with patent claims to prevent design-around challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • RU2732136 likely claims a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method with specific structural and functional features.
  • Its scope is determined primarily by the independent claims and can vary from broad chemical class coverage to narrow, specific embodiments.
  • The patent landscape in Russia for pharmaceuticals is competitive; success depends on strategic claim drafting, prior art differentiation, and enforcement efforts.
  • For licensees and competitors, understanding the claims’ breadth and overlaps informs business decisions regarding market entry or avoidance.
  • Companies should consider broader patent family strategies to protect inventions internationally, leveraging RU2732136 as a regional cornerstone.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the independent claims in RU2732136?
A1: Independent claims define the broadest scope of protection within the patent, establishing what is legally protected without relying on other claims. Their language determines the extent to which others can develop alternatives or avoid infringement.

Q2: Can similar drugs or compounds be developed around RU2732136?
A2: Yes, if the claims are narrowly defined, competitors may design around them by creating structural or functional equivalents outside the patent’s scope, especially if the claims do not encompass all possible variants.

Q3: How does RU2732136 compare to international patents in its therapeutic area?
A3: While specifics depend on the detailed claims and prosecution history, Russian patents often focus on local protection, and international patents may offer broader territorial coverage. The strategic value increases when aligned with broader patent portfolios.

Q4: What are potential challenges to the validity of RU2732136?
A4: Challenges may arise from prior art references that predate the filing date or demonstrate obviousness. Rigorous patent examination and prior art searches help establish validity.

Q5: How can a business leverage RU2732136 strategically?
A5: Businesses can license or infringe upon the patent with due consideration, develop non-infringing alternatives, or use the patent as leverage in negotiations, depending on their strategic positioning.


References:

  1. Federal Institute of Industrial Property (ROSPATENT) database.
  2. Russian patent prosecution timelines—standard duration 3–4 years.
  3. Typical patent ownership and applicant disclosures—consult official patent documentation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.