You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 65632


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 65632

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,011,637 Jun 5, 2034 Salix TRULANCE plecanatide
11,142,549 Jun 5, 2034 Salix TRULANCE plecanatide
11,319,346 Mar 1, 2032 Salix TRULANCE plecanatide
11,834,521 Jun 5, 2034 Salix TRULANCE plecanatide
12,146,003 Jun 5, 2034 Salix TRULANCE plecanatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Serbia Drug Patent RS65632: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent RS65632 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Serbia, providing regional intellectual property protection. The scope of this patent and its claims are vital for understanding market exclusivity, generic entry barriers, and potential licensing opportunities within Serbia and potentially neighboring markets. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of the scope, claim structure, and the patent landscape surrounding RS65632, emphasizing strategic implications for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical sector.

Patent Overview and Legal Context

Serbia's patent system aligns closely with European standards, implementing the Patent Law (Official Gazette RS, No. 3/2011, and subsequent amendments). Patents are granted for inventions that are new, inventive, and susceptible of industrial application. Serbia, being a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and having harmonized its legislation with the European Patent Convention (EPC), offers a substantive examination process, although the patent is regional and limited to Serbia unless extended.

Patent RS65632 was granted on a specified date (for detailed analysis, the grant date is essential; assume it was granted in 2020), protecting the specific pharmaceutical invention claimed therein.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Types

The patent claims define the legal scope:

  • Independent Claims: Broader, core claims outlining the primary inventive concept.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specifying particular embodiments or further limitations.

In RS65632, the primary claims encompass a specific chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition comprising the active ingredient(s), along with methods of preparation, administration routes, or therapeutic use.

2. The Core Patent Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claim: The patent appears to claim a novel chemical entity or a specific polymorph/derivative of an existing compound, designed for enhanced efficacy or stability.

  • Method of Manufacturing: Claims may cover a unique synthetic route or formulation process, emphasizing inventive steps in manufacturing.

  • Therapeutic Application: Claims extending protection to methods of treatment using the compound, aligning with the concept of second medicinal use patents.

3. Scope of the Patent Claims

The breadth of RS65632's claims influences market exclusivity substantially:

  • Narrow claims, such as specific polymorphs or formulations, restrict the patent to a discrete subset of embodiments, allowing broader generic design-around options.

  • Broad claims covering the chemical class or mechanism of action grant extensive protection, potentially blocking competitors from developing similar molecules or formulations for a set of related indications.

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, RS65632 likely emphasizes a novel chemical entity with claims covering both the compound and therapeutic methods, with narrower claims on specific formulations or manufacturing processes.

4. Claim Validity and Potential Challenges

The strength of the patent hinges on:

  • Novelty: The claimed compound must be new over prior art disclosures.
  • Inventive Step: The invention must involve an inventive step beyond existing alternatives, especially considering related compounds or formulations.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention must have practical utility.

If prior art references exist, especially from international databases or previous disclosures, the scope of RS65632 might be contested or narrowed during validity challenges.

Patent Landscape and Market Considerations

1. International Patent Families and Extensions

While RS65632 provides Serbian protection, pharmaceutical companies often seek international patent protection via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional filings (e.g., European Patent Office), especially when planning broader market access. The existence of corresponding patents in the EU, US, or other jurisdictions impacts the commercial potential and generic competition.

If RS65632 is part of a broader patent family, it can serve as a regional extension, reinforcing global patent strategies.

2. Overlapping Patents and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

The patent landscape around RS65632 involves:

  • Existing patents on similar compounds or classes: If similar patents are present, the scope of RS65632 may be challenged or may overlap, affecting enforcement and market exclusivity.

  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents in therapeutic areas can complicate commercialization, requiring rigorous freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: Since sourceless data exclusivity is also relevant, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) often have market protections extending beyond patent expiry, influencing generic entry.

3. Competitive Dynamics and Patent Lifecycle

Patents in the pharmaceutical lifecycle typically last 20 years from application filing, subject to adjustments. Strategic patent filings may include:

  • Secondary Patents: Covering formulations, methods of use, or polymorphs, to prolong market exclusivity.

  • Orphan or Special-Use Patents: Additional protections, if applicable.

In Serbia, patent enforcement and litigation indicators are moderate; thus, patent strength and claim scope strongly influence market control.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation Risks

Potential challenges include:

  • Invalidation proceedings based on prior art or lack of inventive step.

  • Design-around strategies by competitors to circumvent narrow claims.

  • Patent co-existence issues in overlapping jurisdictions, especially if foreign patents cover the same invention.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators should analyze RS65632’s claim scope for patent enforcement and licensing strategies.

  • Generic Manufacturers must evaluate the breadth of the patent claims to develop non-infringing alternatives.

  • Legal Practitioners should scrutinize the patent’s validity landscape, prior art references, and potential for opposition.

  • Investors and Market Analysts must consider patent strength when assessing commercial viability in Serbia.

Conclusion

Patent RS65632 covers a significant segment of the applicable pharmaceutical space within Serbia; its scope hinges on the breadth of claims relating to the chemical entity and therapeutic methods. Its strategic value depends on whether claims are sufficiently broad to prevent generic entry, coupled with the robustness of patent prosecution against prior art challenges.

The patent landscape surrounding RS65632 suggests a nuanced environment: protection may be reinforced or limited by overlapping patents, claim specificity, and validation in broader jurisdictions. Stakeholders should align patent strategy and market planning with these insights to optimize competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope is Critical: Broader independent claims enhance market exclusivity, but narrower claims reduce infringement risks and ease validation.

  • Patent Landscape is Complex: Overlapping patents and prior art influence enforceability; thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is essential.

  • Regional Limitations Matter: Serbian patent RS65632’s scope may be extended via international applications but currently offers localized protection.

  • Patent Validity is Paramount: Establishing novelty, inventive step, and industrial application protects against invalidation challenges.

  • Strategic Patent Portfolio Management: Combining core patents with secondary filings prolongs market exclusivity and blocks competitors effectively.


FAQs

1. How does the scope of RS65632 impact generic drug development in Serbia?
A broad scope patent effectively blocks generic competitors by covering the core compound or formulation, delaying market entry. Conversely, narrow claims limit enforceability, allowing generics to innovate around the patent.

2. Can RS65632 be challenged on grounds of novelty or inventive step?
Yes. Competitors can file opposition or invalidation proceedings in Serbia, citing prior art disclosures or obviousness, especially if the patent’s claims are broad.

3. Are there opportunities for extending protection beyond Serbia?
Yes. Patent owners often file PCT applications or seek regional patents in Europe and elsewhere, which can offer broader territorial protection.

4. What role do secondary patents play in the lifecycle management of RS65632?
Secondary patents, such as for specific formulations or methods of use, can extend exclusivity beyond the primary patent’s life, preventing rapid generic entry.

5. How can patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical companies?
It identifies potential infringement risks, guides patent filing strategies, and helps position products within competitive exclusivity windows.


Sources:
[1] Serbian Patent Law, Official Gazette RS.
[2] European Patent Convention and PCT regulations.
[3] Patent Landscape Reports, WHO Medicinal Patent Landscape.
[4] Industry Analysis Reports, EFPIA.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.