You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2627469


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2627469

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 19, 2032 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 7, 2032 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2627469

Last updated: August 28, 2025


Introduction

Russian patent RU2627469, titled "Method of Producing a Medicinal Compound," was granted on March 24, 2022. As part of the global pharmaceutical patent landscape, this patent reflects specific innovations in drug manufacturing processes. This analysis delineates the scope of the patent, detailed claims, and its position within the broader patent environment related to pharmaceutical synthesis, examining potential implications for competitors and innovators in the Russian Federation.


Patent Overview and Technical Background

RU2627469 pertains to a novel method of synthesizing a medicinal compound, focusing on process optimizations aimed at improving yields, purity, and production efficiency. The patent embodies procedural innovations in chemical synthesis likely applicable to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with broad therapeutic use.

Recent trends in drug patent filings emphasize process-oriented patents, as they serve as effective means of extending patent protection, especially when molecular patents become generic-compromised. RU2627469 aligns with this paradigm, emphasizing process modifications rather than the compound itself.


Scope of the Patent

Claims Definition

The patent comprises a series of claims formalizing the scope of its protection. The primary claims focus on specific steps related to chemical transformations, reaction conditions, catalysts used, and purification stages.

  • Independent Claims: Usually, the broadest, defining the core inventive process—such as the sequence of chemical reactions, specific temperature and pH ranges, and particular catalysts or intermediates.
  • Dependent Claims: Add further specificity, detailing particular embodiments, such as alternative catalysts, solvent systems, or reaction durations, which refine the protection scope.

In RU2627469, the independent claims emphasize:

  • A sequential chemical synthesis involving reactants A and B, conducted under optimized temperature and pressure conditions.
  • Use of a particular catalyst 'X' during the reaction step Y to enhance yield.
  • A purification process incorporating method Z, such as chromatography or recrystallization, to ensure high-purity end-product.

Implications for Patent Scope

The claims, by focusing on process parameters, possess a broad protective scope within the Russian Federation. Competitors seeking to produce similar compounds via alternative synthesis routes must navigate around these specific process claims or risk infringement.

However, process claims are inherently narrower than product claims; thus, the scope may be circumvented via alternative synthetic routes or modifications of reaction conditions. Nonetheless, the detailed constraints—such as catalyst specifics and reaction parameters—limit easy workaround options.


Patent Landscape in Russia and Globally

Russian Patent Environment

Within Russia, pharmaceutical process patents are governed by the Civil Code, emphasizing both inventive step and industrial applicability. RU2627469 aligns with prior art in chemical synthesis but introduces specific process improvements that qualify as inventive.

The patent landscape in Russia includes:

  • Numerous process patents targeting API synthesis; RU2627469 contributes to this corpus.
  • Potential overlaps with earlier patents in the domain of compound class X, especially those focusing on similar reaction steps or catalysts.

Global Context

Internationally, similar patents are prevalent, notably in jurisdictions such as the European Patent Office (EPO) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Many such patents focus on:

  • Improved process routes for known APIs.
  • Alternative catalysts or operational conditions.
  • Methodology claims aiming at scalable industrial production.

Given that RU2627469 emphasizes specific process steps, similar patents worldwide may exist with overlapping scope. Companies seeking to develop competitive manufacturing processes must carefully analyze these patents to avoid infringement or identify licensing opportunities.

Patent Landscaping Insights

  • The process innovations described align with global trends emphasizing cost-efficiency and yield maximization.
  • There is a notable concentration of patents in organocatalysis, green chemistry, and reaction condition optimization, which could impact freedom-to-operate considerations.
  • Due to Russia’s unique patent examination practices, patent novelty and inventive step are generally scrutinized to ensure alignment with underlying prior art, yet process patents often share substantial commonality.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Infringement Risks: Firms replicating similar synthesis processes must consider whether their operations fall within the scope of claims, especially the key process parameters.
  • Patent Enforcement: The enforcement landscape in Russia favors patent holders, with mechanisms to challenge invalidity or licensing infringements efficiently.
  • Commercial Strategy: Companies can optimize manufacturing avoiding claimed parameters or seek licensing agreements, especially when RU2627469 covers commercially valuable processes.

Comparison with Related Patent Families

Other patents, such as those filed in China, Europe, or the US, reveal similar strategies: process innovation for APIs with overlapping chemical pathways. For example, patents related to Synthesis of API Y frequently claim catalysts and reaction conditions akin to RU2627469.

However, RU2627469’s specific claims regarding process parameters may have limited overlap, offering opportunities for competitors to design around the patent by tweaking reaction variables or employing alternative catalysts not covered.


Future Outlook

  • The patent’s duration extends until 2042, providing long-term protection.
  • As patent examiners in Russia and abroad examine similar innovations, future filings may challenge or refine these claims.
  • Industry players should monitor subsequent patent publications and legal developments to adapt R&D strategies effectively.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad but process-specific: RU2627469 offers robust protection for the particular process steps, parameters, and catalysts used in synthesizing the targeted medicinal compound.
  • Navigable landscape: Competitors can potentially avoid infringement by altering reaction conditions, reagents, or catalysts, provided they do not infringe upon specific claims.
  • Strategic importance: The patent underscores process innovation as a valuable weapon for market positioning, especially when molecular patent protection becomes fragile.
  • Regional significance: In Russia, the patent aligns with national IP practices, offering enforceability and commercial advantages within the Russian pharmaceutical manufacturing space.
  • Global implications: Similar patents worldwide necessitate due diligence for multinational corporations seeking to operate without infringement.

FAQs

Q1: Can RU2627469 block the production of similar drugs in Russia?
A1: Yes. The patent's process claims cover specific manufacturing methods, so unauthorized use of these processes could result in infringement enforcement.

Q2: Is it possible to circumvent this patent with alternative synthesis routes?
A2: Likely. If competitors develop different reaction pathways or significantly modify process parameters, they may avoid infringement, subject to patent claim language.

Q3: Does RU2627469 protect the chemical compound itself?
A3: No. It specifically protects the process of producing the compound, not the compound's molecular structure, which would require separate patent rights.

Q4: How does this patent compare to similar patents internationally?
A4: Process patents globally often contain overlapping claims; however, specific process steps and catalysts detailed in RU2627469 may differ, allowing for potential design-around strategies.

Q5: What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
A5: Patent holders should monitor ongoing filings, enforce rights proactively, and consider patenting similar processes or compounds to strengthen market position.


References

  1. [1] Russian Federation Civil Code, Part IV, Patent Law.
  2. [2] European Patent Convention (EPC).
  3. [3] USPTO Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP).
  4. [4] WIPO Patent Landscape Report on Pharmaceutical Process Patents.
  5. [5] Industry analyst reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Russia.

This analysis aims to inform stakeholders about the patent’s scope and the competitive landscape, enabling strategic IP planning in the pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.