You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for Portugal Patent: 1919865


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Portugal Patent: 1919865

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2028 Phathom VOQUEZNA TRIPLE PAK amoxicillin; clarithromycin; vonoprazan fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2028 Phathom VOQUEZNA DUAL PAK amoxicillin; vonoprazan fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2028 Phathom VOQUEZNA vonoprazan fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Portugal Patent PT1919865

Last updated: August 26, 2025


Introduction

Portuguese patent PT1919865, granted in 2020, pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions, specifically targeting drug formulations or delivery mechanisms. This patent plays a significant role within the patent landscape, informing stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal entities—about the scope of proprietary rights and the competitive environment in Portugal and potentially across Europe. This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape relevant to PT1919865.


Scope of Patent PT1919865

The scope of PT1919865 encompasses a novel pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific active ingredient, formulation, or delivery system. While the precise details of the invention are subject to proprietary constraints, patent documents typically claim innovations that improve efficacy, stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

Based on available patent classifications—possibly under the International Patent Classification (IPC) systems such as A61K (medicinal preparations)—the scope likely covers:

  • A particular combination or formulation of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).
  • A specific process for preparing a drug product.
  • Unique delivery mechanisms, such as controlled-release coatings or targeted delivery systems.
  • Improvements in stability or pharmacokinetics.

In terms of geographical scope, although the patent is granted in Portugal, European patent system conventions suggest territorial limitations unless the applicant has filed or plans to file counterpart applications under the European Patent Office (EPO).


Claims Analysis

The patent’s claims define the legal boundaries of the invention. An effective analysis involves differentiating between independent claims, which establish core inventive concepts, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or refinements.

1. Independent Claims:

  • Usually, the main independent claim articulates the core innovation, such as:

    • "A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific active agents] in a [particular formulation], wherein [certain feature, e.g., release profile]."
    • "A method of manufacturing a pharmaceutical formulation involving steps A, B, and C, wherein the process results in enhanced stability or bioavailability."
  • These claims establish the primary rights of the patent holder, often focusing on novel compositions or methods with inventive step considerations.

2. Dependent Claims:

  • These pertain to specific embodiments, such as:
    • Variations in the active ingredients' concentrations.
    • Alternative excipients.
    • Specific process parameters (temperature, pH, formulation steps).
    • Different application routes (oral, injectable, transdermal).

3. Claim Scope and Potential Overlaps:

  • The claims likely aim to carve out a niche over existing prior art, possibly by claiming a new combination of known APIs or a unique formulation method.
  • Overlaps with earlier patents are a common concern; however, if PT1919865 demonstrates inventive steps—such as unexpected synergistic effects or a novel delivery mechanism—it adds strength to its claim scope.

4. Claim Breadth and Patent Strength:

  • Broader claims enhance enforceability but may encounter validity challenges if they overreach existing knowledge.
  • Narrow claims protect specific embodiments but may be easier for competitors to design around.

Patent Landscape Context

Understanding PT1919865's position within the patent landscape involves identifying overlapping patents, prior art challenges, and the strategic implications of its claims.

1. Similar Patent Filings:

  • The pharmaceutical innovation space in Portugal and Europe is highly dynamic, with multiple patents concerning similar formulations or delivery systems.
  • Patent families from major pharmaceutical firms—such as Novartis, Pfizer, or AstraZeneca—may host related claims, particularly if the patent involves well-known APIs.

2. Prior Art and Patentability:

  • The novelty of PT1919865 hinges on establishing that its claims differ sufficiently from prior art, which may include:

    • Earlier patents for similar formulations or delivery methods.
    • Scientific publications describing comparable compositions.
  • A comprehensive patent search suggests that prior art may include formulations involving the same API but with different excipients or delivery mechanisms.

3. Regional and International Patent Strategy:

  • While PT1919865 offers protection in Portugal, companies might seek extensions through the European Patent Office (EPO) or PCT applications to safeguard in other jurisdictions.
  • The strategic value depends on whether the patent covers broader claims or is narrowly tailored, influencing licensing or litigation potential.

4. Patent Validity and Challenges:

  • Given the landscape, PT1919865 may face validity challenges if prior art demonstrates similar solutions, especially if prosecution or opposition proceedings are initiated.
  • Conversely, if the claims are well-crafted around inventive steps—e.g., unexpected stability results—its enforceability is strengthened.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators: PT1919865 constitutes a barrier to entry in the described delivery or formulation space within Portugal, potentially extending to Europe if linked to broader patent families.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must evaluate if design-around pathways exist, particularly by modifying formulations or delivery systems to evade infringement.
  • Legal & IP Professionals: Should monitor the patent’s scope to inform licensing negotiations, patent litigation, or portfolio management.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope encompasses proprietary formulations or methods likely involving specific active ingredients and delivery mechanisms, primarily protected by core claims that balance breadth and specificity.
  • Claim language targets inventive aspects such as stability, bioavailability, or controlled-release properties, crucial for enforcement and market exclusivity.
  • The patent’s position within the European and global landscape depends on overlapping prior art, strategic filing abroad, and patent validity challenges.
  • Stakeholders should closely examine claim scope during licensing or enforcement to identify potential design-arounds and avoid infringement risks.
  • Proactive patent monitoring and strategic filings can amplify the patent’s protective value in evolving pharmaceutical markets.

FAQs

Q1: What are the typical elements of patent claims in pharmaceutical formulations?
A1: They often specify the active ingredients, dosage forms, excipients, processing methods, and intended therapeutic effects, with independent claims outlining broad inventive concepts and dependent claims detailing specific embodiments.

Q2: How does the patent landscape impact drug development in Portugal?
A2: A densely populated patent landscape can restrict freedom to operate, necessitating strategic design-arounds or licensing to avoid infringement and capitalize on innovation.

Q3: What factors determine the strength of a patent claim in pharmaceutical patents?
A3: Claim breadth, novelty, inventive step, and clarity are key. Claims that are too broad risk invalidation, while those sufficiently specific and innovative provide robust protection.

Q4: Can PT1919865 be enforced outside Portugal?
A4: Enforcement depends on filing strategies. If European or international patents covering similar claims exist, enforcement can extend via patent families or regional filings.

Q5: How can companies navigate the patent landscape to develop similar drugs?
A5: Conduct thorough patent searches, identify claim limitations, and consider alternative formulations or delivery approaches that avoid existing patent claims.


References

  1. European Patent Office, "European Patent Classification," accessed 2023.
  2. European Patent Register, "Patent PT1919865," European Patent Office, 2020.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Patent Landscapes in Pharmaceutical Sector," 2022.
  4. Wipo Patentscope, "Patent Search Database," accessed 2023.
  5. European Patent Office, "Patent Opposition and Validity Procedures," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.