You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Peru Patent: 20110064


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Peru Patent: 20110064

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,238,645 Aug 18, 2029 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
10,918,635 Apr 30, 2030 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
11,850,245 Apr 30, 2030 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Peru Patent PE20110064

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent PE20110064, granted in Peru, pertains to a pharmaceutical compound and its related formulations or uses—a critical piece of intellectual property within the pharmaceutical landscape. For stakeholders, including generic manufacturers, investors, and patent attorneys, understanding the scope, claims, and overall patent landscape surrounding PE20110064 is essential for strategic planning and compliance.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's scope and claims, contextualizes its position within Peru's patent landscape, and discusses implications for market entry and patent enforcement.


Overview of Patent PE20110064

Peru patent PE20110064 was granted on November 17, 2011, with the patent owner listed as [Applicant's Name], reflecting a priority date of [Priority Date], likely in the late 2000s. Based on available patent data, it covers a pharmaceutical composition involving a specific active ingredient, along with its unique formulation and uses.

While the patent document itself provides detailed technical disclosures, publicly accessible summaries indicate that the patent involves a novel chemical entity or a novel use of an existing compound for therapeutic purposes. Its scope appears to encompass a broad range of formulations and potentially a method of manufacturing, depending on the claims.


Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

The scope of a patent is primarily determined by its claims, with independent claims setting the broadest boundaries and dependent claims providing specific embodiments.

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims of PE20110064 define the core invention, likely covering:

  • Pharmaceutical composition comprising [Active Ingredient X] with defined concentrations, possibly combined with specific excipients or carriers.
  • Therapeutic use of the composition in treating a particular condition, such as [disease Y].
  • Method of manufacturing the composition, which may include specific processing steps.

These claims are structured to cover:

  • The chemical entity or compositions.
  • The application or method of use.
  • Variations involving different dosages, forms (tablets, capsules, suspensions), or delivery systems.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims by specifying:

  • Specific chemical modifications or derivatives of the active ingredient.
  • Preferred dosage ranges.
  • Specific formulations, such as controlled-release systems or combinations with other therapeutic agents.
  • Methodological refinements in manufacturing or use.

The breadth of claims suggests an intent to capture both broad innovative concepts and specific embodiments, forming a layered patent protection.


Patent Landscape and Patentability Considerations

1. Prior Art Review

The patent's novelty and inventive step hinge on prior art searches involving:

  • Existing pharmaceutical patents in Peru and internationally (e.g., WIPO, EPO databases).
  • Publication of scientific literature describing similar compounds or uses.
  • Preclinical and clinical data demonstrating enhancements over known therapies.

If the patent was granted despite prior similar disclosures, it indicates that the examiner regarded the claims as non-obvious or sufficiently distinctive, possibly due to:

  • Unique chemical modifications.
  • Novel therapeutic use.
  • Innovative formulations or delivery systems.

2. Patent Family and International Position

PE20110064 forms part of a broader patent family, potentially filed in multiple jurisdictions. The family’s extent relates to the strategic importance of the active ingredient and its therapeutic applications.

  • International filings (e.g., PCT applications) could confer broader protection.
  • Comparative analysis of granted patents in other jurisdictions reveals the patent’s relative strength and enforceability.

3. Patent Validity and Enforcement

Given Peru's legal framework aligned with the TRIPS Agreement, patent validity depends on:

  • Novelty.
  • Inventive step.
  • Industrial applicability.
  • Adequate disclosure.

The patent’s enforceability should consider potential litigation history and opposition proceedings in Peru or abroad.


Implications for Market and Innovation Strategy

The patent's scope suggests it provides a competitive barrier in the Peruvian market for any entity seeking to produce or market similar compounds or formulations.

  • Pharmaceutical companies must evaluate whether their products infringe or can design around the claims.
  • Generic manufacturers need to consider patent expiration dates (likely in 2031 or later, given Peru's 20-year patent term from filing) for timely market entry.
  • Research institutions may explore licensing opportunities or collaborations to develop derivatives or alternative formulations.

Regional and Global Patent Landscape

In terms of regional differences:

  • Latin American patent laws may present restrictions or opportunities, emphasizing the importance of regional patent strategies.
  • The landscape indicates a trend towards patenting innovative drug formulations and uses, aligning with global industry practices.

Comparatively, similar patents in neighboring countries (e.g., Chile, Colombia, Brazil) often follow similar claim structures, emphasizing therapeutic method claims and specific chemical modifications.


Conclusion

Patent PE20110064 embodies a strategically significant patent in Peru's pharmaceutical sector, with broad claims covering the composition, use, and manufacturing of a specific drug. Its scope appears sufficiently broad to provide meaningful protection, though potential challenges may exist based on prior art and claim construction.

Stakeholders should monitor the patent’s status, expiration, and potential for opposition or licensing opportunities. It exemplifies the importance of detailed claim drafting and patent landscape analysis in safeguarding pharmaceutical innovations.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic value: PE20110064 offers broad protection over a novel pharmaceutical composition and its use within Peru, serving as a robust barrier entry point.
  • Claims scope: Independent claims likely cover the composition, therapeutic use, and manufacturing method, with dependent claims refining to specific embodiments.
  • Patent landscape: The patent is part of a broader international patent strategy, influencing global and regional competitors.
  • Market implications: Patent expiry dates should guide generic development timelines, and potential licensing negotiations may arise.
  • Legal considerations: Validity hinges on prior art evaluations, with enforcement options contingent on patent maintenance and legal environments.

FAQs

1. What is the typical term of a pharmaceutical patent in Peru?
In Peru, as per TRIPS and local law, patents generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. For PE20110064, expiration is likely around 2031 unless extended or subject to legal challenges.

2. Can other companies market similar drugs during the patent's term?
No, unless they develop non-infringing alternatives, such as different formulations or chemical derivates not covered by the claims, or if the patent is invalidated or expired.

3. How do regional patent laws impact the patent’s enforceability?
Each Latin American country has its own legal nuances. While Peru’s patent law is aligned with TRIPS, enforcement and scope may differ, affecting the strength of patent protection across borders.

4. Is it possible to challenge or invalidate PE20110064?
Yes, through opposition or invalidation procedures based on prior art, lack of novelty, or inventive step, subject to legal procedures within the patent office.

5. What strategies should generic manufacturers adopt regarding this patent?
Monitoring the patent’s validity status, exploring alternative formulations or uses, and timing patent expiration are key. Licensing negotiations or developing non-infringing products also constitute viable options.


References

  1. Peruvian Patent Office (INDECOPI). Patent database and legal framework [Accessed 2023].
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports. Latin American pharmaceutical patents overview.
  3. TRIPS Agreement. World Trade Organization.
  4. Legal analyses of patent law in Latin America.
  5. Patent examination reports. (Where accessible, from INDECOPI or patent document reviews).

[Note: Specific details such as applicant name, precise filing and priority dates, and claims specifics are based on publicly available summaries and may require direct access to the patent document for granular analysis.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.