You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 3085363


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 3085363

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
RE47826 May 20, 2029 Innocoll Pharms XARACOLL bupivacaine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent PL3085363: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 7, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL3085363, assigned to a pharmaceutical entity operating within Poland's intellectual property framework, pertains to a novel medicinal composition or a therapeutic method. As part of a strategic review, understanding its legal scope, specific claims, and position within the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical developers, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals.


Patent Details and Basic Information

  • Patent Number: PL3085363
  • Jurisdiction: Poland (part of European Patent Convention, EPC, filings may extend to Europe)
  • Filing Date: (Assumed from public records or patent databases)
  • Publication Date: (Likely within 18 months of filing, e.g., 2022 or 2023)
  • Application Status: Pending or granted — specific status to be confirmed via the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) or European Patent Register.

Note: Exact filing and grant details should be verified through the UPRP or Espacenet.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope:
The patent's scope encompasses novel therapeutic compounds, formulations, or methods of use involving specific active ingredients. The scope is primarily dictated by the claims, which define the boundary of patent rights.

Novelty and Inventive Step:
For a patent in the pharmaceutical field, the novelty may involve a previously undisclosed chemical entity, a combination of known compounds with unexpected synergistic effects, or a new medical use of an existing drug class. The inventive step implies that the claimed invention demonstrates an inventive advance over prior art.

Protection Type:

  • Product-by-Name: Specific chemical compounds or compositions.
  • Method Claims: Methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: New therapeutic indications.

Analysis of the Claims

1. Independent Claims:
These establish the core inventive concept and are pivotal for scope analysis. Common structures include:

  • Composition claims describing the active ingredient(s), excipients, and their ratios.
  • Method claims for administering the therapeutic agents to treat specific conditions.
  • Use claims for the indication or new application of known compounds.

2. Dependent Claims:
These specify preferred embodiments, such as particular dose ranges, formulations, or combinations, enhancing patent robustness and commercial scope.

3. Key Claim Elements & Technical Features:

  • Active Compound(s): May involve a new chemical entity, a derivative, or a salt form with improved bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects.
  • Formulation Details: Sustained-release systems, specific delivery vectors, or targeted delivery mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic Use: Treatment of particular diseases (e.g., oncology, neurology, infectious diseases) with claimed compounds.
  • Method of Administration: Oral, injectable, topical, or inhalation routes.

4. Claim Clarity and Support:
The claims must be supported by the description, detailing the chemical synthesis, experimental results, and therapeutic efficacy, complying with EPC requirements [1].


Patent Landscape in Poland and Europe

1. Regional Patent Systems:
Polish patents are examined under the UPRP, which aligns with European standards, and Poland is also a member of the European Patent Organisation. The patent landscape for pharmaceutical innovations is shaped by:

  • Prior Art Documents: Scientific publications, prior patents, and non-patent literature establishing novelty and inventive step.
  • Existing Patents in the Same Class: Overlapping patents could pose infringement or invalidity considerations.

2. Prior Art and Competitor Patents:
A search reveals numerous related patents focusing on the same chemical class or therapeutic area, indicating active R&D interests. Key overlaps may involve common chemical scaffolds or treatment methods for prevalent diseases.

3. Patent Families and Strategic Extensions:
Filing strategies often include extending protection via supplementary European or international patents, such as PCT applications, or regional patents covering broader jurisdictions like the EU.

4. Trends and Patent Filings:
Recent years show increased filings in Poland and Europe related to biologics, personalized medicine, and drug delivery systems, reflecting sector innovations [2].

5. Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
Given the landscape, thorough investigations are necessary before product launch, considering overlapping claims and potential patent thickets, which could limit commercialization or require licensing agreements.


Legal Challenges and Patentability Considerations

  • Novelty: The invention must not have been disclosed publicly before the filing date.
  • Inventive Step: It should involve an inventive advance over existing knowledge—often scrutinized through detailed prior art searches.
  • Industrial Applicability: Demonstrated via experimental data, clinical results, or manufacturing feasibility.
  • Clarity and Support: Claims must clearly define the technical features and be fully supported by the description.

Case Significance: Strategic and Commercial Implications

Patent PL3085363, if granted, could represent a significant barrier to competitors aiming to develop similar therapeutics within Poland and potentially broader EU markets. Its scope may cover critical formulations or methods, granting exclusivity for a limited period (generally 20 years from filing).

For pharmaceutical companies, understanding the patent scope informs R&D direction, licensing strategies, and negotiations. For generic manufacturers, it highlights potential infringement risks and opportunities upon patent expiry.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Structure and Breadth: The depth and breadth of independent claims determine the scope of protection; broad claims confer sturdier protection but face stricter validity scrutiny.
  • Patent Landscape Dynamics: Overlapping patents in similar therapeutic areas necessitate meticulous freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic positioning.
  • Regional and Global Context: While Poland's patent system provides national protection, extensions into Europe and beyond can optimize commercial leverage.
  • Legal Attacks and Defenses: Monitoring prior art and potential patent oppositions is crucial, especially if the patent covers a widely researched chemical class.
  • Lifecycle Management: Supplementary protections, such as Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs), can extend market exclusivity beyond patent expiry.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like PL3085363?
They generally encompass new chemical entities, formulation innovations, or medical use claims, aiming to secure a broad but defensible protection over therapeutic compositions and methods.

2. How does the patent landscape in Poland influence drug development?
Poland's adherence to European standards ensures consistency with EU-wide patent law, but local nuances may affect patentability and strategic planning, especially considering overlapping patents and prior art.

3. Can existing drugs be patented through similar patents?
Yes, if they involve novel active forms, new therapeutic uses, or improved formulations. However, doing so requires demonstrating novelty and inventive step over prior art.

4. How do patent claims in PL3085363 impact generic manufacturers?
Claims that are narrow or specific may allow generics to design around them. Broad claims can delay generic entry and protect markets for longer periods.

5. What are the steps to challenge or invalidate such patents?
Post-grant oppositions, invalidity actions based on prior art, or appeals against patent decisions constitute the legal pathways to contest patent validity.


References

[1] European Patent Convention (EPC) guidelines; EPO Patent Law Primer.
[2] European Patent Office, Patent Statistics 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.