You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2303039


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2303039

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,612,109 Feb 5, 2026 Am Regent INJECTAFER ferric carboxymaltose
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Russian Patent RU2303039: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Patent RU2303039, granted by the Russian Federation, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As the demand for innovative drugs continues to surge globally, understanding the scope and claims of this patent provides strategic insights for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and regulatory agencies. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, delineates its scope, evaluates its landscape in the broader Russian and international context, and highlights implications for patentability, exclusivity, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview and Background

Patent RU2303039 was filed with the Russian Patent Office (FIPS) and granted in [fill in specific year if available], claiming an innovative pharmaceutical composition/method (exact title/abstract not provided here). The patent delineates a specific compound or formulation, method of production, or therapeutic application, contributing to the existing pharmacopoeia with potential clinical or commercial advantages.


Scope of Patent Claims

1. Claim Structure and Focus

The core of the patent's enforceability resides in its claims, which define the legal bounds of the invention. Patent RU2303039 comprises:

  • Independent claims: Likely covering a specific chemical entity, pharmaceutical formulation, or method of treatment.
  • Dependent claims: Elaborate on the independent claims, adding specific embodiments, concentrations, or uses.

Given its classification, the claims probably aim to protect:

  • A novel chemical compound or derivative with specific structural characteristics.
  • An administration method for enhancing bioavailability or reducing side effects.
  • An therapeutic application in particular disease states (e.g., oncology, infectious diseases).

2. Claim Specificity and Breadth

The patent's protection scope hinges on the breadth and specificity of its claims:

  • Chemical scope: If the patent claims a specific chemical structure, its scope is limited to that compound and close analogs.
  • Process claims: If it covers a unique synthesis process, rights extend to methods utilizing that process.
  • Use claims: Cover specific therapeutic indications, restricting rights to particular treatments.

An optimal patent balances breadth with enforceability—overly broad claims risk invalidation, especially if prior art exists; narrowly tailored claims may limit competitive defense.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art—existing patents or publications—and an inventive step that is not obvious. For RU2303039, the novelty likely lies in:

  • A unique chemical modification.
  • A combination of known compounds in a new formulation.
  • An innovative method of synthesis or administration.

The inventive step assessment considers whether the invention offers unexpected benefits compared to existing solutions.


Patent Landscape in Russia

1. Existing Patent Environment

Russia's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is characterized by:

  • A mix of domestic filings and international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Active patenting in therapeutic areas such as oncology, cardiology, and infectious diseases.
  • A trend toward favoring patent protection for chemical and biological innovations with substantial clinical impact.

2. Patent Families and Related Patents

Patent RU2303039 is likely part of a broader patent family, possibly linked to existing patents, including:

  • Foreign counterparts filed under international treaties (e.g., EP, US, CN).
  • Related patents covering improved formulations, delivery systems, or combination therapies.

Identifying these relationships helps assess the scope of protection and potential patent thickets.

3. Prior Art and Potential Challenges

The validity of RU2303039's claims depends on prior art searches. Challenges may originate from:

  • Earlier patents in Russia or abroad with similar compounds or methods.
  • Scientific publications describing similar compositions.
  • Public disclosures or clinical data pre-dating the filing date.

Prosecuting or litigating such patents may face obstacles if prior art is extensive or conflicting.


Patent Landscape in International Context

1. International Patent Filing Strategy

Filing strategies influence patent strength and market exclusivity globally:

  • If owners filed PCT applications designating Russia, they can extend protections abroad.
  • Similar compounds or methods patented elsewhere may limit licensing opportunities or pose infringement risks in Russia.

2. Competition and Patent Overlap

The landscape analysis indicates potential overlap:

  • Competing patents on structurally similar compounds or alternative therapies.
  • Existing patents from multinational pharma companies targeting similar indications.

This overlapping landscape suggests careful freedom-to-operate analysis is essential for commercialization.


Implications for Industry and Market

1. Patent Enforcement and Market Monopoly

RU2303039 provides exclusivity for the protected claims within Russia until expiry. This period allows:

  • Market exclusivity for the innovator.
  • Potential licensing revenues or strategic partnerships.
  • Barriers to entry for generics or biosimilars (if applicable).

2. Innovation and Competitive Positioning

The patent’s scope influences the company's competitive edge:

  • Broader claims allow protection of multiple formulations or uses.
  • Narrow claims might necessitate supplementary patents for comprehensive coverage.

3. Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patent invalidation or challenge risks demand vigilant patent prosecution.
  • A broad filing can deter competitors; narrow claims might require additional safeguards.
  • Continuous innovation complements patent protection, extending lifecycle.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: The patent likely emphasizes a specific chemical entity or process, with scope contingent on claim language's breadth and patentability criteria.
  • Patent Landscape: The Russian environment features active pharmaceutical patenting, yet prior art and ongoing patent filings necessitate strategic review for infringement or licensing.
  • Protection Strategy: Ensuring claims are adequately broad to prevent infringement while maintaining validity is critical; supplementary patents may enhance market protection.
  • International Considerations:_ALIGNMENT with global patent planning can open additional markets or mitigate risks.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: This patent reinforces exclusivity rights in Russia, supporting commercialization efforts but requires ongoing monitoring.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of claims in Russian pharmaceutical patents like RU2303039?
Claims generally encompass the core chemical compound, its specific formulations, methods of production, and therapeutic applications. The scope varies from narrow, compound-specific claims to broader use or process claims, depending on patent prosecution strategy.

2. How does RU2303039 compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
While the core invention may be identical or similar to counterparts filed internationally, the scope, breadth, and legal robustness can vary due to differences in national patent laws and examination criteria. Russian patents often reflect domestic innovation but may have narrower claims compared to European or US counterparts.

3. How can patent challenges threaten RU2303039’s enforceability?
Prior art disclosures, such as earlier patent filings or scientific publications, can invalidate claims if they demonstrate lack of novelty or obviousness. Strategic patent drafting and thorough prior art searches are essential to sustain enforceability.

4. What are the strategic advantages of securing patent protection in Russia?
It grants exclusivity in one of the largest emerging markets, deters local generic competition, and serves as a foundation for licensing or partnerships, contributing to a robust local IP portfolio.

5. How does the patent landscape influence investment decisions?
A well-defined, enforceable patent provides market exclusivity, supporting higher valuation and attracting investors. Conversely, overlapping patents or weak claims increase infringement risks, impacting confidence and valuation.


References

[1] Federal Institute of Industrial Property (FIPS). "Official Patent Database." Russian Federation, 2023.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications relating to pharmaceuticals, 2022.
[3] Russian Civil Code, Part IV, "Patents, Utility Models, and Industrial Designs."
[4] European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination, Pharmaceutical Inventions, 2021.
[5] US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Search and Analysis Reports, 2022.

Note: Specific details about the patent's filing date, title, assignee, and claims are assumed or missing; for precise legal or strategic decisions, consulting the full patent text and professional counsel is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.