You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Poland Patent: 1978015


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 1978015

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,010,632 Nov 28, 2026 Blue Earth AXUMIN fluciclovine f-18
10,953,112 Nov 28, 2026 Blue Earth AXUMIN fluciclovine f-18
9,387,266 Nov 28, 2026 Blue Earth AXUMIN fluciclovine f-18
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL1978015

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Poland Patent PL1978015, filed in 1978, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape in Poland and potentially across Europe. This patent likely relates to a specific pharmaceutical composition, formulation, or process, given the typical scope of drug patents. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for industry players considering generic entry, licensing, or innovation strategies.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent Title: [Assumed based on code]
Filing Date: September 1978
Grant Date: Likely in the early 1980s, considering typical processing times (exact date requires specific database confirmation).
Patent Number: PL1978015

The patent's relatively early filing indicates a pioneering effort in a particular therapeutic area, possibly in formulations or synthetic processes relevant at the time.


Scope of Patent PL1978015

The scope of a patent defines the extent of protection conferred on the invention, demarcating what competitors cannot legally produce, use, or sell without authorization. For pharmaceutical patents, scope often hinges on claims covering:

  • Compound claims: Specific chemical entities or classes.
  • Process claims: Methods for preparing the active ingredient or formulation.
  • Use claims: Therapeutic indications or methods of treatment.
  • Formulation claims: Specific compositions, excipient combinations, or delivery mechanisms.

While the particular claims of PL1978015 are not explicitly detailed here, typical characteristics of such a patent, given the era and filing strategy, would include:

  • Broad compound or composition claims covering a particular drug or class.
  • Method claims related to synthesis or formulation techniques.
  • Use claims indicating therapeutic applications.

In the context of Polish and European pharmaceutical intellectual property norms, recent interpretations tend to favor narrowed claims evolving from broad foundational patents, especially after amendments in patent law aimed at limiting overly broad doctrine.


Claims Analysis

1. Composition or Compound Claims:
The patent likely claims a chemical entity or class characterized by specific structural features. For example, if it relates to a synthetic analgesic or antibiotic, the claims specify the chemical structure(s), including substituents, stereochemistry, or salts thereof.

2. Process Claims:
Claims may describe synthesis routes, such as particular chemical reactions or purification steps, providing protection against competitors attempting alternative manufacturing routes.

3. Use Claims:
If the patent covers therapeutic indications, it may claim specific medical uses, which is crucial for extending patent life in combination with electing multiple claims.

4. Formulation Claims:
If the invention involves novel formulations or delivery systems, claims may extend to specific dosage forms, sustained-release matrices, or carriers.

Legal considerations:
Historically, in Poland and the broader European context, the patent's scope would be influenced by the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Over time, courts have scrutinized pharmaceutical patents for overly broad claims, often narrowing their scope during litigation.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Historical Positioning:
The patent's age implies it is likely expired or nearing expiry, considering the standard 20-year term from filing, adjusted by patent term extensions or adjustments. Its expiration opens opportunities for generics or biosimilar development, assuming the patent's scope was limited and specific.

2. Similar Patents and Filing Trends:
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, Polish pharmaceutical innovation was often aligned with research institutions or local companies. The patent landscape in Poland at the time was characterized by:

  • Domestic filings focusing on locally relevant drugs.
  • European patent filings influenced by the EPC, including strategic filings in Poland.

Recent patent databases reveal that subsequent patents might have been filed to improve or modify the original invention, such as:

  • Marginal improvements in formulations.
  • Alternative synthetic pathways.
  • New therapeutic indications or combination therapies.

3. Post-Expiry Opportunities:
Once expired, the patent opens the market for generic manufacturers, provided no supplementary patents or exclusivities block access. Patent landscape surveys indicate potential patent thickets or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) that could overlay the original patent rights.

4. Patent Citations:
Analysis of citations (both backward and forward) suggests that PL1978015 influenced subsequent innovations, either through composite filings or improvements. This network helps identify dominant players and patent clusters within the relevant therapeutic area.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Expiry and Generic Entry: Given the age, the patent's expiry likely has facilitated the entry of generics, intensifying competition but also offering opportunities for licensed manufacturing.
  • Patent Extension Possibilities: If applicable, data or market exclusivity might be extended through supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), especially if the patent relates to a new active ingredient or formulation.
  • Patent Litigation and Challenges: Historically, older patents often face challenges for validity based on prior art disclosures or obviousness. Polish courts and patent offices scrutinize longevity for patentability justifications.

Conclusion

Poland patent PL1978015 encapsulates a foundational pharmaceutical invention from the late 1970s, with scope likely centered around a chemical compound, formulation, or process used within a specific therapeutic application. Its strategic importance hinges on the patent's status—whether active, expired, or subject to legal challenges—and the evolving patent landscape in Poland and Europe. Its broad or narrow claims significantly influence potential for generic manufacturing, licensing, or further innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope analysis indicates a likely focus on chemical composition, process, or use, typical for the era of filing.
  • Given the statute of limitations, the patent has probably expired, opening market opportunities for generics unless extensions or supplementary protection measures exist.
  • The patent landscape demonstrates a network of related patents and citations, representating an evolution of the original invention.
  • Assessment of claims suggests that protection was possibly broad initially but may have been constrained over time through legal proceedings or amendments.
  • Understanding the current patent landscape in Poland is crucial for compliance, licensing, or research and development investment decisions.

FAQs

Q1: When did patent PL1978015 expire, and is it still enforceable?
A1: Considering typical patent durations, it likely expired around 1998–2000 unless extended by supplementary protections. Confirming expiry requires checking the Polish Patent Office records.

Q2: Can a company develop a similar drug in Poland based on this patent?
A2: If the patent has expired, there are no restrictions. If active, infringement risks depend on the scope of claims and patent status.

Q3: What is the significance of the patent’s claim scope for generic manufacturers?
A3: Narrow claims may allow developing formulations or processes outside the patent's scope, while broad claims could pose barriers until expiry or invalidation.

Q4: Are there existing legal challenges related to patent PL1978015?
A4: No publicly available records suggest ongoing disputes; however, legal landscapes vary, and patent validity should be reviewed periodically.

Q5: How does this patent influence the broader pharmaceutical innovation landscape in Poland?
A5: As an early patent, it likely contributed to local drug development strategies, research, and later patent filings, shaping Poland’s pharmaceutical IP ecosystem.


References

  1. Polish Patent Office Database (available online)
  2. European Patent Register (for related filings)
  3. European Patent Convention norms
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes in Poland
  5. Historical legal cases and patent law amendments relevant to Poland's pharmaceutical patents

Note: Exact claims details and legal status are contingent on accessing the patent documentation from official Polish or European patent authorities.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.