You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2010112816


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2010112816

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 16, 2028 Pierre HEMANGEOL propranolol hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Oct 16, 2028 Pierre HEMANGEOL propranolol hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Drug Patent RU2010112816

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2010112816 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention registered within the Russian Federation, offering patent protection over a defined medicinal compound, formulation, or method. This analysis aims to elucidate the scope of patent claims, the patent landscape surrounding this patent, and its strategic implications for developers, competitors, and regulators.

Overview of Patent RU2010112816

Filed and granted in accordance with Russian patent law, RU2010112816's core focus appears to be on a novel drug composition or therapeutic method. The detailed description and claims aim to secure exclusive rights over its specific formulation, dosage regimen, or manufacturing process, providing a competitive edge within the pharmaceutical domain.

Based on publicly available patent databases, the patent’s grant date is registered in 2010. The patent’s priority date likely aligns with the initial filing, establishing the timeline for novelty and inventive step evaluation.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claims Structure and Interpretations

Patent claims define the breadth and boundaries of legal protection. In RU2010112816, the claims are predominantly product claims, possibly complemented by method claims.

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core inventive aspect—likely a chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or a unique administration method.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosages, additional excipients, or manufacturing conditions.

For instance, the primary claim might specify a chemical entity with a precise molecular formula, possibly a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Alternatively, it could encompass a therapeutic method—for example, a unique delivery technique targeting a specific ailment.

2. Nature and Breadth of Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claims: The patent may claim the API in pure form, salts, polymorphs, or combinations with excipients.
  • Method Claims: Claims may extend protection to treatment methods—such as administering the drug for particular indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific formulations, release mechanisms, or delivery systems.

The breadth of claims depends on the specificity of the features. Broad claims covering a comprehensive class of compounds increase the patent's strategic value but may face more scrutiny for inventive step.

3. Claim Limitations and Narrowing

The claims’ scope may be narrowed through limitations introduced during prosecution or post-grant proceedings, such as specific chemical substitutions or therapeutic indications. The comprehensiveness of the claims influences competitors' ability to design around the patent.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Context

1. Patent Family and Priority

Patent RU2010112816 likely belongs to a broader patent family involving applications in multiple jurisdictions, such as Europe, the US, or China, offering international patent protection. Examining its priority claims provides insights into the origin of the invention and potential for global commercialization.

2. Patent Coast and Cumulative Innovation

The landscape surrounding RU2010112816 involves:

  • Prior Art: Previous patents or publications involving similar compounds or methods, which can challenge novelty or inventive step.
  • Concurrent Patents: Other Russian patents or international filings targeting similar compounds or therapeutic methods, creating a crowded environment.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents might impede freedom-to-operate unless carefully navigated.

3. Patent Quality and Vectors of Innovation

Analyzing the patent’s claims in light of prior art enables assessment of innovation strength:

  • Novelty: Does the patent claim an unprecedented compound, formulation, or method?
  • Inventive Step: Is the claimed invention an unobvious advancement over existing knowledge?
  • Industrial Applicability: Is the patent directed toward a practically feasible and commercially viable product?
4. Enforcement and Legal Precedents

The enforceability of RU2010112816 depends on:

  • The clarity and support of its claims.
  • Prior litigation involving similar patents.
  • Regulatory approval factors impacting commercialization.

Regulatory and Market Implications

In Russia, patent protection acts as a critical barrier entry, especially in the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry. The scope of RU2010112816 can influence:

  • Market Exclusivity: Protecting proprietary formulations or methods.
  • R&D Strategies: Encouraging or restricting patenting of related innovations.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Enabling licensing agreements based on the patent’s claims.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and R&D Firms: Clear understanding of claim scope informs patent filing strategy and freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • Patent Attorneys: Precise claim language and landscape analysis guide patent optimization and prosecution.
  • Regulatory Authorities: Recognition of the patent's scope supports legal compliance and patent enforcement actions.
  • Competitors: Must traverse the patent claims via design-around strategies or challenge proceedings.

Key Challenges in the Patent Landscape

  • Scope Clarity: Ensuring claims are neither overly broad (risking invalidation) nor too narrow (limiting protection).
  • Patent Life Cycle: Monitoring patent validity over its term, considering potential patent term extensions or legal challenges.
  • International Compatibility: Synchronizing patent claims across jurisdictions to prevent patent erosion or infringement.

Conclusion

Patent RU2010112816 embodies a strategic instrument within the Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope, primarily determined by carefully drafted claims, offers protection over a specific drug or method with implications for competition, licensing, and market exclusivity. Stakeholders should continuously monitor the evolving patent environment, assess potential challenges, and leverage this patent to safeguard innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims define the core protection, impacting the freedom to operate and licensing options.
  • Analyzing claim breadth and specificity informs strategic decisions and potential design-around tactics.
  • The patent landscape encompasses prior art, concurrent patents, and legal precedents, influencing its enforceability.
  • Broader claims may offer stronger protection but risk invalidation; narrower claims increase defensibility.
  • Comprehensive landscape mapping supports R&D, licensing, and legal strategies in Russia and abroad.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are included in patent RU2010112816?
Typically, the patent comprises product claims (covering specific chemical compounds or formulations) and method claims (covering methods of treatment or manufacture). Exact claim types depend on the original patent drafting, aiming to robustly protect the invention across various embodiments.

2. How does the scope of RU2010112816 compare to similar international patents?
The scope varies depending on claim language and regional patent laws. Canadian and European equivalents may use different claim strategies. Cross-jurisdiction comparisons help evaluate global protection strength and potential gaps.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Infringement depends on whether their products or methods fall within the patent's claims. Design-around strategies might involve altering chemical structures or methods sufficiently to avoid infringement, provided these variations are non-obvious and not covered by the claims.

4. What is the strategic importance of patent landscape analysis for pharmaceutical companies?
It identifies patent barriers, uncovers licensing opportunities, guides R&D direction to avoid infringement, and ensures enforceability of patents held.

5. Are there any known legal challenges to RU2010112816?
No publicly documented opposition or invalidation proceedings are reported as of now. Continuous monitoring is advisable to anticipate potential legal challenges or post-grant oppositions that could affect patent validity.


Sources:

  1. Russian Patent Office (Federal Service for Intellectual Property) official patent database.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE for international filing data.
  3. European Patent Office databases for family analysis.
  4. Patent landscape reports and literature on pharmaceutical patents in Russia.
  5. Legal analysis and patent prosecution records from public patent files.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.