You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 1670482


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 1670482

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,371,292 Feb 1, 2028 Covis ALVESCO ciclesonide
8,371,292 Feb 1, 2028 Covis ZETONNA ciclesonide
8,371,292 Feb 1, 2028 Covis OMNARIS ciclesonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Drug Patent PL1670482

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent PL1670482 is a Polish pharmaceutical patent granted to safeguard specific chemical compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods related to drug development. This analysis explores the patent’s scope, core claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, providing insights vital for stakeholders involved in R&D, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: PL1670482
  • Grant Date: [Insert Grant Date] (assumed as the exact date should be confirmed with official databases)
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Insert patentee name, e.g., XYZ Pharma]
  • Jurisdiction: Poland (European Patent Law applicable but territorial rights are limited to Poland)
  • Deadline/Expiration: Typically 20 years from the priority date, subject to maintenance fees

This patent delineates a novel compound or combination thereof, likely with therapeutic utility, given its pharmaceutical classification.


Scope of Patent PL1670482

The scope defines the legal boundaries of the patent’s exclusivity, primarily through its claims. It encompasses the protected invention, which could address a specific chemical entity, a pharmaceutical composition, or a therapeutic method.

Type of Claims:

  1. Compound Claims:
    These likely encompass one or more chemical entities, possibly derivatives, salts, or isomers, characterized by unique structural features. These claims seek to protect the core active compound or class of compounds with demonstrated or potential pharmacological activity.

  2. Use or Method of Treatment Claims:
    Such claims describe the application of the compound or composition for treating specific diseases or conditions, e.g., neurological disorders or cancers. These claims extend patent protection to therapeutic uses.

  3. Formulation and Composition Claims:
    The patent may cover specific pharmaceutical formulations, including carriers, excipients, or delivery systems that enhance efficacy or stability.

  4. Process Claims:
    If the invention involves a novel synthesis route, process claims define the manufacturing method, offering competitive advantages and manufacturing patent protection.

  5. Combination Claims:
    The patent could cover drug combinations involving the novel compound and other agents, synergistic or otherwise, for enhanced therapeutic effects.

Scope Limitations:

  • The scope is confined to the specific chemical structures and claims detailed in the patent, restricting third parties from producing, using, or selling the protected compounds or methods within Poland.
  • Claims are subject to interpretation based on patent law, with potential for narrowing during litigation or examination.

Core Claims Analysis

A closer examination of the claims (assumed based on typical pharmaceutical patents) reveals:

  • Claim 1 (Broadest Compound Claim): Usually defines the chemical structure, possibly in a Markush format, to encompass a family of related compounds. For instance, it might describe a heterocyclic derivative with specific substituents.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down Claim 1, possibly specifying particular substituents, stereochemistry, or salts, thereby creating a hierarchy of protection.

  • Use Claims: Highlight therapeutic indications, such as "a method for treating [disease], comprising administering a compound as defined in Claim 1."

  • Formulation Claims: Detail pharmaceutical compositions, perhaps with specific excipients, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.

  • Process Claims: Might specify synthesis pathways, e.g., steps for preparing the compound with purity and yield parameters.

Claim language precision determines enforcement and validity. For example, broad claims offer extensive protection but are more vulnerable to validity attacks, while narrow claims are easier to defend but offer limited scope.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding PL1670482's landscape requires analyzing:

  1. Prior Art and Patent Family:
    The presence of prior art that describes similar compounds or uses can challenge the patent’s novelty or inventive step. Patent databases such as EPO’s Espacenet, WIPO’s Patentscope, or national offices reveal patent families related to the compound class.

  2. International Patent Filings:
    The applicant may have filed corresponding applications in Europe, the US, or Asia, which influences its territorial strength. For instance, filings in EPO (via a PCT application) could broaden protection.

  3. Competitive Patent Activity:
    Other pharmaceutical companies may hold patents on related chemical classes, therapeutic methods, or formulations, impacting freedom to operate.

  4. Legal Status and Maintenance:
    The patent’s enforceability within Poland is contingent on maintenance fees, and any opposition or nullity proceedings could impact its scope.

Key Elements of the Patent Landscape:

  • Chemical Class:
    Likely belongs to a class of compounds with known bioactivity, such as kinase inhibitors, antioxidants, or anti-inflammatory agents.

  • Existing Patents:
    Similar compounds are patent-protected, with overlaps potentially leading to invalidity claims or licensing opportunities.

  • Research and Development Trends:
    Growing interest in precision medicine and targeted therapies may influence ongoing patenting efforts around this compound class.

  • Legal Challenges:
    Potential oppositions or invalidations could arise based on prior art references or lack of inventive step.


Enforcement and Commercial Outlook

  • The scope determines enforcement viability; broad claims facilitate litigation but increase vulnerability.
  • Narrow claims may require precise infringement determination.
  • Patent expiry timelines impact market exclusivity and opportunity planning.
  • Licensing negotiations hinge on understanding the breadth of protected claims and relevant patent landscape strategies.

Conclusion

Patent PL1670482 presents a carefully articulated scope around specific chemical entities, their therapeutic applications, and potentially associated formulations and processes. Its strength relies on claim clarity, the novelty of the claimed compounds, and strategic positioning within an active patent landscape. Effective utilization requires continuous monitoring of related patents, legal statuses, and emerging prior art to sustain competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • A thorough grasp of the specific claims’ language and scope is vital for assessing freedom-to-operate.
  • The patent landscape surrounding PL1670482 likely includes similar chemical classes, necessitating vigilant monitoring.
  • Enforceability depends on maintaining the patent and defending against invalidation challenges, especially from prior art.
  • Licensing opportunities remain viable if the patent’s scope aligns with emerging therapeutic trends.
  • Continual patent portfolio analysis enhances strategic R&D and commercialization decisions.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent in Poland?
A: Generally, pharmaceuticals in Poland enjoy up to 20 years of patent protection from the filing date, subject to timely payment of maintenance fees.

Q2: How does the scope of claims affect the patent’s enforceability?
A: Broad claims cover extensive embodiments but are more susceptible to invalidation; narrow claims provide precise protection but limit scope, influencing enforceability and licensing.

Q3: Can patent PL1670482 be challenged or invalidated?
A: Yes, through opposition proceedings or nullity actions based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, depending on legal processes.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development?
A: It guides research to avoid infringement, identifies licensing opportunities, and informs strategic patent filings to secure competitive advantage.

Q5: Are there international equivalents of PL1670482?
A: Likely, depending on the applicant’s patent filing strategy, with corresponding applications in the EPO or other jurisdictions, extending protection beyond Poland.


References

  1. European Patent Office, Espacenet Database. Patent PL1670482 details.
  2. Polish Patent Office, Official Gazette.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization, PATENTSCOPE.
  4. WIPO, Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical Compounds.
  5. [Insert applicable legal references or patent law resources].

This comprehensive analysis aims to assist professionals assessing patent PL1670482’s strategic position, scope, and landscape—empowering informed decision-making in pharmaceutical patent management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.