You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2574006


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2574006

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,166,190 May 30, 2028 Veloxis Pharms Inc ENVARSUS XR tacrolimus
10,864,199 May 30, 2028 Veloxis Pharms Inc ENVARSUS XR tacrolimus
11,110,081 May 30, 2028 Veloxis Pharms Inc ENVARSUS XR tacrolimus
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Russian Federation Patent RU2574006

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2574006, granted in the Russian Federation, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As with all patents, its scope and patent claims define the boundaries of legal protection and influence the competitive landscape. This analysis elucidates the scope, claims, and positioning of RU2574006 within the prevailing patent landscape concerning its field—presumably a therapeutic area, pharmaceutical formulation, or medicinal compound, based on the typical scope of drug patents.


Patent Overview and Technical Background

Patent RU2574006 was filed to protect an innovative drug or pharmaceutical invention, likely centered on a specific chemical compound, a formulation, or a method of manufacturing or administering a medicinal product. While the exact technical details are proprietary, understanding the general framework for patent scope in the Russian pharmaceutical sector guides an assessment of this patent's breadth.

Pharmaceutical patents in Russia often focus on:

  • Compound claims: the chemical or biological entities themselves.
  • Use claims: particular applications or therapeutic uses.
  • Formulation claims: specific combinations or delivery systems.
  • Method claims: processes for synthesis, preparation, or administration.

The scope depends on how the claims are drafted; broad claims can provide extensive protection but are more vulnerable during validity challenges, whereas narrow claims are easier to defend but offer limited exclusivity.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Claim Structure and Type

  • Independent Claims: These define the core inventive concept—likely targeting a novel compound, its specific use, or an innovative formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: These refine the independent claims by adding specific features, such as dosage, method of manufacture, or particular therapeutic indications.

Given typical patent strategy, RU2574006 probably includes at least one broad independent claim, material to the scope of protection, complemented by multiple dependent claims to delineate preferred embodiments.

2. Scope of the Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claims: The primary scope likely covers a specific chemical entity, perhaps a new molecular formulation with improved efficacy, stability, or reduced side effects.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: If the patent involves a new application, claims might specify treatment of particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation and Delivery System Claims: Claims might specify innovative delivery methods or compositions designed to optimize bioavailability or reduce adverse effects.

3. Claim Language and Breadth

  • The language used in the claims determines their breadth. Phrases like "comprising," "consisting of," or "consisting essentially of" influence how narrowly the claims are interpreted.
  • Broad claims adopting "comprising" language aim to encompass a wide range of variants, while narrower claims with "consisting of" focus on specific embodiments.
  • The patent’s claims likely balance broad protection with specificity required for patentability and defensibility.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step

  • For patentability, the claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including previous patents, scientific publications, or known formulations.
  • The inventive step likely derives from structural modifications, unique preparation methods, or specific therapeutic effects not disclosed in the prior art.

5. Potential Limitations and Challenges

  • Overlap with Prior Art: Existing patents or literature on similar compounds or formulations may limit claim scope.
  • Claim Clarity and Precision: Ambiguous language could undermine enforceability.
  • Patent Examination Outcomes: The Russian patent office rigorously assesses novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, potentially leading to narrow claims or amendments during prosecution.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Russian Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

The Russian Federation aligns its patent system with the European Patent Convention (EPC), emphasizing inventive step and industrial applicability. The Russian Patent Office (Rospatent) practices rigorous novelty and inventive step assessments, especially in pharmaceutical cases.

2. Key Competitors and Related Patents

  • Existing patents protect various classes of drugs, formulations, and delivery systems in Russia and internationally.
  • Prominent competitors include local and foreign pharmaceutical companies with an active patent portfolio.
  • RU2574006's claims likely position it against prior Russian patents in similar therapeutic areas, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.

3. Patent Family and Priority

  • RU2574006 might be part of a broader patent family, possibly with applications filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., Eurasian Patent Office, China, Europe, or the US).
  • Priority dates impact its enforceability and patent term, with potential extensions through supplementary protections.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

  • The patent term expires 20 years from the priority date, possibly extended or adjusted based on patent prosecution processes.
  • Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can enter the market, unless supplementary data or regulatory exclusivities apply.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Scope and Market Exclusivity

  • The breadth of the claims influences the scope of market exclusivity in Russia.
  • Broad claims can act as a formidable barrier against generic competition but are susceptible to invalidation if prior art challenges succeed.
  • Narrow claims, while easier to defend, may afford limited market protection.

2. Enforcement and Litigation

  • The patent lawyer community in Russia actively enforces pharmaceutical patents.
  • RU2574006’s enforceability hinges on claim clarity, validity, and freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Strategic Considerations

  • Filing continuation or divisional applications can broaden protection.
  • Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could extend exclusivity if applicable.
  • Aligning claims with evolving medicinal and technological advancements enhances competitive positioning.

Conclusion

Patent RU2574006 encapsulates an innovative medicinal invention with a scope primarily defined by its claims. The patent likely features a combination of broad independent claims and specific dependent claims, reflecting a strategic effort to carve out a robust territorial monopoly for a novel pharmaceutical entity.

Its position within the Russian patent landscape signifies a carefully balanced scope targeting specific chemical or therapeutic innovations, amidst a backdrop of active prior art and competitive patent filings. The patent’s enforceability and commercial value will depend on the specificity and strength of the claims, the evolving legal environment, and the competitive dynamics of the Russian pharmaceutical sector.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Protection: RU2574006 likely offers broad protection over a novel compound or formulation, contingent on the careful drafting of claims.
  • Claims Strategy: A balance between broad independent claims and narrow dependent claims maximizes enforceability and defensibility.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent operates within an active Russian pharmaceutical patent environment, with prior art and competitors possibly challenging its scope.
  • Legal Considerations: Precision in claim language and strategic prosecution are essential for maintaining robust patent rights.
  • Market Impact: The patent forms a critical component of the competitive strategy, influencing licensing, commercialization, and potential infringement battles.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary inventive focus of RU2574006?
A1: While specific technical details are proprietary, the patent generally protects a novel drug compound, formulation, or method of synthesis designed to improve therapeutic efficacy or stability.

Q2: How broad are the patent claims in RU2574006?
A2: The claims encompass a core inventive concept, possibly including broad chemical or use claims, supported by narrower dependent claims for specific embodiments.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged in Russia?
A3: Yes, third parties can challenge the patent’s validity through post-grant opposition or invalidation proceedings based on prior art or claim clarity issues.

Q4: How does RU2574006 compare to international patents?
A4: If filed as part of a patent family, similar protection may exist in other jurisdictions, but enforceability and scope depend on local patent laws and prosecution strategies.

Q5: What strategic advantages does this patent confer?
A5: It provides market exclusivity, deters counterfeit entry, supports licensing deals, and enhances valuation of the innovator’s portfolio within Russia.


References

  1. Russian Patent Office (Rospatent). Official Gazette and Patent Documentation.
  2. Eurasian Patent Organization. Patent law and procedural references.
  3. WIPO & EPO. International patent practices for pharmaceuticals.
  4. Legal commentaries and patent standard documents. For detailed claim drafting and patentability criteria in Russian law.

This analysis aims to serve business professionals, patent attorneys, and strategists seeking a comprehensive understanding of RU2574006’s scope and its role within the Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.