You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2422445


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2422445

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,851,482 Jul 10, 2029 Endo Pharms OPANA ER oxymorphone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2422445

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Russian patent RU2422445 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation filed within the Russian Federation, providing legal protection for a specific drug invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape is essential for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and competitors—to evaluate its market impact, freedom to operate, and potential for licensing or infringement challenges. This detailed analysis explores the patent's core features, claims, and its position within Russia’s evolving pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Basic Information

Patent Number: RU2422445
Application Filing Date: (Assumed approximated for this analysis; precise date as per official registry)
Publication Date: (Typically 18 months post-filing; precise date to be verified in official patent documents)
Patent Status: Grant or pending (dependent on official verification)
Ownership: (Specific assignee details should be confirmed through the official patent database)
Field of Invention: Medical/pharmaceutical—specifically, a novel drug formulation or compound.

In Russia, pharmaceutical patents primarily fall under the scope of the Civil Code, particularly Articles 1365 to 1381 concerning inventions, utility models, and patent rights. The legal framework aligns with international standards introduced by the TRIPS Agreement, which Russia is a member of.


Scope of the Patent:

Type of Invention

RU2422445 protects a specific drug compound, formulation, or medical use. The scope could cover:

  • A new chemical entity or derivative with curative or preventative properties.
  • A novel pharmaceutical composition, possibly comprising active ingredients, excipients, or combinations.
  • A specific method of preparation or administration.
  • New therapeutic methods or indications involving the compound.

The scope's breadth depends largely on how broadly claims are drafted—ranging from narrowly defined by specific chemical structures or dosage forms to broader claims covering related compositions or methods.

Patent Claims Analysis

The claims form the patent’s backbone. They define the extent of legal protection and influence licensing, infringement, and litigation strategies.

Independent Claims

Typically, independent claims in pharmaceutical patents specify:

  • The chemical structure of the active compound.
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing the compound.
  • A method of treatment using the compound or composition.
  • A specific dosage or formulation.

Example (hypothetical):
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X of formula I, wherein said compound exhibits activity for treating disease Y."

The scope here would encompass any composition containing compound X, used in specified treatments.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the invention, adding further specific features:

  • Purity levels
  • Specific formulation techniques
  • Manufacturing processes
  • Usage in certain patient groups

This layered structure enhances patent defensibility and commercial flexibility.

Claim Drafting Considerations

The patent’s scope hinges on the drafting quality:

  • Broad claims afford maximum protection but may face challenges for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrower claims provide more robust protection for specific embodiments, but may be easier for competitors to circumvent.

Given Russia’s recent emphasis on strict patentability standards, especially concerning pharmaceuticals, claims are often crafted with a balance between breadth and defensibility, aligning with European and WTO patent norms.


Patent Landscape:

Current Patent Environment in Russia

Russia's pharmaceutical patent landscape has seen significant evolution:

  • Increased recognition of biotech and chemical innovations since accession to the WTO in 2012.
  • Stricter examination standards emphasizing inventiveness, novelty, and industrial applicability.
  • Growing emphasis on local innovation driven by government initiatives like the "Pharma 2020" strategy.

Competitor Patents and Prior Art

A thorough landscape requires analyzing prior art:

  • International patents (e.g., US, EP, WIPO patents) covering similar compounds or formulations.
  • Russian-specific prior art, including existing medicines, research publications, and prior applications.
  • Potential common structural motifs or related therapeutic methods in the Russian and global patent spaces.

If RU2422445 claims a novel compound, its novelty will be challenged against existing chemical libraries and publications. If it pertains to a new use or formulation, prior usage in relevant medical literature becomes relevant.

Patent Family and International Application

It’s crucial to ascertain whether RU2422445 is part of an international patent family or if equivalent applications exist in other jurisdictions. This informs on:

  • The breadth of protection globally.
  • The potential for patent extensions or patent pendency strategies.
  • Opportunities for licensing agreements or defensive patenting.

Legal Status and Maintenance

Monitoring the patent’s maintenance status is vital. Non-maintenance or lapses could open pathways for generic development. Conversely, active enforcement reinforces market exclusivity.


Implications for Stakeholders:

  • For Innovators: Understanding the scope aids in positioning the novel compound within the Russian market and assessing potential infringement risks.
  • For Generics Manufacturers: Recognizing patent claims helps evaluate the feasibility for designing around the patent or challenging validity.
  • For Legal Practitioners: Analyzing claim language and prior art supports patent validity assessments and infringement disputes.
  • For Policymakers: The patent’s scope impacts access, innovation incentives, and commercialization strategies within Russia.

Legal Challenges and Opportunities

Given the current Russian patent landscape, patents like RU2422445 face potential challenges:

  • Invalidity Actions: Based on lack of inventive step or novelty, especially if prior art predates the filing.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Thorough analysis required to avoid infringement, especially when similar compounds are prevalent.
  • Patent Extension and Supplementary Protection: Opportunities for term extensions may be limited but could be explored for maximizing exclusivity.

Conversely, the patent offers opportunities:

  • Market exclusivity for the protected compound or formulation.
  • Licensing revenues through strategic partnerships.
  • Portfolio expansion with related patents or method claims.

Conclusion

RU2422445 exemplifies Russia’s strategic approach to protecting pharmaceutical inventions, balancing stringent novelty and inventive step requirements with the need to promote local innovation. Its scope likely encompasses the core compound, formulations, and uses, although precise claim language determines the exact protection.

For effective monetization and risk management, stakeholders must closely examine the patent’s claims, compare them against prior art, and monitor legal developments within the Russian patent landscape. As Russia continues aligning its IP standards with international best practices, such patents are expected to play a pivotal role in shaping the pharmaceutical industry.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: Precise claim drafting defines the patent’s protection; broad claims confer extensive rights but are more vulnerable to validity challenges.
  • Patent Landscape: RU2422445 operates within a competitive environment increasingly aligned with international patent standards, necessitating vigilant prior art searches.
  • Legal and Commercial Strategies: Patent validity assessment, infringement risk analysis, and strategic licensing are vital for leveraging the patent’s value.
  • Market Impact: The patent can secure exclusivity for novel compounds or formulations but requires ongoing legal monitoring.
  • Innovation Incentives: Russian patent policies continue to evolve, emphasizing the importance of strong, defensible patent rights for pharmaceutical innovation.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical validity period of RU2422445, and how can it be extended?
    The standard patent term in Russia is 20 years from the filing date. Extensions are generally limited but may be available for pharmaceutical inventions under certain conditions, such as supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) analogous to the European system.

  2. Can RU2422445 be challenged for invalidity, and on what grounds?
    Yes. Challenges can be based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or industrial applicability, often requiring prior art analysis.

  3. Does this patent cover only the chemical compound or also formulations and methods?
    Probable scope includes the core compound, but dependent claims may extend coverage to specific formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes.

  4. How does RU2422445 compare to similar international patents?
    Its international family size and overlap depend on prior filings Elsewhere. A comprehensive search would clarify patent family members and regional protections.

  5. What strategic considerations should pharmaceutical companies have regarding RU2422445?
    Evaluate the scope for infringement, opportunities for licensing, or designing around claims. Continuous monitoring of legal statuses and prior art remains essential.


References

[1] Russian Civil Code, Articles 1365–1381 (Inventions and Utility Models).
[2] Russian Patent Office (ROSPATENT) official database.
[3] WIPO PatentScope database.
[4] European Patent Office (EPO) patent documents.
[5] Industry reports on Russian pharmaceutical patent trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.