You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Serbia Patent: 55487


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Serbia Patent: 55487

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,278,974 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
8,754,072 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
9,045,487 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
9,861,638 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Serbia Drug Patent RS55487

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent RS55487 pertains to a medicinal invention granted in Serbia, a country incorporating the European patent framework but governed by national patent law. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and its positioning within the global and regional patent landscape, offering insights into commercialization potential, legal enforceability, and strategic implications for stakeholders.

Patent Overview

Established under Serbia’s patent system, RS55487 was granted on [specific grant date, if available], protecting a pharmaceutical compound/method. The patent’s primary function is to secure exclusive rights for a novel, inventive, and industrially applicable medicinal invention within Serbia, preventing unauthorized manufacturing, usage, and sales.

Given the patent’s scope is delineated through its claims, this analysis concentrates on deciphering these claims, elucidating their breadth, limitations, and strategic implications.

Scope and Claims of RS55487

Claim Structure Analysis

The patent comprises [number] claims, typically segmented into a main independent claim and several dependent claims. The main claim defines the core inventive concept, while dependent claims specify particular variants or embodiments.

  • Independent Claim: Usually describes the compound or method with generic language sufficient to establish novelty.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down to specific derivatives, formulations, dosages, or therapeutic uses, thus extending the scope or providing fallback positions in patent enforcement.

Scope of the Patent

Chemical Composition Claims

If RS55487 protects a specific chemical entity, the claim’s language likely hinges on the molecular structure, stereochemistry, and purity criteria. Such claims are often characterized by:

  • Structural formulae: Explicit depiction of the compound’s molecular structure.
  • Functional groups: Definitions of substituents or specific moieties.
  • Purity and stability parameters: Thresholds for pharmaceutical quality.

The scope here is generally narrower but robust, offering precise enforcement possibilities against close analogs.

Method and Use Claims

RS55487 might encompass method of manufacturing, therapeutic application, or dosage regimen claims. These broaden the patent’s scope, especially if they cover:

  • Treatment of specific indications (e.g., cancer, neurological disorders).
  • Novel administration methods or formulations enhancing bioavailability or patient compliance.

Use claims also provide strategic leverage, preventing similar therapeutics for the same medical indication.

Formulation and Delivery Claims

Additional claims could cover:

  • Specific dosage formats (tablets, injections).
  • Delivery mechanisms (controlled release systems).
  • Co-formulations with synergistic agents.

The detailed language must specify these aspects to ensure enforceability without undue ambiguity.

Limitations and Potential Patent Voidance Risks

Claims must meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria intrinsic to Serbian patent law aligned with European standards. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art is found; overly narrow claims may restrict enforcement or commercialization scope.

Patent Landscape in Serbia

National and Regional Context

Serbia, as an accordant member of the European Patent Convention (EPC), aligns its patent law with European standards, allowing inventors to register patents with national authorities or via the European Patent Office (EPO) with validation in Serbia.

Key points about Serbia's patent landscape include:

  • Local patent law (Law on Patents, 2004) provides the framework, notably Article 18-38 regarding patentability, and 68-72 concerning enforcement.
  • The patent term is 20 years from filing, consistent with EPC standards.
  • The patent examination process ensures novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Regional Patent Strategies

Pharmaceutical patent protection often benefits from regional patent families extending across Europe. For RS55487, patent holders may seek:

  • European Patent validation in Serbia via the EPO, providing broader protection.
  • PCT applications to extend patent rights internationally.

Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs

The landscape features:

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with existing patents mostly filed in major jurisdictions like the US, EU, and China.
  • Patent expirations for many blockbuster drugs open avenues for generic manufacturers.
  • Patent thickets around novel chemical entities, requiring precise claims to avoid infringing on existing patents.

In this context, RS55487’s strategic value depends on its novelty status relative to prior art, including earlier patents, scientific literature, and public disclosures.

Enforcement and Market Impact

Patent enforcement in Serbia follows civil and criminal procedures, with specialized courts handling patent disputes. Market exclusivity relies heavily on the strength of claims and legal safeguards against infringement.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: RS55487’s scope determines its ability to prevent generic competition and to negotiate licensing deals.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must analyze patent claims for freedom-to-operate before development.
  • Regulatory Agencies: Require patent status as part of drug approval processes, influencing market entry.
  • Legal Practitioners: Need to interpret claims precisely to uphold or contest patent validity.

Key Considerations

  1. Claim clarity and breadth directly influence enforceability.
  2. Prior art searches are vital to assess potential invalidation risks.
  3. Patent life (typically 20 years) requires strategic timing for commercialization.
  4. International filing strategies enhance market protection beyond Serbia.
  5. Patent landscapes around the active compound inform about competition and patent thickets.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of RS55487 hinges on the precise language of its claims, balancing breadth and specificity to ensure enforceability.
  • Strategic patent positioning in Serbia must account for regional patent laws, potential for European validation, and existing IP landscapes.
  • Strong claim drafting, combined with comprehensive prior art searches, minimizes invalidation risks and maximizes commercial exclusivity.
  • Stakeholders should monitor patent expiry dates, claim scope, and potential infringement to optimize their market strategies.
  • A coordinated approach leveraging both national and regional patent protections enhances competitive advantages in Serbia and neighboring markets.

FAQs

1. How do the claims of RS55487 compare to international patents on similar compounds?
Claims’ scope varies; Serbia’s patent law emphasizes precise, well-defined claims. Comparison requires detailed claim analysis against international patents, considering territorial and legal differences, to evaluate patent strength and potential for infringement.

2. What strategies can generic manufacturers pursue if RS55487’s claims are narrow?
They can investigate potential workarounds by designing non-infringing formulations or methods, or challenge the patent’s validity based on prior art, invalidating overly broad or unsupported claims.

3. Can RS55487 be enforced in other Balkan countries?
Enforcement depends on national laws; Serbia’s patent protections are not automatically enforceable elsewhere. However, regional strategies include filing in neighboring countries or via regional agreements like the EPC.

4. What is the significance of the patent’s claim dependencies for its legal strength?
Dependent claims reinforce the patent’s scope, providing fallback positions if core claims are challenged, and help delineate variations or specific embodiments.

5. How does Serbia’s participation in international patent treaties impact RS55487’s protection?
Participation facilitates filing via PCT or European routes, broadening protection, and aligns Serbian patent standards with international norms, strengthening enforceability across jurisdictions.


References

  1. Serbian Law on Patents, 2004.
  2. European Patent Convention, 1973.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. EPO’s Guidelines for Examination, 2021.
  5. Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Serbia – Patent Office Publications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.