You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 58312


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 58312

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,300,054 Aug 23, 2031 Alkermes Inc LYBALVI olanzapine; samidorphan l-malate
10,716,785 Aug 23, 2031 Alkermes Inc LYBALVI olanzapine; samidorphan l-malate
11,185,541 Aug 23, 2031 Alkermes Inc LYBALVI olanzapine; samidorphan l-malate
11,241,425 Aug 23, 2031 Alkermes Inc LYBALVI olanzapine; samidorphan l-malate
11,351,166 Aug 23, 2031 Alkermes Inc LYBALVI olanzapine; samidorphan l-malate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Serbia Drug Patent RS58312

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

The Serbian patent RS58312 represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. As Serbia's patent system aligns closely with international standards, analyzing such patents provides insights into innovation trajectories, market exclusivity, and competitive positioning of associated pharmaceuticals. This report offers a comprehensive review of the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding RS58312, equipping industry stakeholders with crucial intelligence for strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview and Context

RS58312 was granted in Serbia, a country that adheres to the Patents Act reflecting European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, fostering a robust environment for pharmaceutical innovation. It fits into the broader legal and patent landscape of Serbia, which is characterized by a growing pharmaceutical sector eager to protect novel medicines and formulations.

The patent's typical lifecycle spans 20 years from the filing, with potential extensions through supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) under European harmonization, although Serbia does not yet have full SPC provisions comparable to the EU. Its patent term, therefore, largely remains static unless specific extensions are granted.


Patent Title and Priority

  • Patent Number: RS58312
  • Filing Date: The detailed filing date sets the foundation for expiry timelines.
  • Priority Data: If the patent claims priority from an earlier international or regional application, it influences the scope of protection and potential licensing strategies.

(Note: Actual filing and priority dates should be verified directly from patent databases such as the Serbian Intellectual Property Office or EPO databases.)


Scope and Claims Analysis

The core strength of RS58312 hinges on the scope and specificity of its claims. In pharmaceutical patents, claims define the boundary of exclusive rights and are categorized as independent (broad) and dependent (more specific).

Type of Claims

  • Composition Claims: Often relate to active ingredient combinations, formulations, or manufacturing processes.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic applications.
  • Formulation Claims: Focus on dosage forms, delivery methods, or stability features.

(Without access to the full patent text, this analysis assumes typical patent structure).


Claims Breakdown

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Usually, these describe the novel molecular entities, their chemical structures, or unique combinations.
    • For RS58312, the primary claim likely centers on a novel pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic formulation, possibly with improved efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Narrower claims build upon independent claims with specific parameters like dosage ranges, auxiliary ingredients, or specific methods of synthesis.

The breadth of the independent claims determines the patent's protective strength. Broad claims covering a new chemical class or mechanism of action tend to offer better market exclusivity but may face challenges during examination for inventive step and novelty.


Key Components of the Patent Claims

  • Novelty: Claims must introduce elements not previously disclosed domestically or internationally.

  • Inventive Step: Claims should involve an inventive improvement over prior art—e.g., enhanced bioavailability or reduced side effects.

  • Industrial Applicability: The claimed invention must be practically applicable in manufacturing or therapy.

Note: Serbia’s examination criteria for pharmaceutical patents align with EPC standards, emphasizing novelty and inventive step. It is likely RS58312 has been scrutinized accordingly.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Regional and Global Context

Serbia's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals mirrors broader European trends:

  • European Patent Family Members: If RS58312 is linked with European or US counterparts, this affects patent enforcement and generic entry strategies.

  • Patent Clusters: The patent landscape probably includes numerous patents covering different therapeutic areas or related compounds, contributing to freedom-to-operate assessments.

Patent Clearance and Litigation

  • Analyzing prior art and existing patents indicates whether RS58312 faces potential infringement risks or enables strategic licensing.

  • Serbian legal environment allows patent enforcement through civil and administrative procedures, with precedents set in pharmaceutical patent disputes.

Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

  • Serbia allows for the standard 20-year term, unless extensions apply, which are rare for pharmaceuticals without supplementary protection certificates.

  • Market entry strategies must account for patent expiry, expected patent life, and any regulatory data exclusivity.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The scope of RS58312’s claims indicates the level of protection achieved; broad claims suggest high market barriers to generic competition.

  • Generics: Clear, narrow claims facilitate generic entry post-expiry but may also face infringement assertions if overlapping with prior art.

  • Investors & Licensees: Understanding the patent landscape helps evaluate licensing opportunities and patent enforcement risks.


Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

  • Regulatory Data Exclusivity: In Serbia, data exclusivity periods (typically 5-10 years for pharmaceuticals) can extend protection beyond patent expiry, influencing market dynamics.

  • Patent Enforcement: Serbia’s legal framework enables patent holders to seek injunctions, damages, and Customs actions against counterfeit or infringing products.

  • International Influence: As Serbia aligns more closely with EU standards, the patent landscape's evolution may mirror EU pharmaceutical patent developments, impacting global strategy.


Conclusion

The Serbian patent RS58312 embodies a strategically significant pharmaceutical protection—its scope and claims likely cover a novel compound or formulation with specific claims tailored to sustain competitive advantage within Serbia and potentially in neighboring markets. Its strength hinges on claim breadth, inventive step, and alignment with international patent trends. The evolving Serbian patent landscape will influence lifecycle management, licensing, and enforcement strategies for the protected invention.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth Is Critical: Broad independent claims enhance exclusivity but require robust novelty and inventive step arguments.
  • Patent Landscape Complexity: RS58312 exists within a dense regional patent environment that influences freedom-to-operate.
  • Regulatory & Patent Synergy: Data exclusivity complements patent protection, delaying generic entry beyond patent expiry.
  • Strategic Positioning: Effective patent enforcement and potential for international filings can optimize commercialization.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Continuous review of patent status, applicable extensions, and regional filings is vital for maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1: Can RS58312 be challenged or invalidated in Serbia?
A: Yes, patent validity can be challenged through nullity procedures based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or inventive activity, adhering to Serbian patent law and procedures.

Q2: Does RS58312 provide protection beyond Serbia?
A: Protection is limited to Serbia unless related patent families or international filings (e.g., via PCT) extend coverage to other jurisdictions.

Q3: What factors influence the patent's enforceability?
A: Clear claim language, non-obviousness, proper patent prosecution, and diligent enforcement actions determine enforceability.

Q4: How does Serbia’s patent law compare with EU standards?
A4: Serbia’s law aligns closely with EPC standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, facilitating regional patent strategies.

Q5: How can companies navigate patent expiry for RS58312?
A: Companies should monitor patent expiry dates, consider patent term extensions where applicable, and develop novel formulations or uses for market differentiation.


References

  1. Serbian Intellectual Property Office. Official Patent Database. https://www.zis.gov.rs
  2. European Patent Office. Patent Data and Landscape Reports.
  3. Patents Act of Serbia (2011). Official Gazette of Serbia.

(Additional specific patent documents, prosecution history, and prior art references would be needed for granular analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.