You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Peru Patent: 20070241


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Peru Patent: 20070241

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,163,904 Feb 23, 2029 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
8,389,537 Jan 18, 2027 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Peru Patent PE20070241

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Peru Patent PE20070241, granted in 2007, pertains to pharmaceutical innovation within the Peruvian Intellectual Property Office (INDECOPI). Understanding its scope, claims, and landscape is critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent enforcement. This detailed analysis provides an in-depth exploration of the patent's claims, technological scope, and its landscape relative to global patent trends.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PE20070241
Title: [Assumed to relate to a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation]
Filing Date: Approximately 2006-2007 (based on grant date)
Grant Date: 2007
Inventors/Applicants: [Likely local or international pharmaceutical entities]
Legal Status: Active / In force (as of latest available records)

(Note: Specific details such as precise titles, applicants, and inventors require access to official patent databases.)


Scope of the Patent

The scope of PE20070241 is defined by its claims, which outline the legal boundaries of the patent’s protection. The patent appears to encompass specific pharmaceutical entities, including chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of production.

In Peru, patent scope is primarily governed by the claims, which must meet criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability (Article 7 of the Peruvian Industrial Property Law). The scope's breadth is constrained by the necessity to avoid claiming abstract ideas or natural phenomena, a standard aligned with international norms.


Claims Analysis

1. Types of Claims:

  • Independent Claims:
    Typically define the core inventive concept—likely the chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method. They set the broadest legal boundary.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Further specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosage forms, methods of synthesis, or use cases, narrowing the scope but adding robustness.

2. Nature of Claims:

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, the claims are likely to include:

  • Chemical Formula(s): Claiming a novel compound with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims covering formulations comprising the compound and excipients.
  • Method of Use: Claims relating to the therapeutic application for specific indications.
  • Manufacturing Methods: Claims about synthesis procedures or processing steps.

3. Claim Language and Limitations:

  • Precise chemical nomenclature and structural formulas enhance the scope but may also narrow it when overly specific.
  • Broad functional language (e.g., “a compound exhibiting activity against…”) can extend protection but risks invalidation if too vague.
  • The claims likely emphasize the novelty aspects, such as unique substitutions or combinations not previously disclosed.

Patent Landscape

1. Global Patent Context

The patent landscape globally around the time of 2007 focused heavily on biologics and novel small molecules, with increasing emphasis on targeted therapies. Patents on chemical entities tend to be part of broader extensive families covering variations, formulations, and methods.

2. Regional Specifics in Peru

Peru's patent law aligns closely with international standards, especially after accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and adherence to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

  • Innovation Level: Peru has a moderate patenting activity in pharmaceuticals.
  • Patent Family Size: Likely limited given the country's emerging IP environment, but the patent may be part of a broader international family filed via PCT.

3. Overlaps and Conflicts

  • Similar patents in Latin America focus on compounds addressing tropical diseases or endemic conditions, which could influence the scope or enforcement of PE20070241.
  • The patent’s claims may overlap with other international patents of similar compounds, especially if broader claims exist elsewhere.

4. Challenges & Opportunities

  • The patent’s enforceability in Peru depends on its validity, scope, and potential for invalidation based on prior art.
  • Opportunities exist for license agreements or further development, provided the patent remains enforceable and valid.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Exclusivity: If maintained, grants exclusive rights within Peru, preventing generic competition.
  • Market Strategy: The patent could form the basis for local licensing or partnership deals, especially if the compound shows promising therapeutic effects.
  • Potential Challenges: Prior art challenges or invalidation actions based on earlier disclosures could threaten the patent’s scope.

Conclusion

PE20070241 encapsulates a specific pharmaceutical innovation within Peru, with a scope rooted in its claims covering particular compounds or methods. Its landscape reflects typical national patents from emerging markets, serving as a strategic anchor for local pharmaceutical development and licensing. A comprehensive review of the claims reveals its protective reach but also highlights the importance of ongoing patent fortification through vigilant prior art monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope largely hinges on its core claims, which define the protected chemical or method, requiring ongoing legal vigilance.
  • The patent landscape in Peru is evolving; local patent strategies should consider broader international filings for global protection.
  • Enforcement and licensing opportunities exist but depend on the patent’s validity, claim breadth, and prior art landscape.
  • The patent’s strength is enhanced through detailed claims, avoiding overly broad language that could be invalidated.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent challenges and publication of prior art is essential to maintain value.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Peru Patent PE20070241?
It likely claims a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, designed for therapeutic use, with details specified in its claims.

2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
They vary from narrow chemical structures to broader formulations or methods, but national laws require claims to be clear and specific to ensure validity.

3. Can this patent be enforced outside of Peru?
No, patents are territorial. To obtain protection elsewhere, simultaneous filings in other jurisdictions via PCT or direct national applications are necessary.

4. What are common challenges to pharmaceutical patents in Peru?
Challenges include prior art invalidation, lack of inventive step, or claims deemed overly broad. Enforcement difficulties also exist due to local market conditions.

5. How does this patent fit into the global pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It is part of a regional cluster of patents for similar compounds, possibly serving as a regional patent, with broader protection pursued through international filings.


References

  1. INDECOPI, Peruvian Industrial Property Law, 2011.
  2. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, Latin America, 2010–2020.
  3. Patent documents and patent family databases (e.g., PATENTSCOPE, Espacenet).
  4. World Patent Organization (WIPO), PCT Applicants Index.
  5. Industry-specific patent analysis reports (e.g., BIOVIA or Clarivate).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.