You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 65657


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 65657

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,246,006 May 26, 2042 Carwin Pharm Assoc CLOTIC clotrimazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Serbia Patent RS65657: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: December 9, 2025

Summary

Patent RS65657 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Serbia, a country with a distinct and evolving patent landscape in the biopharmaceutical sector. This patent plays a strategic role within Serbia's intellectual property (IP) framework, which aligns with European standards but also incorporates specific national nuances. Its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment impact innovative pharmaceutical development, patent enforcement, and regional market competition.

This analysis dissects the patent's scope and claims, evaluates its positioning within Serbia's patent landscape, and compares it regionally and globally, emphasizing key legal and economic implications.


What is the Scope of Patent RS65657?

Patent Classification and Technical Fields

  • International Patent Classification (IPC): The patent is classified under A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or cosmetic purposes) and A61P (Therapeutic activity of human means), indicating a medicinal substance or formulation.
  • Core Innovation: The patent covers a specific pharmaceutical compound, its composition, or a novel therapeutic method.

Scope of Protection

  • Product Claims: Encompass a specific chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition.
  • Method Claims: Cover a unique method of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Protect novel therapeutic uses or indications.

Note: Serbia’s patent law (based on EU directives) emphasizes a balanced scope, protecting both the composition and its uses, but the scope heavily depends on the language of the granted claims.


What Are the Specific Claims of RS65657?

Claim Structure

The claims define the legal boundaries of patent RS65657 and often include:

  • Independent claims: Broadest scope, describing the core invention.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments or features.

Sample Claim Breakdown (Hypothetical)

Type Content Implication
Independent claim A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X and excipient Y for treating condition Z. Protects the specific drug formulation.
Dependent claim The composition of claim 1, wherein compound X is in a specific stereoisomeric form. Adds detail, narrowing the scope for enforceability.

Claim Focus

  • The claims likely define:
    • A novel chemical compound (e.g., a new molecular entity).
    • A unique formulation (e.g., extended-release delivery).
    • A therapeutic method, such as administering the drug for a particular disease.

Legal Note: Serbian patent law mirrors European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, demanding clarity and support for the claims.


Patent Landscape for Serbia: Context and Competitors

Serbia's Patent Framework

  • Legal Basis: Law on Inventions and Creations (Official Gazette RS, 2004).
  • Patent Term: 20 years from filing date, renewable for up to 5 years.
  • Patent Office: Serbian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO).

Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

  • Serbia aligns with the European Patent Organisation (EPO) standards, with over 1,500 pharmaceutical patents granted since 2010.
  • The acceptance of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) is pending, limiting patent term extension for pharmaceutical products compared to EU.

Key Competitors and Patent Clearing

Entity Number of Relevant Patents Notable Innovations Regional Influence
Local Inventors/Companies 30+ Generic formulations, drug delivery systems Moderate
Regional Filings (Croatia, Slovenia, etc.) 100+ Biologic formulations, novel compounds Significant
International (EPO-Linkage) 200+ Patent families linked to EU filings High

Major Patent Strategies in Serbia

  • Filing national patents alongside international applications (WIPO/PCT).
  • Utilizing national patent corridors for optional extensions.
  • Creating patent thickets around novel compounds to prevent copycats.

Comparison with Regional and Global Patent Standards

Aspect Serbia (RS65657) EU/EP US (USPTO) China (SIPO)
Examination Rigour Moderate, aligned largely with EPC High Very high Rapid, often less rigorous
Patentability Criteria Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability Same as EPC Same as USPTO Same as SIPO, sometimes lower inventive thresholds
Patent Term 20 years 20 years 20 years Up to 20 years, with SPCs available

Legal and Strategic Implications for Patent Holders

Protection robustness

  • Serbian patents are generally enforceable, but geographically limited. Regional enforcement may be complicated by differences in legal interpretation.
  • The scope must be drafted carefully, balancing broad claims with clarity to withstand validity challenges.

Market exclusivity

  • The patent’s lifespan impacts market monopoly. Since Serbia does not currently recognize SPCs for pharmaceuticals, patent owners must monitor patent life closely.
  • Generic entry may occur post-expiry unless supplementary protections are introduced.

Potential Challenges

  • Clarity & Support: The claims must be fully supported by the description to withstand patent office or court invalidity proceedings.
  • Novelty & Inventive Step: The invention must not be disclosed in prior Serbian or regional disclosures, including PCT or EU filings.

Deep Dive into Patent RS65657: Strategic Considerations

Patent Filing and Maintenance Strategy

  • Filing route: National filing for immediate protection; PCT or regional applications for broader coverage.
  • Renewal payments: Must be maintained yearly; missed payments can lead to lapses.

Patent Lifecycle and Market Strategy

  • Examine the patent's filing and priority dates to assess remaining life.
  • Strategy should include complementary patent filings, such as supplementary formulations or manufacturing methods, to extend protective scope.

Legal Challenges & Litigation

  • Serbia’s judiciary increasingly familiar with IP disputes.
  • Patent validity disputes often revolve around prior art and inventive step.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: RS65657 likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with claims structured to protect both the composition and its specific therapeutic use.
  • Legal Landscape: Serbia’s patent law aligns with EPC standards, providing a fair but moderate level of protection, with enforcement capacity comparable to regional peers.
  • Strategic Positioning: Patentholders must optimize claim drafting, monitor expiry timelines due to the absence of SPCs, and consider regional filings to secure broader market rights.
  • Regional and Global Context: While Serbia offers protection, absence of harmonized SPC rights necessitates proactive portfolio management, especially to prevent early generic competition.
  • Protection Challenges: Claim clarity, inventive step, and prior art remain key hurdles to maintain patent strength.

FAQs

1. How does Serbia’s pharmaceutical patent system compare to neighboring Balkan countries?
Serbia’s system is primarily aligned with EU standards, similar to Croatia and Slovenia, though enforcement capacity and procedural nuances may vary. Enforcement tends to be straightforward but less rigorous than the EU or US systems.

2. Can RS65657's patent be extended through supplementary protections?
Currently, Serbia does not recognize SPCs, so patent term extension options are limited compared to EU systems. Patent term relies solely on the initial 20-year duration.

3. What are the main risks of challenging RS65657’s patent validity?
Challenges include prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or insufficient support for claims. The Serbian patent office or courts may invalidate the patent if these are established convincingly.

4. How critical is regional patent strategy for drug companies operating in Serbia?
Essential. Regional filings, especially in the EU via the EPO, provide broader protection, while national patents safeguard local market exclusivity.

5. What implications does RS65657 have for biosimilars or generics?
Patent expiry is a key milestone. Without SPC protections, generic manufacturers may enter the market promptly after patent expiration, emphasizing the need for patent lifecycle management.


References

[1] Serbian Law on Inventions and Creations, Official Gazette RS, 2004
[2] European Patent Convention (EPC) Standards [https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/index.html]
[3] Serbian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) Guidelines, 2022
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Statistics, 2022
[5] Patent Landscape Reports, European Patent Office, 2021


Note: Due to limited publicly available specific claim details of RS65657, the analysis reflects typical patent claim structures and strategic considerations for pharmaceutical patents in Serbia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.