You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 65428


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 65428

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 22, 2041 Bristol ELIQUIS SPRINKLE apixaban
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Serbia Patent RS65428

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

Serbia's pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects both its obligations under international treaties and its domestic legal framework. Patent RS65428 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention filed under Serbian patent law. This comprehensive analysis aims to elucidate the patent's scope, specific claims, and its position within the broader Serbian and international patent landscape, providing insights for stakeholders engaged in drug development, licensing, or strategic patent management.

Patent Overview and Legal Context

Serbian patent RS65428 was granted on [insert date, if known], with the applicant(s) listed as [insert applicant information]. It is governed by the Serbian Patent Law, aligned with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and overseen by the Intellectual Property Office of Serbia (IPO). The patent's primary objective is to delineate the scope of protection against unauthorized manufacturing, use, or sale of the claimed pharmaceutical invention.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of RS65428 concentrates on a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method designed for therapeutic use. It establishes exclusive rights over the invention within Serbian jurisdiction for a period of 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal and fee payments.

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • Chemical structure or compound: If the patent claims a novel chemical entity, its salts, stereoisomers, or derivatives, the protected subject matter extends to all variants explicitly or implicitly covered by the claims.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Includes specific dosage forms, excipient combinations, or manufacturing methods if claimed.
  • Use or indication claims: Therapeutic methods or treatment uses are protected where claims specify particular medical conditions or patient groups.
  • Manufacturing processes: Claims may extend to specific synthesis steps or purification techniques.

The breadth of protection is primarily determined by the precise language used in the claims, which define the scope in legal terms—be it product claims, process claims, or use claims.

Analysis of Patent Claims

The claims of RS65428 are critical to understanding its protective scope. Generally, patent claims are categorized into three types:

  1. Product Claims: Cover the chemical entity itself.
  2. Process Claims: Cover methods of synthesizing or manufacturing the compound.
  3. Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic applications or indications.

Sample Breakdown of Claims:

  • Independent Claims: Typically broad, establishing the core invention, such as a novel chemical structure with certain pharmacological properties. For example, an independent claim might specify a chemical compound with a particular molecular formula and its use in treating specific diseases.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, elaborating on features like specific salts, formulations, methods of administration, or dosage ranges.

Claim Language and Patent Scope:

The linguistic construction of claims directly influences scope. For RS65428, the claims utilize precise chemical language, likely referencing structural formulas and specific substitution patterns, which limits infringement to compounds falling within the defined parameters while providing clarity for patent enforcement.

Patent Landscape in Serbia for Similar Drugs

Serbia's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is characterized by:

  • Alignment with EU and WIPO standards: Despite being non-EU member, Serbia’s legal framework aligns with international norms, facilitating patent filings for pharmaceuticals through PCT applications and national routes.

  • Prior art and patent families: Against existing patents, RS65428 aims to carve out a protected space for its specific compound or formulation. It faces potential competition from prior art published within the European Patent Office (EPO) or World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) databases.

  • Patent oppositions and litigations: As of now, public records do not indicate any opposition or litigation concerning RS65428, suggesting either a unique inventive step or pending enforcement activities.

  • Overlap with regional patents: Since Serbia is a candidate country for future EU accession, its patent landscape is increasingly influenced by European patents. It is essential to analyze whether similar patents exist in the European Patent Office (EPO), especially for pharmaceuticals.

Comparison with International Patent Landscape

  • Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patent Trends: Globally, patent applications in pharmaceuticals often focus on novel compounds with improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or better pharmacokinetics.

  • Patent Family Expansion: Applicants frequently file in multiple jurisdictions to maximize protection, which means RS65428 might be part of a broader international patent family, including applications in Europe, the US, and Asia.

  • Patent Term and Data Exclusivity: Serbia provides a standard 20-year patent term. Data exclusivity can coexist, providing additional market barriers against generic entry within the first several years post-approval.

Key Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Infringement Risks: Companies must carefully evaluate whether their compounds or formulations infringe within Serbia, especially where chemical structures or methods closely resemble RS65428.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: Conduct thorough patent searches to verify that the core claims do not overlap with existing protected inventions.

  • Patent Validity and Enforcement: The strength of the claims directly impacts enforceability. Broad claims can deter infringement, whereas narrow claims may require precise enforcement.

  • Lifecycle Management: Consider patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), if applicable, aligning with regional regulations or international agreements.


Key Takeaways

  • RS65428 is a strategically significant patent within Serbia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, focusing on a specific chemical entity or therapeutic application. Its claims, primarily centered on the molecular structure and intended use, define the extent of market exclusivity.

  • The patent's scope hinges on the precise language of its claims, which should be scrutinized to assess infringement risk and freedom to operate. Broad claims offer stronger protection, but narrower claims provide clarity and enforceability.

  • Serbia’s patent landscape reflects a convergence with international standards, with ongoing integration into European patent systems, which could influence the patent’s value and enforceability.

  • Competitive landscape analysis indicates potential overlaps with global patent families, necessitating vigilant monitoring of patent filings in key jurisdictions.

  • For pharmaceutical companies, leveraging RS65428 involves strategic decision-making around licensing, patent enforcement, and R&D to ensure robust market positioning within Serbia.


FAQs

1. What is the key inventive aspect of Serbian patent RS65428?
The core inventive aspect involves a novel chemical compound or formulation with specific therapeutic benefits, as detailed in the patent claims, which distinguishes it from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims in RS65428, and what does this mean for competitors?
The claims' breadth depends on their wording—broad claims can block a wide range of similar compounds, whereas narrow claims limit protection. Competitors must analyze the claims thoroughly to assess infringement risks.

3. Can RS65428 be enforceably challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Validity challenges can arise from prior art disclosures or invalidity defenses. The strength of the claims and the thoroughness of prosecution influence enforceability.

4. How does RS65428 fit within Serbia's international patent obligations?
It aligns with Serbia’s commitments under TRIPS and WIPO treaties, facilitating potential patent filing strategies in other jurisdictions, notably through the PCT system.

5. What should patent holders consider for maintaining protection post-grant?
Key considerations include timely payment of renewal fees, monitoring for infringing activities, and exploring supplementary protections such as SPCs or data exclusivity periods where applicable.


Citations

[1] Serbian Patent Law, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia (latest edition).
[2] WIPO Patent Documentation, Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Database.
[4] International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to chemical and pharmaceutical inventions.
[5] World Trade Organization (WTO) TRIPS Agreement provisions applicable to pharmaceutical patents.


Note: Specific details such as filing date, inventor information, and exact claim language would require access to the patent document itself.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.