You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2010129460


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2010129460

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 28, 2027 Actelion TRACLEER bosentan
⤷  Get Started Free May 15, 2026 Actelion TRACLEER bosentan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2010129460

Last updated: September 18, 2025


Introduction

Russian Federation patent RU2010129460 discloses intellectual property rights related to a specific pharmaceutical invention. The patent's legal scope, specific claims, and its position within the global patent landscape substantially influence its commercial viability, enforceability, and potential for licensing. This analysis explores the patent’s scope, claims, and competitive landscape with a focus on its novelty, inventive step, and strategic importance within the pharmaceutical sector.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

Patent RU2010129460 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method designed for therapeutic purposes. Although the detailed description is proprietary, similar patents generally focus on active ingredients, formulations, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic methods—each with varying degrees of protection.

The patent appears to be rooted in the field of biopharmaceuticals or chemical compounds, likely aiming to address unmet medical needs or provide innovative formulations with improved efficacy, safety, or manufacturing processes.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Types

Claims define the legal boundaries of the patent. They can be categorized into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims establish the broadest scope of the invention.
  • Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or narrower scopes based on the independent claims.

Assessment of Scope:

  1. Claim Breadth and Language:
    Typical pharmaceutical patents claim chemically defined compounds, compositions, or treatment methods. The broadness largely depends on the claim language. If RU2010129460's claims are drafted narrowly—focusing on specific compounds or formulations—they limit enforceability but reduce potential invalidation risks. Conversely, broader claims covering entire classes of compounds or methods can provide extensive protection but potentially face higher validity challenges.

  2. Scope of Active Ingredients or Methods:
    The claim scope likely encompasses:

    • Specific chemical entities with defined molecular structures.
    • Particular combinations with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
    • Specific dosing or administration routes.
    • Therapeutic indications (e.g., certain diseases).
  3. Scope of the Claims:
    The patent possibly protects the composition, the manufacturing process, and/or therapeutic method involving the invention. The balance between these claims impacts licensing, infringement, and enforcement strategies.

Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

  • Novelty:
    To be granted, RU2010129460 must introduce features not previously disclosed. Given prior art such as existing compounds, formulations, or methods, the patent must demonstrate non-obvious differences to overcome prior art objections.

  • Inventive Step:
    Russian patent law considers whether the invention demonstrates an inventive step beyond prior art. Newly identified combinations, unique formulations, or improved therapeutic effects may support inventive merits.

Claims Validity Concerns

  • Overly broad claims risk invalidity unless sufficiently supported by detailed description and comparative data.
  • Narrow claims may limit market control but are easier to defend and enforce.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Global Patent Considerations

  • Patent Family and International Protection:
    It is critical to assess whether the applicant sought patent protection in key jurisdictions such as the EEA, US, China, or other major markets. Often, Russian patents are strategically complemented by filings elsewhere.

  • Prior Art and Patent Thickets:
    The pharmaceutical sector is characterized by dense patent thickets, especially in chemical and biological compounds. A patent with narrow claims risks being circumvented by designing around the specific protected features.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Patent landscape analysis indicates whether RU2010129460 overlaps with existing patents, affecting commercialization plans. Databases like Espacenet and INPADOC can reveal close patent successors and related applications.

Competitive Patent Holders:

  • Large pharmaceutical firms, especially those specializing in biopharmaceuticals, are active in the Russian market, seeking national and regional patent protection.
  • Local or regional entities focusing on niche therapeutic areas may hold patents that intersect with RU2010129460's scope, potentially creating licensing or litigative conflicts.

Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strength:
    The breadth and depth of claims directly influence enforceability. Broad claims can deter competitors but face invalidation challenges if prior art exists.
  • Enforcement and Litigation:
    Narrow claims improve the success rate of infringement litigation but may allow competitors to craft around the patent.
  • Future Innovation:
    The patent landscape within Russian and global markets indicates whether similar innovations exist, prompting R&D strategies to focus on inventive areas.

Legal Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patent Opposition and Invalidity:
    Competitors can challenge the validity of RU2010129460 based on prior arts or claims that lack inventive step.
  • Licensing and Partnerships:
    Patent scope influences licensing potential, with broader patents commanding higher royalties but posing higher invalidation risk.

Conclusion

Patent RU2010129460's scope hinges on the specificity of its claims, balancing broad protection against the risk of invalidation. Its success in the competitive landscape depends on these claims' novelty and inventive step, positioning within regional and international patent strategies. A comprehensive understanding of the legal and technical nuances informs better strategic decisions for pharmaceutical development, licensing, and commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise drafting of claims determines the patent’s breadth and enforceability in the Russian and global markets.
  • Strong, novel claims with inventive support—and aligned with comprehensive patent landscaping—maximize commercial protection.
  • Ongoing patent landscape monitoring is essential to navigate the complex pharmaceutical patent environment, mitigate infringement risks, and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Broad claims offer significant market leverage but must be balanced against the risk of invalidity; narrow claims provide stronger enforceability within defined parameters.
  • Strategic patent filings beyond Russia are crucial for comprehensive market protection, particularly in jurisdictions with active pharmaceutical patenting.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of patent RU2010129460 affect its enforceability?
A broad scope enhances enforceability across multiple jurisdictions but increases the risk of invalidation if prior art is identified. Narrow claims are easier to defend but provide limited market protection.

Q2: What are common challenges in patenting pharmaceutical inventions in Russia?
Challenges include ensuring compliance with local innovation standards, drafting claims that overcome prior art, and aligning with international patent practices to secure protection abroad.

Q3: How can competitors potentially circumvent RU2010129460?
They may design around the patent claims by altering the chemical structure, formulation, or method in ways that fall outside the protected scope, especially if claims are narrowly drafted.

Q4: Why is patent landscape analysis critical for pharmaceutical companies?
It identifies existing patents and potential freedom-to-operate issues, informing R&D direction, licensing negotiations, and patent filing strategies.

Q5: What strategy should a patent holder pursue post-grant?
Continuously monitor competitors’ filings, consider filing divisional or continuation applications for broader coverage, and enforce patent rights proactively to protect market share.


References

  1. Russian Patent Office (Rospatent). Patent RU2010129460.
  2. Espacenet Patent Database. Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Scope.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for Examination of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Inventions.
  5. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Development and Patent Strategies.

This analysis equips pharmaceutical professionals, patent attorneys, and strategic decision-makers with a comprehensive understanding of RU2010129460’s patent scope, claims, and landscape positioning, facilitating informed business and legal strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.