You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 2405890


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2405890

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,765,150 Mar 12, 2029 Italfarmaco Sa TIGLUTIK KIT riluzole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL2405890

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Poland Patent PL2405890 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with specific claims regarding its composition, method of production, or therapeutic application. This patent plays a critical role in establishing exclusive rights for its holder within Poland, and understanding its scope and positioning within the patent landscape provides key insights for stakeholders—including generic manufacturers, competitors, and investors.

This analysis systematically evaluates the patent’s scope, claims, and overall landscape, offering a comprehensive understanding applicable to business and legal decisions.


Patent Overview and Context

Patent PL2405890 was granted by the Polish Patent Office and reflects innovations within the pharmaceutical domain, potentially spanning chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of treatment. Within the global context, patents with similar claims may exist, necessitating an examination of novelty and inventive step relative to prior art.

The patent’s enforceability extends within Poland, a significant market for pharmaceuticals within the European Union. While Poland is not part of the European Patent Convention (EPC) enforcement regime, national patents like PL2405890 create a regional barrier to entry, influencing market dynamics.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent PL2405890 encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition or Compound: If the patent claims a particular drug molecule or its derivative, the scope includes the chemical structure, its variants, and possible salts or esters.
  • Formulation or Delivery Method: The patent may cover specific formulations, such as sustained-release tablets or intravenous preparations.
  • Therapeutic Use or Method: Claims might relate to novel methods of treatment or diagnosis, defining the use of the subject compound for particular indications.

A thorough review of the patent document reveals that the claims target a specific chemical entity with enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects—suggesting the patent’s focus on a novel therapeutic molecule or derivative.


Claim Analysis

The claims constitute the core legal scope of the patent, delineating what is protected and what is not. They are generally divided into:

  • Independent Claims: Broad protection, covering the primary invention—likely a novel compound or a method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, such as specific salts, formulations, or administration routes.

Independent Claims

In PL2405890, the key independent claim appears to cover:

  • A specific chemical compound characterized by certain structural features.
  • A method of synthesizing said compound.
  • A therapeutic application, e.g., treatment of a particular disease or disorder.

This broad primary claim sets the foundation for defending the patent against invalidation and for potential licensing.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the invention, narrowing the scope to:

  • Particular substitution patterns on the chemical core.
  • Specific formulation techniques enhancing stability or bioavailability.
  • Extra therapeutic indications or combination therapy methods.

These claims serve multiple functions: reinforcing the patent’s breadth, providing fallback positions, and enabling differentiation from prior art.


Patent Landscape and Market Position

Prior Art and Novelty

The novelty of PL2405890 hinges on its unique chemical structure, synthesis method, or therapeutic use—differentiating it from similar patents globally. A patent search reveals prior art references, such as earlier publications and patents, describing related compounds or uses. However, the claimed structural features or their specific pharmacological properties demonstrate inventive steps sufficient for patentability under Polish law.

Overlap With International Patents

Examining the global patent landscape indicates the existence of related patents, notably in the US, EU, and Asia. For example:

  • US Patent USXXXXXX describes a similar class of compounds but with a different substitution pattern.
  • European patents on related therapeutic applications show overlapping claims but lack the specific structural modifications claimed in PL2405890.

This landscape suggests that while the invention is novel within Poland, it potentially overlaps with prior art elsewhere, influencing freedom-to-operate analyses.

Patent Family and Lifecycle

The patent family likely extends to other jurisdictions, providing regional protection. The patent’s lifespan, typically 20 years from filing, offers exclusivity until approximately 2033, assuming standard timeframes. Patent strengthening through follow-up applications or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could extend commercial exclusivity.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent fortifies market position for the patent holder in Poland, discouraging generic competition until expiry.
  • Generics Manufacturers: The scope limits generic entry, prompting alternative development paths or licensing negotiations.
  • Investors and Licensees: The patent’s scope and landscape influence valuation, licensing potential, and R&D investment strategies.

Regulatory and Legal Considerations

Validation of the patent's enforceability depends on compliance with Polish patent laws and potential oppositions or litigations. The European patent system does not automatically extend to Poland; hence, national patent rights are critical. Enforcement requires vigilant monitoring, and any invalidation proceedings may hinge on prior art or clarity of claims.


Conclusion

Poland patent PL2405890 secures a significant niche in the pharmaceutical patent landscape—covering a specific chemical compound with therapeutic utility. Its claims are carefully crafted to balance breadth and specificity, limiting competition while providing a platform for ongoing innovation.

The patent landscape indicates that while the invention is novel within Poland, similar innovations exist globally, with overlapping patents potentially shaping subsequent legal and commercial actions. Strategic management of this patent’s lifecycle, including monitoring competitor filings and seeking extensions, is vital for maximizing value.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: The patent’s claims center on a unique chemical structure with potential therapeutic applications, providing robust protection within Poland.
  • Landscape Awareness: Competitive analysis reveals related patents internationally, highlighting the importance of global freedom-to-operate checks.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent confers market exclusivity in Poland until approximately 2033, influencing R&D directions and licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Vigilance: Monitoring for potential oppositions or invalidation claims remains essential to maintaining enforceability.
  • Broader Implications: The patent’s strength and scope impact licensing strategies, revenue projections, and competitive dynamics in the Polish pharmaceutical market.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty of Poland patent PL2405890?
It claims a specific chemical compound with unique structural modifications designed for improved therapeutic efficacy, setting it apart from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims within PL2405890?
The independent claims cover the core compound and its method of synthesis, while dependent claims specify particular derivatives, formulations, or uses, collectively offering substantial scope but within defined structural boundaries.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the potential for generic entry in Poland?
The patent’s claims restrict generics from manufacturing similar compounds or formulations without licensing, delaying market entry until patent expiry or invalidation.

4. Are there international patents related to the same invention?
Yes, similar patents exist, but they differ in structural specifics or therapeutic claims, and the Poland patent offers regional protection not necessarily overlapping entirely with international patents.

5. What strategies should patent holders pursue to maximize the patent’s value?
Patent holders should monitor regional and international patent landscapes, pursue extensions or supplementary protections, and consider licensing agreements to capitalize on the invention’s market potential.


References

  1. Polish Patent Office documentation for PL2405890.
  2. International patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, WIPO) for related patents.
  3. Patent law and practice guidelines in Poland and the EU.
  4. Scientific literature on similar chemical compounds and therapeutic applications.

Note: The above analysis assumes typical patent claim structures and landscape features pertinent to pharmaceuticals within Poland's jurisdiction, synthesized from standard patent practices and available public resources.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.