You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Poland Patent: 2247558


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2247558

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,932,557 May 26, 2032 Avid Radiopharms Inc TAUVID flortaucipir f-18
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL2247558

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Poland Patent PL2247558 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention, with implications for drug development, commercialization, and patent strategy within Poland and potentially the European Union. Understanding its scope, claims, and landscape context provides critical insights for stakeholders involved in intellectual property (IP), R&D, licensing, or market entry.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of PL2247558, emphasizing its scope, detailed claims, corresponding patent landscape, and strategic considerations.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PL2247558
Filing Date: Information not specified in the prompt but assumed to be recent, given the context.
Grant Date: Not specified; assumed to be granted based on the patent number format.
Applicant/Assignee: Data not provided; typical sources include the patent document itself.
Jurisdiction: Poland, within the framework of the European Patent Office (EPO) jurisdictional reach.

The patent appears to cover a drug-related invention, likely a novel compound, formulation, process, or use, typical within pharmaceutical patenting.


Scope and Claims of PL2247558

General Principles of Scope

Patent scope defines the extent of legal protection and determines infringement boundaries. For pharmaceutical patents, scope analysis hinges upon:

  • The independent claims, which establish the core inventive concept.
  • The dependent claims, narrowing or specifying embodiments.
  • The patent description, which clarifies the scope through examples, descriptions, and definitions.

Analysis of Claims

Given the absence of the full patent text, a typical structure for pharmaceutical patents provides a framework:

  1. Independent Claims:
    Often claim a compound, composition, method of use, or manufacturing process. These provide the broadest protection.

  2. Dependent Claims:
    Specify particular embodiments, such as specific stereoisomers, dosages, formulations, or methods.

Assuming PL2247558 pertains to a novel therapeutic compound, initial claims may include:

  • A chemical entity with specific structural formula(s).
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the active ingredient.
  • A clinical use of the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • A method of manufacturing or synthesis process.

Potential Claim Language and Scope

Given typical patents in drug technology, the key independence claim might read:

“A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, etc., are defined residues, exhibiting activity against [target disease], characterized by [specific feature].”

Alternatively, in the context of formulations:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of formula I and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for use in treating [indication].”

Or a method claim:

“A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of formula I.”

Patent Claim Focus

  • Chemical Structure: If the claim targets a specific chemical scaffold, scope is broad but may be limited by prior art.
  • Use Claims: Focused on therapeutic application, offering protection for treatment methods.
  • Formulation/Process Claims: Extend protection to specific delivery systems or manufacturing innovations.

Claim Strategy Implications

  • Broad claims establish wide protection but risk patent invalidation due to prior art.
  • Narrow claims improve defensibility but limit exclusivity.
  • Combining composition, use, and process claims is typical for comprehensive protection.

Patent Landscape for Poland in Pharmaceutical Innovation

European and Global Patent Environment

  • Poland is a member of the European Patent Organization, with patents enforceable via the European Patent Convention (EPC).
  • The European Patent Office (EPO) grants patents that can be validated in Poland, ensuring harmonized protection.

Key Patent Families in Oncology, Neurology, and Rare Diseases

  • The European patent landscape has seen significant patenting activity, especially regarding innovative therapeutics, biologics, and personalized medicine.
  • Major players include companies like Novartis, Roche, and BioNTech, alongside numerous smaller biotech firms and academic institutions.

Competitive Patent Strategies

  • Innovators focus on narrow, broad, and use claims to carve out market share.
  • Patent thickets are common in high-value therapeutic areas, complicating freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Licensing and cross-licensing are prevalent strategies to mitigate infringement risks.

Patent Landscaping in Poland

  • Patent documents have been increasingly filed in Poland, indicating the country's growing role in R&D.
  • The patent landscape suggests that patents like PL2247558 may serve as blocking patents or foundational IP for subsequent innovation.

Patent Opposition and Litigation Trends

  • The robust pharmaceutical patent landscape experiences frequent oppositions, especially within the first 9 months of grant.
  • Litigation often involves patent validity challenges based on novelty, inventive step, or inventive concentration.

Strategic and Commercial Implications

For Patent Holders:
Patent PL2247558 can provide a vital barrier against competitors, particularly if the claims cover a novel compound or formulation with demonstrated therapeutic benefits. It supports exclusivity in Poland, and potentially in the EU through supplementary protections like SPCs (Supplementary Protection Certificates).

For Competitors:
Detailed claim analysis is needed to assess freedom-to-operate. Identifying prior art that may challenge the patent’s validity is critical, particularly for broad compound claims susceptible to inventive step obstacles.

Innovation Trends:
An increasing emphasis exists on multi-layered patent portfolios comprising composition, use, and process claims. This enhances market protection and licensing potential.


Concluding Remarks

The scope of Poland patent PL2247558 appears centered around a specific drug or pharmaceutical composition with potential claims covering the active compound, use methods, and formulations. Its strategic value depends on the breadth of these claims and its standing within the evolving European patent landscape.

Given the competitive environment in pharmaceutical innovation, patent validity, and scope interpretation, continuous monitoring and analysis of related patent filings and legal statuses are recommended for stakeholders.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims Precision:
    The effective protection of PL2247558 hinges on the wording of its independent claims, emphasizing chemical structure, application, or manufacturing method. Broad, well-drafted claims maximize market exclusivity.

  • Patent Landscape Dynamics:
    Poland's pharmaceutical patent landscape aligns with broader European trends emphasizing innovation, requiring rigorous prior art searches and strategic claim crafting.

  • Strategic Positioning:
    The patent potentially serves as a core asset in a larger portfolio, offering leverage for licensing, partnerships, or defense against generic competition.

  • Legal and Commercial Vigilance:
    Regular enforcement, opposition monitoring, and assessment of potential infringers are crucial for maintaining patent value.

  • Regulatory and Market Considerations:
    Patents in Poland complement regulatory strategies, informing market exclusivity periods and helping secure investment in R&D.


FAQs

1. What is the strategic significance of drug patent PL2247558 in Poland?
It offers exclusive rights to a specific pharmaceutical invention within Poland, enabling its holder to prevent generic entry and secure market positioning, especially if the claims are broad.

2. How does the scope of claims influence patent enforceability?
Broader claims can extend protection but risk rejection due to prior art, while narrower claims provide stronger validity but limited market coverage.

3. Can a patent like PL2247558 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through opposition procedures or litigation based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure.

4. How does Poland's patent landscape affect international pharmaceutical patent strategies?
Poland is integrated into the European system, so patents granted in Poland can beValidated into wider EU markets, influencing broader patent exploitation strategies.

5. What are the implications of patent family structures for drug development?
Patent families covering different aspects (composition, use, process) create layered protection, complicating circumvention and enhancing market control.


References

[1] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Data and Landscape Reports.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Statistics and Trend Analyses.
[3] Polish Patent Office. Patent Application Guidelines and Legal Frameworks.
[4] Patent literature related to pharmaceutical compounds and uses.
[5] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and litigation trends.

(Note: Specific claim language, filing date, and assignee details are not provided in the prompt. These should be retrieved directly from the Polish patent database for precise analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.