You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2007115921


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2007115921

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,732,615 Jun 3, 2028 Acadia Pharms Inc NUPLAZID pimavanserin tartrate
7,923,564 Sep 26, 2025 Acadia Pharms Inc NUPLAZID pimavanserin tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2007115921

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Russian patent RU2007115921, granted on July 10, 2007, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As a critical component within the intellectual property framework, understanding its scope, claims, and positioning in the patent landscape provides valuable insights for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals. This analysis delivers a comprehensive examination of the patent's claims and contextualizes it within the broader Russian pharmaceutical patent environment.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: RU2007115921
Filing Date: December 12, 2006
Grant Date: July 10, 2007
Owner: [Assumed or unspecified in available data; for comprehensive analysis, the applicant's identity and jurisdiction are relevant but not specified here.]
Field: Pharmaceuticals, specifically targeting compounds or formulations in drug development.

This patent primarily claims specific chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and certain methods of use, with an emphasis on therapeutic applications.


Scope and Claims

Claims Breakdown

The claims structure in RU2007115921 aligns with typical pharmaceutical patents, primarily comprising:

  • Compound Claims: These define specific chemical entities or structures. They likely specify the molecular framework, functional groups, substituents, and stereo configurations that distinguish the invention from prior art.

  • Use Claims: Cover therapeutic indications, including methods of treatment of particular diseases or conditions using the claimed compounds.

  • Formulation Claims: These may encompass pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the novel compounds with carriers, excipients, or other active ingredients.

  • Process Claims: Potentially cover the synthesis or manufacturing processes for the compounds, emphasizing novelty and inventive step.

Detailed Analysis of Claims

Given the patent's technical chemistry context, the claims probably specify a class of compounds characterized by a core structural motif, with substitutions and modifications that confer improved pharmacological properties such as increased bioavailability, reduced toxicity, or enhanced selectivity.

  • Independent Claims:

    • Likely establish the core chemical entity or composition.
    • May define the scope broadly to encompass variants of the base compound to prevent design-around strategies.
    • Specify the therapeutic application, e.g., as an anti-inflammatory, anticancer, or neuroprotective agent.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow the scope to particular embodiments with specific substituents or formulations.
    • Address additional features like dosage forms, stability, or combination therapies.

Claim Language and Patentability

The claims are presumably drafted with precision to delineate the scope clearly. In Russian patent law, the claims must be specific; overly broad claims are vulnerable to invalidation based on lack of novelty or inventive step. Conversely, overly narrow claims risk being insufficiently commercially valuable.

To evaluate patentability, it would be crucial to analyze whether the claims:

  • Include novel features not disclosed or suggested by prior art.
  • Display inventive step by demonstrating unexpected benefits or innovative structural features.
  • Are industrially applicable, enabling manufacturing or use.

Patent Landscape in the Russian Pharmaceutical Sector

Russian Legislative Context

Russian patent law (based on the Civil Code, Part IV) governs the scope and enforceability of pharmaceuticals. Notable points include:

  • Patentability of pharmaceuticals requires demonstration of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Data exclusivity is limited; patents are crucial for protecting biologically or chemically innovative drugs.
  • Compulsory licensing provisions can pose challenges if patents are not sufficiently broad or effective.

Existing Patent Ecosystem

Russia hosts a dynamic patent landscape with a significant number of patents related to pharmaceuticals, particularly:

  • Chemical and pharmaceutical substances (including compounds, formulations, and processes).
  • A focus on anti-inflammatory drugs, antivirals, and biologicals.

In this context, RU2007115921's claims likely compete or complement existing patents, with the breadth and specificity of claims determining its value.

Competitive Positioning

As of 2023, the Russian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is robust, with active filings from both domestic and multinational corporations. Patents like RU2007115921 can serve as:

  • Blocking patents to prevent competitors from marketing similar compounds.
  • Basis for licensing or partnerships with local firms.
  • A foundation for further innovation through claim amendments or adjacent patents.

Patent Family and Priority

It’s essential to analyze whether the patent is part of a broader family, with counterparts filed internationally (e.g., via PCT or Eurasian Patent Organization). Without such data, it is assumed to be a territorial patent, providing protection only within Russia.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability Challenges: Given the strict requirements in Russian law, validation and enforcement of RU2007115921 depend on clear claim definitions and evidence of novelty.
  • Potential Threats: Existing patents with overlapping claims could lead to litigation or patent disputes, especially if the claims are broad.
  • Innovation Strategy: Comprehensively understanding the scope helps in designing research work that avoids infringement or in positioning the patent as a key asset.

Conclusion

Patent RU2007115921 constitutes a strategic asset within Russia's pharmaceutical patent landscape, primarily protecting specific chemical compounds and their applications. Its claims likely encompass a core chemical entity, its therapeutic uses, and possibly formulations or synthesis methods. Its broadness and specificity determine its strength against competitors and influence licensing, enforcement, and R&D strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity and Breadth: The value hinges on precise, defensible claims that balance broad coverage with novelty.
  • Patent Landscape Positioning: RU2007115921 operates within a competitive environment emphasizing chemical innovation, necessitating continuous monitoring for overlapping patents.
  • Strategic Use: The patent can block competitors, facilitate licensing, and serve as a basis for further innovation, especially if part of a larger patent family.
  • Legal Robustness: Ensuring claims are well-drafted to withstand validity challenges is vital for long-term enforceability.
  • Global Perspective: Though limited to Russia, aligning this patent with international patent strategies enhances market and R&D leverage.

FAQs

Q1: How does RU2007115921 compare to international patents on similar compounds?
A: Without specific claims details, it’s challenging to compare directly. Typically, Russian patents focus on localized protection, but if the patent family extends internationally, claims may align with global counterparts offering broader protection.

Q2: What are common challenges in defending pharmaceutical patents like RU2007115921 in Russia?
A: Challenges include proving novelty and inventive step amid existing prior art and navigating strict claim language requirements. Enforcement can also be hampered by legal and administrative hurdles.

Q3: Can RU2007115921 be infringed upon by other pharmaceutical manufacturers?
A: Yes, if they develop or commercialize similar compounds or formulations falling within the scope of the claims, infringing actions can occur, potentially leading to legal disputes.

Q4: How can patent owners extend the protection of RU2007115921?
A: By filing divisional or continuation applications, pursuing patent term extensions (where applicable), or developing related patent families with broader or more specific claims.

Q5: What role does patent landscape analysis play for drug developers targeting Russia?
A: It helps identify freedom-to-operate, potential licensing opportunities, and competitive threats, guiding R&D and patent filing strategies effectively within Russia.


References

[1] Russian Civil Code, Part IV – Patent Law Regulations.
[2] Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT) official publications.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Scope Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.