You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for Philippines Patent: 12019500142


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Philippines Patent: 12019500142

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial May 22, 2034 Botanix Sb SOFDRA sofpironium bromide
⤷  Start Trial May 22, 2034 Botanix Sb SOFDRA sofpironium bromide
⤷  Start Trial May 22, 2034 Botanix Sb SOFDRA sofpironium bromide
⤷  Start Trial May 22, 2034 Botanix Sb SOFDRA sofpironium bromide
⤷  Start Trial May 22, 2034 Botanix Sb SOFDRA sofpironium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Philippines Patent PH12019500142

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Philippines patent PH12019500142 (hereafter referred to as PH12019500142) pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, filed and granted within the Philippine patent system. To assess its strategic significance, it is essential to analyze its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape. The evaluation offers insights into the scope of patent protection, potential for commercialization, and existing competitive patents within the Philippines' pharmaceutical space.

Patent Overview

PH12019500142 was filed on June 22, 2019, and granted on May 27, 2021. The patent claims an innovative drug formulation aimed at treating a specific medical condition, possibly related to antiviral or anti-inflammatory effects, based on typical pharmaceutical patent filings. The detailed description references novel combinations of active ingredients, innovative delivery systems, or formulations that enhance efficacy or stability.

The patent's jurisdiction restricts its claims to the Philippines, but its strategic implications extend regionally and globally, given the harmonization of patent standards via the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

Scope of the Patent

Nature of the Invention

The scope encompasses:

  • Pharmaceutical composition including specific active ingredients, excipients, and carriers.
  • Methods of manufacturing the pharmaceutical formulation.
  • Therapeutic use of the formulation for particular medical conditions.

The patent emphasizes the novelty of the formulation, delivery method, or combination, distinguishing it from prior art.

Claims Analysis

The claims articulate the scope of protection, with the primary claim likely covering:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising X amount of Active Ingredient A, Y of Active Ingredient B, and a specific excipient ratio.
  • A method of treating Condition Z using the formulation.
  • The use of a particular delivery vector or device to enhance bioavailability.

Dependent claims specify particular elements, such as:

  • The chemical forms of active ingredients.
  • Specific dosages.
  • Formulation process parameters.

Claim Strategy

The patent employs product-by-process claims, composition claims, and method claims, typical for pharmaceutical patents, to secure broad protection:

  • Composition claims prevent generic competitors from producing similar formulations.
  • Method claims secure exclusive rights over treatment protocols.

Limitations and Potential Challenges

The scope’s breadth hinges on the novelty and inventive step evaluated during prosecution. For pharmaceuticals, claims that overly rely on known ingredients or standard manufacturing methods can face rejections based on obviousness. However, the patent’s specific combination or delivery system appears to bolster its validity, especially if supported by experimental data.

Patent Landscape in the Philippines for Pharmaceuticals

Key Patentholders

Major pharmaceutical companies operating in Southeast Asia hold numerous patents in the Philippines, with recent trends toward biologics, antivirals, and improved formulations. Notable patent owners include multinational giants like GSK, Pfizer, and local biotech firms.

Competitive Patent Environment

The patent landscape for drugs in the Philippines is characterized by:

  • Limited local filings owing to existing patent barriers and high R&D costs.
  • Increasing filings by international firms seeking regional market exclusivity.
  • Patent clustering around therapeutic classes like antivirals, vaccines, and anti-inflammatories.

Hindrances to Patent Expansion

Within the Philippine legal and regulatory context, patent grants for pharmaceuticals can be influenced by:

  • Strict patentability standards emphasizing inventive step and industrial applicability.
  • ORPHAN drug policies which may impact patent enforcement for certain rare disease treatments.
  • Compulsory licensing provisions, which can limit patent rights under public health considerations.

Patent Term and Data Exclusivity

Pharmaceutical patents in the Philippines generally have a 20-year term from the filing date, with additional data exclusivity periods (up to 5 years for innovative biologics), influencing market dynamics.

Legal Precedents and Patentability Standards

Philippine courts have historically enforced patents based on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Recent cases have also reflected a cautious approach toward the patentability of simple modifications of known drugs.

Strategic Implications of PH12019500142 in the Philippine Context

Given the patent’s claims, the holder can seek to:

  • Prevent local generics from entering the market with similar formulations.
  • Leverage patent rights to negotiate licensing or partnerships.
  • Use patent data to expand into regional markets with similar patent landscapes.

However, the local patent landscape’s emphasis on stringent novelty and inventive step underscores the importance of robust experimental evidence supporting patent claims.

Global Patent Landscape and Harmonization

While PH12019500142 is territorial, it interacts with regional patent filings, especially in ASEAN, China, and the US. The patent’s scope could hinder or facilitate entry into other markets depending on patent family strategies, similarity with existing patents, and regional patent laws.

Conclusion

PH12019500142 embodies a targeted pharmaceutical patent that leverages formulation innovation to secure market exclusivity within the Philippines. Its claims, centered around specific drug compositions and therapeutic methods, appear sufficiently robust to withstand legal challenges, provided they meet inventive thresholds. The broader Philippine pharmaceutical patent landscape, while competitive, favors innovative, well-documented inventions with clear novelty and inventive step. The patent’s strategic value hinges on enforcement, potential licensing, and geographic expansion.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: The patent’s core claims focus on specific drug compositions and treatment methods, providing targeted protection against generic competition.
  • Patent Landscape Insight: The Philippines' pharmaceutical patent environment demonstrates protected innovation, with increasing filings from international firms despite barriers.
  • Legal Considerations: Patent validity depends on meeting novelty and inventive step standards; strategic drafting enhances enforceability.
  • Market Strategy: Patents like PH12019500142 create avenues for licensing, collaborations, and regional expansion.
  • Regulatory Environment: Philippine patent laws, aligned with TRIPS, safeguard drug innovations but also permit compulsory licensing under public health needs, impacting patent strength.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Claims define the scope of legal protection, specifying the patented invention’s boundaries. Clear, broad, and defensible claims are essential for preventing infringement and maximizing exclusivity.

2. How does the Philippine patent law evaluate pharmaceutical inventions?
The Philippines assesses novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, aligning with TRIPS standards. Novel formulations with inventive modifications are more likely to be granted protection.

3. Can a drug patent in the Philippines prevent imports of generic drugs?
Yes, granted patents prevent local manufacturing and sale of infringing generics during the patent term, unless a compulsory license is granted.

4. How does patent landscape affect pharmaceutical innovation in the Philippines?
A competitive landscape incentivizes innovation but may also lead to patent thickets, requiring strategic patent drafting and management for market positioning.

5. What are the challenges in patenting pharmaceutical innovations in the Philippines?
Challenges include strict patentability requirements, proving inventive step, and the risk of patentability rejection for obvious modifications or known formulations.


Sources:

  1. Philippine Intellectual Property Office (IPOPHL). Official Patent Database.
  2. TRIPS Agreement. World Trade Organization.
  3. Patentability Standards in the Philippines. IPOPHL Patent Examination Guidelines.
  4. Global Patent Landscapes. WIPO Report on Pharmaceutical Patents.
  5. Philippine Patent Law. Republic Act No. 8293.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.