You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Peru Patent: 20130239


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Peru Patent: 20130239

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,552,002 Aug 25, 2029 Helsinn Hlthcare TRUSELTIQ infigratinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Peru Patent PE20130239

Last updated: August 23, 2025

Introduction

Peru patent PE20130239 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with a focus on defined chemical compounds or a novel therapeutic formulation. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, emphasizing its relevance in the global and Peruvian pharmaceutical patent context. Such an evaluation enables stakeholders to appraise the patent’s strength, potential competitive barriers, and opportunities for innovation or IP clearance.


Patent Overview

PE20130239 was granted in Peru, reflecting an inventive step in the pharmaceutical domain, likely related to novel compounds or therapeutic uses. The patent’s filing date, priority date, and grant date are critical for understanding its duration and potential patent life advantage. Typically, Peruvian patents span 20 years from the priority date, offering a substantial period of market exclusivity in Peru.

As of the latest available data, the specific details surrounding PE20130239—such as its title, inventors, applicants, filing basis, and technical disclosure—are integral to contextualize the scope and claims. For detailed legal scope, access to the full patent text is vital, but the following analysis synthesizes common characteristics and strategic implications based on typical pharmaceutical patent structures.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Subject Matter

PE20130239 likely claims a novel chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or therapeutic method. In pharmaceutical patents, the scope generally encompasses:

  • Chemical compounds: specific molecular structures, derivatives, or salts with therapeutic activity.
  • Method claims: specific methods of synthesis, administration, or therapeutic application.
  • Uses and indications: particular medical conditions or diseases addressed by the invention.
  • Formulation claims: specific combinations, excipients, or delivery systems enhancing efficacy or stability.

Protection Limits

The scope’s breadth depends on claim drafting. Patent claims with broad language (e.g., "a compound selected from the group consisting of...") offer extensive protection but risk invalidation if they are overly generic. Narrow claims, focused on specific compounds or methods, carve out more defensible but limited IP rights.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

In typical pharmaceutical patents like PE20130239, the independent claims define the core invention. They might cover:

  • A specific chemical compound with unique structural features and a surprising pharmacological effect.
  • A therapeutic method involving administering a particular compound or formulation.
  • Compositions comprising the claimed compound with known excipients.

The language often emphasizes the novelty, inventive step, and unexpected efficacy or safety attributes. For example:

"A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, and R3 are...," or "A method of treating XYZ comprising administering an effective amount of compound I to a subject."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims elaborate on the independent claims, introducing specifics such as:

  • Variations in stereochemistry.
  • Specific dosage forms.
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Treatment of particular patient populations.

This layered claim structure broadens patent coverage and provides fallback positions during possible legal challenges.

Claim Strategy and Validity Considerations

The scope and wording directly influence patent validity and enforceability:

  • Novelty: Claims must define features not present in prior art.
  • Inventive step: Claims should include inventive features that are non-obvious.
  • Utility: The claims often specify the therapeutic benefit, reinforcing patent utility.
  • Clarity: Well-defined claims limit infringement disputes.

Patent Landscape in Peru and Globally

Peruvian Patent Environment

Peru’s pharmaceutical patent landscape aligns with IP standards in Latin America but is characterized by:

  • Strict examination standards: Ensuring that only truly novel inventions receive patent protection.
  • Compulsory licensing provisions: Allowing government intervention under certain conditions, which can impact patent enforceability.
  • Limited local R&D: Most patent applications involve imports or incremental modifications rather than groundbreaking inventions.

Key Competitors and Similar Patents

A review of equivalent patents reveals:

  • Similar compounds or formulations patented in major markets like the US, EU, or China.
  • Some patents focus on proprietary synthesis methods or specific therapeutic uses, overlapping with PE20130239.
  • Prior art largely consists of known pharmacologically active compounds, underscoring the importance of claiming inventive steps and specific chemical modifications.

International Patent Family and Patent Strategy

Given the global relevance, patent applicants for PE20130239 likely pursued patent protection across jurisdictions such as the US (via USPTO), Europe (EPO), China (CNIPA), and regional patent offices. A robust patent family offsets regional legal variances and secures market exclusivity.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent enforceability depends on accurate claim language, compliance with patentability requirements, and strategic prosecution. The Peruvian patent law (Law No. 29459) emphasizes inventive step and industrial application, making claim drafting crucial for robust protection.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical developers: The scope indicates promising coverage for the specific compound/method, but overlapping prior art could threaten broad claims.
  • Generic manufacturers: Should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments based on the patent’s claims.
  • Legal practitioners: Need to analyze claim scope in light of prior art and patent validity, considering potential for patent challenges or licensing.

Conclusion and Recommendations

PE20130239 exemplifies a strategic effort to protect innovative pharmaceutical inventions within Peru. The key to leveraging or navigating this patent lies in:

  • Monitoring the claims’ breadth: To assess potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate.
  • Understanding the patent landscape: Both locally and internationally, to identify patent overlaps.
  • Evaluating the patent’s enforceability: Considering claim specifics and prior art.

Developing clear, well-defined, and enforceable claims remains crucial. Continuous landscape surveillance and patent analytics enable stakeholders to optimize IP strategies, license-in or license-out opportunities, and R&D directions.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope assessment: The patent likely covers specific chemical entities or therapeutic methods, with claim language central to its enforceability.
  • Claim strategy: Broad claims risk invalidation; narrowly drafted claims may provide more robust protection.
  • Patent landscape awareness: Similar patents globally necessitate careful freedom-to-operate analyses in Peru and beyond.
  • Legal environment: Peruvian law emphasizes novelty and inventive step, influencing patent prosecution and potential challenges.
  • Strategic IP management: A multi-jurisdictional patent portfolio enhances market exclusivity and competitive positioning.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of Patent PE20130239?
    It likely covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic method, emphasizing novelty and inventive features related to treatment.

  2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
    Claims can range from narrow (specific compounds and uses) to broad (chemical class or therapeutic concept); the scope depends on strategic drafting.

  3. What challenges could threaten the patent’s validity?
    Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or overly broad claims that overlap with existing patents can jeopardize validity.

  4. Can similar patents be filed in other jurisdictions?
    Yes. Applicants commonly file patent families across multiple regions, including the US, EU, and China, to maximize protection.

  5. How does the Peruvian patent landscape impact pharmaceutical innovation?
    It balances encouraging innovation with access considerations, emphasizing novelty, utility, and inventive step, which can influence R&D investments and patent strategies.


References

[1] Peruvian Law No. 29459, “Law of Patents,” available at the Peruvian Ministry of Justice.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) – Patent Data Reports.

[3] European Patent Office (EPO) – Patent Landscape Reports.

[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – Patent Search Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.