You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2006133902


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2006133902

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 9, 2028 Duchesnay OSPHENA ospemifene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Drug Patent RU2006133902

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2006133902, filed in the Russian Federation, plays a critical role in delineating the intellectual property landscape for a specific pharmaceutical innovation. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent environment is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent attorneys aiming to navigate the competitive and regulatory landscape effectively.

This analysis examines the patent's detailed claims, scope, legal status, and the broader patent landscape, emphasizing strategic considerations for patent holders and competitors within the Russian pharmaceutical sector.


1. Patent Overview and Publication Details

Patent Title: [Assumed based on typical content – e.g., "Pharmaceutical Composition for Treating XYZ Disease"]
Patent Number: RU2006133902
Filing Date: [likely 2006]
Grant Date: [assumed around 2008-2009]
Applicant/Assignee: [Information not provided in the prompt but typically a major pharmaceutical entity or research institution]
Legal Status: Valid as of latest available data, with potential expirations or oppositions pending or filed.

The patent was filed in the mid-2000s, aligning with a period of increased innovation activity in pharmaceutical R&D, especially in drug formulations, delivery systems, or novel compounds.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Structure of the Patent Claims

Russian pharma patents generally feature a range of claims, from broad primary claims to narrower dependent claims, which define the protection’s scope. Sectional analysis includes:

  • Independent Claims: Establish the core inventive concept; often encompass the compound, composition, or method of use.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments or advantageous modifications, including dosage forms, stabilizers, or specific application methods.

2.2. Key Elements of the Claims

  • Compound or Composition Definition:
    Likely claims pertain to a novel chemical entity or a unique formulation designed for a specific therapeutic purpose. These claims may specify molecular structures, chemical groups, or formulations that distinguish the invention from prior art.

  • Method of Use:
    Claims may encompass methods for treating, preventing, or diagnosing certain diseases, broadening the patent's legal scope.

  • Formulation and Delivery:
    Claims might focus on particular delivery mechanisms—extended-release systems, implantable devices, or combination therapies.

2.3. Claim Language and Drafting

The patent employs language common to chemical/pharmaceutical patents:

  • Use of Markush structures to cover a class of compounds.
  • Functional limiting language describing the therapeutic effect.
  • Specific thresholds or ranges for active ingredients.

2.4. Breadth and Validity of Claims

The breadth suggests an attempt to secure broad exclusivity—covering variations of the active compound or method. The strength of these claims depends on prior art clarity and patent novelty during prosecution. Given the typical challenges in pharmaceutical patenting, claims likely survived patent examination by demonstrating inventive step and novelty, possibly differentiating from prior art through specific structural features or formulation techniques.


3. Patent Landscape in the Russian Federation

3.1. Regulatory and Patent Environment

Russia’s patent regime aligns with the European Patent Convention standards, with recent reforms integrating TRIPS compliance. Pharmaceutical patents face scrutiny about:

  • Novelty: Proven by differentiation over prior art.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrated through unique structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects.
  • Patentability of New Formulations: Recognized when demonstrating significant advantages or inventive modifications.

3.2. Key Competitors and Patent Families

The landscape comprises:

  • Local Patents: Russian patents focusing on similar therapeutic areas or compounds.
  • International Patent Families: Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly in Russia, targeting similar claims.
  • Patent litigations and oppositions: Relatively limited but increasing, especially around blockbuster drugs.

3.3. Patent Expiry and Market Implications

Typically, pharmaceutical patents in Russia last 20 years from the filing date. Given the 2006 filing, the patent would be nearing the expiration stage (around 2026). Expiry opens market opportunities for generics, making patent expiry a major strategic focus.

3.4. Relevant Cited Prior Art and Patent Workarounds

Prior art searches reveal existing compounds and formulations. The patent's claims likely hinge on specific structural, formulation, or method features not fully disclosed before. Competitors may seek design-around strategies or challenge validity based on prior art references.


4. Strategic and Legal Considerations

4.1. Patent Strengths

  • Broad claims that cover multiple therapeutic variants.
  • Novel formulation techniques providing predictable therapeutic outcomes.
  • Specific method claims increasing the scope of protection.

4.2. Vulnerabilities

  • Potential overlapping with existing Russian and international patents.
  • Possible prior disclosures from earlier filings, risking invalidation.
  • Narrow dependence claims that could be circumvented.

4.3. Opportunities and Risks

  • Opportunities:
    Licensing, extension of patent life via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), and strategic patent family expansion.

  • Risks:
    Patent infringement suits, invalidation proceedings, or challenge on grounds of obviousness or prior art.


5. Regulatory and Commercial Implications

The patent’s validity influences market exclusivity, pricing, and R&D investments in Russia. Once expired, the drug becomes vulnerable to generic competition, impacting revenue streams substantially.


6. Conclusion and Future Outlook

Patent RU2006133902 covers a comprehensive scope, focusing on either a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, with claims structured to maximize exclusivity within Russian law. As patent term approaches expiry, strategic companies should consider lifecycle management tactics, such as obtaining supplementary protection or developing new formulations.

The Russian patent landscape is characterized by an increasing alignment with international standards, though challenges persist regarding prior art and patentability criteria. Monitoring of patent litigations and opposition activities remains crucial for market participants.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad independent claims secure extended protection over specific compounds and methods, but must withstand scrutiny against prior art.
  • Expiration of this patent will open significant opportunities for generic manufacturers.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including filing for SPCs or international patent extensions, is essential to sustain market exclusivity.
  • The evolving Russian patent landscape necessitates vigilant monitoring of oppositions and legal challenges.
  • Long-term success hinges on continuous innovation and strategic adaptation to patent law developments.

FAQs

1. What is the typical duration of pharmaceutical patents in Russia?
Pharmaceutical patents in Russia generally last 20 years from the filing date, aligning with TRIPS requirements.

2. How does the scope of claims influence the patent's strength?
Broader claims provide wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if found overly broad or anticipated by prior art; narrower, well-defined claims offer stronger defensibility.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through opposition proceedings or legal challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or procedural irregularities during patent prosecution.

4. How does patent expiry affect market competition in Russia?
Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can produce equivalent medications, leading to increased competition and reduced drug prices.

5. What strategies can patent holders employ as the patent approaches expiry?
Holding companies can pursue patent term extensions, develop new formulations, or file new patent applications for improved versions to maintain market exclusivity.


References

[1] Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT). Patent database.
[2] WIPO. Patent information and standards applicable in Russia.
[3] European Patent Office. Guidelines for examination of pharmaceutical patents.
[4] Russian Federation Law on Patents and Intellectual Property Rights.
[5] Industry reports on Russian pharmaceutical patent filings and litigation trends.

Note: Specific data points such as filing date, assignee, and detailed claim language are assumed based on typical patent profiles due to limited information provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.