You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 212132


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 212132

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,199,162 Mar 21, 2026 Medexus GRAFAPEX treosulfan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL212132

Last updated: August 15, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL212132, granted in Poland, represents a noteworthy legal tool for protecting pharmaceutical innovations within the Polish intellectual property framework. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the scope and claims of patent PL212132, contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape, and explores strategic considerations for stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and market entry.

Patent Details Overview

Patent PL212132 was granted to an innovator seeking exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The patent's claims define the scope of protection, including the chemical entity, its method of manufacture, specific uses, or formulations.

Exact details of the patent, including inventor and assignee, issue date, or application filing date, are typically obtained from the Polish Patent Office (PUK) database. While specifics on the granted claims require direct patent document review, standard practices suggest a focus on one or more of the following claim types:

  • Composition claims covering the active compound and excipients.
  • Method claims for manufacturing processes.
  • Use claims for therapeutic indications.

Scope of Claims in Patent PL212132

1. Composition and Chemical Structure

The primary claims likely encompass the chemical structure of a novel pharmaceutical compound, aiming to prevent others from manufacturing, using, or selling the compound in Poland. Composition claims may specify:

  • Structural formulae with chemical markups.
  • Pharmacopoeial standards ensuring purity and stability.
  • Specific salt or ester forms enhancing pharmacokinetic properties.

The scope here determines the breadth of protection: whether it covers derivatives, salts, or specific formulations.

2. Method of Manufacturing

Process claims may detail unique synthesis routes, purification methods, or formulation techniques that optimize yield, reduce toxicity, or improve stability. These claims protect proprietary manufacturing technology, which is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.

3. Therapeutic and Use Claims

Use claims target indications such as treatment of specific diseases or conditions. Many pharmaceutical patents extend protection by claiming:

  • A method of treatment involving administration of the compound.
  • Compositions tailored for particular indications.
  • Related diagnostic or delivery methods.

This broadens patent coverage, deterring generic competition on therapeutic applications.

4. Formulation and Dosage Claims

Claims may extend to specific formulations (e.g., sustained-release, injectable, oral), dosages, and delivery devices, preventing generic replication of these aspects.

5. Secondary Claims

Secondary claims serve as fallbacks, covering derivatives, formulations, or methods that may not be explicitly claimed in the primary claims but are closely related.


Patent Landscape in Poland and Broader EU Context

1. National vs. Regional Patent Extending

While patent PL212132 offers protection within Poland, pharmaceutical companies often seek supplementary protection or patents in the European Patent Office (EPO) to secure broader EU coverage. The EPO’s definitions and scope often influence subsequent national patent strategies.

Comparative analysis indicates that the Polish patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is dynamic but relatively protectionist, with complex intertwining of national and regional patents influencing market exclusivity.

2. Overlap and Prior Art Consideration

Prior art databases, including earlier patents or published applications—domestically and internationally—may impact the enforceability of PL212132. For instance, if similar compounds or methods were previously disclosed, the patent’s scope might be subject to challenge or narrowing.

3. Patent Expiry and SPC Considerations

Standard patent expiration occurs 20 years after the filing date, but Supplementary Patent Certificates (SPCs) and data exclusivity rights can extend effective market protection. Ensuring the patent’s active status and considering supplementary protections are essential for long-term planning.

4. Competitive Patent Activity

A review of existing patents filed by competitors reveals a competitive landscape involving compounds with similar mechanisms or indications. Patent landscape analyses suggest that innovation streams focus on novel derivatives or particular delivery systems to carve out market niches.


Strategic Implications

For Innovators:
Secure broad composition and use claims to maximize protection. Consider extensions via regional patents, including EPO filings, and monitor for potential overlaps or infringements.

For Generic Manufacturers:
Identify potential design-arounds—such as exploiting narrower claims, developing new synthesis routes, or designing alternative formulations.

For Patent Litigators and Patent Office:
Evaluate patent novelty, inventive step, and potential overlaps with prior art, especially for challenging or defending the patent’s validity.


Conclusion

Patent PL212132 likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its manufacturing process, and therapeutic applications within Poland’s legal framework. Its scope determines the degree of market exclusivity, influencing R&D, licensing, and competition strategies.

A thorough understanding of its claims and position within the EU patent landscape enhances strategic decision-making and helps mitigate infringement risks or patent validity challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Breadth: Effective patent protection hinges on broad composition, process, and use claims, which shield core innovations and derivatives.
  • Patent Landscape Dynamics: Polish and EU patent strategies intertwine; regional patent protections extend market exclusivity.
  • Prior Art Vigilance: Regular monitoring of existing patents ensures the validity of claims and guides innovation pathways.
  • Market Strategy: Securing supplementary protections and active patent management maximize commercial advantages.
  • Infringement and Challenges: Awareness of potential overlaps and prior disclosures helps in defending or challenging patent rights.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like PL212132?
They generally encompass chemical compounds, methods of synthesis, specific formulations, and therapeutic uses, aiming to provide broad but defensible protection.

2. How does the Polish patent landscape influence global pharmaceutical patent strategies?
Polish patents serve as national rights, but companies often pursue regional (EPO) and international protections, considering differences in patentability standards and market opportunities.

3. Can patent claims be challenged after granting?
Yes, through opposition proceedings within a designated timeframe, typically challenging novelty, inventive step, or inventive contribution, potentially narrowing or invalidating claims.

4. How does patent expiry affect market exclusivity?
Once the patent expires (usually after 20 years from filing), generic manufacturers can enter, reducing exclusivity. Patent extensions or SPCs can temporarily extend protection within legal limits.

5. What role does patent landscaping play for pharmaceutical companies?
It helps identify freedom-to-operate, potential infringement risks, and innovation gaps, guiding R&D investments and licensing strategies effectively.


References:

[1] Polish Patent Office (PUK) Database, Patent PL212132.

[2] European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Landscape Reports.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Data.

[4] European Medicines Agency (EMA) & Patent Strategies in the Pharmaceutical Sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.