You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 2300013


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2300013

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,012,462 Apr 28, 2031 Takeda Pharms Usa ALUNBRIG brigatinib
9,273,077 May 21, 2029 Takeda Pharms Usa ALUNBRIG brigatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL2300013

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL2300013 pertains to a potentially significant innovation within the pharmaceutical sector in Poland. To comprehensively evaluate its strategic importance, a detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential. This examination provides clarity on the patent’s novelty, territorial protection, potential overlaps with existing rights, and implications for competitors and stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PL2300013
Filing Date: Likely filed in 2023 (based on numbering conventions, specific date unavailable)
Jurisdiction: Poland (European Patent Office designation within the Polish national phase, if applicable)

This patent appears to relate to a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method, given the sector's proliferation of innovation in drug compositions, delivery systems, and manufacturing processes.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent defines the breadth of protection conferred by the granted patent rights. It is anchored primarily in the claims section, which delineates the technical features deemed novel and inventive by the patent applicant.

Key Elements of the Patent Scope:

  • Claims Construction:
    The claims in PL2300013 likely cover a specific drug compound, a novel pharmaceutical formulation, or an innovative method of manufacturing or administering the drug.

    • If the claims target a chemical entity, they probably specify the structure, including chemical formulae and substituents.
    • If the claims relate to a formulation, they might specify excipient combinations, delivery mechanisms such as controlled-release systems, or stabilization techniques.
    • For process claims, the scope includes specific steps or conditions that distinguish the process from prior art.
  • Claim Types & Breadth:
    Policing claim language (e.g., "comprising," "consisting of," "including") significantly influences scope:

    • Product Claims: Broader, covering the drug in various formulations.
    • Method Claims: Cover specific therapeutic methods or manufacturing processes.
    • Use Claims: Covering new therapeutic uses of known compounds, providing secondary protection.

Likely Scope Highlights:

Given the typical pharmaceutical patent landscape, PL2300013’s scope may be constructed to maximize exclusivity on a novel active ingredient or delivery method, while balancing the need to withstand legal challenge through precise claim language.


Claims Analysis

The specific language and structure of the claims are crucial. While the full claims text is unavailable, standard strategies adopted within pharmaceutical patents guide expected features:

  • Independent Claims:

    • Center around the core invention, for example, a novel chemical compound or a unique process.
    • Cover the minimal inventive concept desired.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Add specific features or embodiments (e.g., specific dosages, formulations, or manufacturing conditions).
    • Enhance patent scope defensibility by providing fallback positions.

Hypothetical Claims Focus:

  • Novel compound claim:
    "A compound with chemical structure X, characterized by substituents Y and Z, exhibiting enhanced bioavailability."

  • Formulation claim:
    "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X and excipient Y, in a specific ratio, for use in treating condition Z."

  • Method of use:
    "A method for treating disease Z involving administering compound X in an amount effective to achieve Y."

The claims probably include multiple dependent claims incrementally narrowing the scope, which helps in defending against invalidation attempts.


Patent Landscape in Poland and Europe

1. National and Regional Patent Context

Poland operates under the European Patent Convention, granting patents that have national validity unless extended via the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in Poland aligns closely with the broader European environment.

2. Key Competitors & Prior Art

  • Extensive prior art exists for common classes of pharmaceuticals, including patents filed in the EPO, WIPO, or other national jurisdictions.

  • Direct competitors often hold patents on similar compounds, formulations, or methods, necessitating careful claim drafting to avoid infringement or to carve out a distinctive niche.

  • Patent Families & Chain:
    Likely, similar patents exist affiliating the invention with broader families targeting related diseases or delivery systems.

3. Patentability & Novelty

  • The patent’s novelty hinges on whether the claimed compound, formulation, or process surpasses the known state-of-the-art.
  • Any sharing of the core structure or method with known patents might result in narrower claims or potential invalidation challenges.

4. Patent Strategies

  • Applicants often aim for broad independent claims complemented by multiple narrow dependent claims.
  • Strategic layering of claims can extend protection against potential legal challenges and serve as leverage during licensing negotiations.

5. Complementary IP Rights & Market Impact

  • Poland's pharmaceutical patent landscape is competitive, with existing patents covering known therapeutics and formulations.
  • This patent could strengthen a company's IP portfolio, aiding in market exclusivity, especially if it covers a first-in-class or a significant improvement.

Legal & Commercial Implications

  • Infringement Risk: Competitors' existing patents in Poland and Europe must be analyzed to avoid infringement.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Firms should conduct comprehensive FTO analyses considering European and international patents related to similar compounds or methods.
  • Patent Validity & Enforcement: The strength of the patent relies on how well the claims withstand validity challenges based on prior art during prosecution and post-grant.

Conclusion & Strategic Insights

The patent PL2300013 appears to secure a valuable niche within Poland's pharmaceutical patent terrain, either protecting a novel compound, formulation, or process. Its scope, rooted in well-drafted claims, aims to provide durable protection against competitors while navigating existing patent barriers. The overall landscape suggests a keen focus on strengthening enforceability and broad protection to maximize market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Thorough Claims Drafting: The strength and breadth of the claims determine the patent’s value. Precise, well-structured claims help defend against invalidation and infringement.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of existing patents is necessary to confirm freedom to operate and identify potential challenges.
  • Strategic Filing: Combining broad claims with narrow, specific embodiments enhances protection and fallback options.
  • Global Considerations: Expanding patent protection beyond Poland into the EPO or international markets can ensure comprehensive coverage for commercial expansion.
  • Legal Readiness: Building strong patent defensibility and maintenance strategies safeguards against legal disputes and preserves market positions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent PL2300013?
While the exact claims are not publicly available, it likely protects a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or manufacturing method that offers therapeutic or delivery advantages.

2. How does this patent fit into the European pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It complements existing protections by adding regional exclusivity in Poland, possibly extending broader European patent rights if filed through the EPO.

3. What are potential challenges to the validity of PL2300013?
Prior art references related to similar compounds, formulations, or processes could challenge its novelty or inventive step, especially if similar patents exist in European or global databases.

4. How can competitors design around this patent?
By developing alternative compounds with different structures, different formulations, or alternative manufacturing methods that do not infringe on the specific claims.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders undertake post-grant?
They should monitor for infringement, consider filing divisional or continuation applications to expand protection, and explore international patent filings for broader market access.


References

  1. European Patent Office, European Patent Register (for comparative analysis and prior art references).
  2. WIPO patent database for international patent family analysis.
  3. Polish Patent Office official publications.
  4. Standard pharmaceutical patent claim drafting and landscape analysis guides.
  5. Relevant legal and patent prosecution case law in Poland and Europe.

(Note: Specific claim language and detailed legal status are not publicly available; this analysis relies on standard practices and typical patent strategies in the pharmaceutical sector.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.