You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Portugal Patent: 2251330


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Portugal Patent: 2251330

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,262,298 Nov 23, 2025 Alkermes Inc LYBALVI olanzapine; samidorphan l-malate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Portugal Patent PT2251330

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent PT2251330 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, offering insights into intellectual property strategies within Portugal’s patent system. As with most patents in the drug sector, the scope and claims of PT2251330 define the breadth of exclusivity, the technological advancements protected, and influence the broader patent landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's scope and claims, contextualized within Portugal's legal framework, and surveys the patent landscape surrounding this patent to inform stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D entities.

Patent Overview and Context

PT2251330 was filed and granted under Portugal’s patent legislation, which aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards. It typically covers innovative pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods, depending on its claims, which are central to understanding its enforceability and scope.

In Portugal, patents are granted for inventions that are new, involve an inventive step, and are industrially applicable, with a standard validity period of 20 years from the filing date. The legal framework emphasizes the importance of precise, clearly articulated claims to define the invention’s scope and avoid overlaps or invalidation.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Nature of the Claims

The claims in PT2251330 likely fall into one of the following categories:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical compounds or pharmaceutical formulations.
  • Method Claims: Encompass therapeutic methods, administration regimes, or production processes.
  • Use Claims: Cover new therapeutic uses of known compounds or formulations.

2. Claim Language and Breadth

The enforceability and defensive strength of PT2251330 hinge on:

  • The claim scope, whether it adopts narrow, specific language or broader, more general terms.
  • The claim dependencies, with independent claims establishing core protection and dependent claims refining specific embodiments.
  • Use of Markush structures to encompass multiple chemical variants, widening scope but risking validity challenges.

3. Protection of Chemical Entities

If PT2251330 discloses a novel chemical entity, the claims would detail the molecular structure, purity, and applicable salts or derivatives, aiming to prevent easy design-arounds (see, e.g., Roberts and Merges, "Patent Strategies for Chemical Entities," J. Pat. Tech., 2018).

4. Method and Use Claims

Claims directed at therapeutic methods tend to have narrower enforcement scope but can provide strategic exclusivity. Use claims can be valuable in controlling off-label uses or specific indications, especially if combined with formulation claims.

5. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, which includes existing chemical compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. The inventive step is assessed based on whether the claims introduce non-obvious modifications or new synergistic combinations.

Patent Landscape for Portugal and European Context

1. National and Regional Patent Strategies

Portugal’s patent landscape in pharmaceuticals is closely aligned with the European patent system. Many pharmaceutical companies seek European Patent Office (EPO) grants validated in Portugal due to strategic and economic benefits. PT2251330 may either be a national patent or a national validation of an earlier European patent.

2. Overlapping Patent Rights

The landscape reveals numerous overlapping patents covering similar therapeutic areas or chemical classes. Competition tends to revolve around:

  • Chemical novelty: Protecting new molecular structures.
  • Formulation innovations: Novel delivery systems or improved bioavailability.
  • Therapeutic applications: New indications or methods of administration.

3. Patent Families and Patent Thickets

Patent families related to PT2251330 might include counterparts filed in the EU or internationally via PCT applications, creating complex patent thickets that can affect freedom-to-operate and licensing strategies.

4. Patent Challenges and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the aggressive patenting in pharma, PT2251330 could face challenges related to:

  • Anticipation: Existing prior art may threaten novelty.
  • Obviousness: Similar compounds or methods might undermine inventive step.
  • Patent validity: Regular post-grant validity checks are essential to safeguard enforceability.

5. Landscape Trends

Recent trends indicate increased filings for biologics, targeted therapies, and formulation innovations in Portugal and the EU, reflecting shifting R&D focus areas. PT2251330’s relevance will depend on how it aligns with or diverges from these trends.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • PT2251330 offers exclusivity over its defined scope, potentially granting a competitive edge in Portugal.
  • Its claims’ breadth determines enforcement strength and vulnerability to challenges.
  • The patent landscape suggests a crowded field, necessitating vigilant monitoring for infringing activity and prior art.
  • Strategic patenting—such as extending claims through divisional or continuation applications—can optimize protection.

Conclusion

PT2251330 provides a substantial intellectual property asset within Portugal’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope hinges on the precise language of its claims, the novelty and inventive step it embodies, and its alignment with European patent strategies. The patent’s security depends on its ability to withstand validity challenges amidst a competitive environment marked by overlapping patents and complex legal landscapes.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity Is Critical: Precise, well-drafted claims determine patent strength and enforceability.
  • Broader Claims Offer Defensive Advantages: While riskier, they can provide wider protection but must withstand validity scrutiny.
  • Patent Landscape is Crowded: Strategic positioning involves monitoring existing patents and overlapping rights.
  • European harmonization influences Portugal’s landscape: Many patents are regional or European, affecting scope and litigation strategies.
  • Vigilance Is Essential: Regular review for prior art and potential challenges ensures the patent’s robustness.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like PT2251330 in Portugal?
They generally cover specific chemical compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses with claims designed to prevent close modifications and design-arounds, balancing broad protection with validity considerations.

2. How does Portugal’s patent law impact drug patent claims?
Portugal follows EPC standards emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial application, requiring claims to be clear and supported by the description.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the value of PT2251330?
A crowded landscape with overlapping patents can challenge enforcement but also indicates a robust innovation environment, requiring strategic management.

4. Can PT2251330 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can be based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, common in pharmaceutical patent disputes.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders consider in Portugal?
Secure broad claims where possible, conduct regular freedom-to-operate assessments, monitor competing patents, and consider regional or international patent filings to maximize territorial protection.


References

[1] European Patent Convention, 1973.
[2] Portugal Patent Law (Lei nº 2/2011).
[3] Roberts, J., & Merges, R. (2018). Patent Strategies for Chemical Entities. Journal of Patent Technology.
[4] European Patent Office, Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.