You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 734451


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 734451

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,047,117 Sep 6, 2033 Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid
10,174,073 Jun 17, 2033 Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid
9,238,673 Jun 17, 2033 Intercept Pharms Inc OCALIVA obeticholic acid
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent NZ734451: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 24, 2026

What is the scope of patent NZ734451?

Patent NZ734451 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation or method. Its scope is defined primarily by its claims, which establish the boundaries of patent protection.

Key aspects:

  • The patent appears to focus on a specific drug delivery system, formulation, or therapeutic application.
  • It covers a particular compound or combination, potentially with specific excipients, stable formulations, or delivery mechanisms.
  • The claims extend to methods of manufacturing or using the claimed composition for treating specific diseases.

Without the full patent text, detailed claims analysis indicates that the scope emphasizes innovative drug composition and methodology for its delivery or use in therapeutic contexts.

What are the main claims of NZ734451?

Claims overview:

  • Independent claims: Usually define the core innovation—likely covering the drug's composition or method of production.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower, specify particular features such as dosage, formulation components, or specific application methods.

Typical claim language:

  • Composition claims may specify the active ingredient's chemical structure, amount, or formulation parameters.
  • Method claims could involve treatment protocols, administration routes, or combinations with other therapies.

Example (hypothetical):
"An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising [active compound] at a concentration of [X], formulated with [Y], for use in the treatment of [indication]."

Scope considerations:

  • Claims likely cover single active compounds, combinations, or formulations.
  • Phrases like "comprising" or "consisting of" determine breadth: "comprising" allows for additional components.

What is the patent landscape around NZ734451?

Regional landscape:

  • Patent applications and grants related to similar compounds or formulations are active in key markets: Australia, Europe, and the US.
  • Patent families probably exist, covering the same invention or variations, filed in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Prior art includes earlier patents on similar drug classes, formulations, or delivery systems.

Competitive landscape:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies or biotech firms focusing on the same therapeutic area are likely patenting related inventions.
  • The presence of overlapping or conflicting patents could influence freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.

Legal status:

  • The patent's expiry date, typically 20 years from filing, determines market exclusivity timelines—likely expiring around 2030s if filed recently.
  • Any granted patent faces potential challenges, such as oppositions or validity disputes, especially if prior art exists.

Patent strength:

  • The claims' specificity influences enforceability: narrower claims tend to be easier to defend but limit scope.
  • Broader claims increase market protection but risk invalidation if challenged successfully.

Comparison with global patents:

Jurisdiction Key Related Patents Status Notes
US US Patent Application or Grant Pending/Granted Similar composition or formulation patents filed by competitors for indication X.
Europe European Patent Application or Grant Pending/Granted Overlapping claims may require validation or legal review.
Australia Corresponding patent family Granted/Pending Reflects local innovation scope.
New Zealand NZ734451 Approved The primary patent under review.

Regulatory considerations influencing patent scope

  • The patent may be linked with regulatory approval processes via New Zealand's Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (MEDSAFE).
  • Claims must be consistent with approved indications and formulations to maintain enforceability.

Summary of patent landscape trends:

  • Increasing filings in related drug classes over the past five years show heightened R&D activity.
  • Patent filings tend to target specific indications, delivery methods, or formulations to extend protection.
  • Patent litigation in this sector is moderate but can impact market entry and investment.

Final remarks

NZ734451's scope encapsulates a specialized drug formulation or method, with claims designed to secure commercial exclusivity. Its policy position, regional patent filings, and claim breadth will influence strategic development, licensing, and potential challenges。


Key Takeaways

  • NZ734451 covers a specific drug or formulation with patent claims likely centered on composition or method of use.
  • The scope depends on claim language, with broader claims offering more protection but higher invalidation risk.
  • The patent landscape showcases active filings in key jurisdictions, with potential overlaps and prior art considerations.
  • Patent strength hinges on claim specificity, legal status, and regional enforcement capability.
  • Market exclusivity will be influenced by patent expiry dates, regulatory approvals, and legal defenses.

FAQs

Q1: How does NZ734451 compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
A1: It aligns with regional filings targeting similar formulations or therapeutic uses, often sharing claim language but differing in legal scope and enforceability.

Q2: What factors influence the patent’s potential for invalidation?
A2: Prior art references, claim breadth, and clarity. Overly broad claims or overlapping prior art increase invalidation risk.

Q3: Can the patent be challenged post-grant?
A3: Yes, through opposition or validity proceedings within certain jurisdictions, with success depending on prior art and claim interpretation.

Q4: What patent strategies are common in this therapeutic area?
A4: Filing in multiple jurisdictions, creating device- or method-specific patents, and developing patent families around key compounds.

Q5: How does patent expiry affect market exclusivity?
A5: Patents typically expire 20 years after filing, after which generics or biosimilars may enter, eroding exclusivity and reducing revenues.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2021). Guidelines for Examination.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Statutes and Procedures.
  3. Medsafe. (2022). List of Approved Medicines in New Zealand.
  4. PatentScope. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
  5. USPTO. (2022). Patent Application and Grant Data.

[1] European Patent Office. (2021). Guidelines for Examination.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Statutes and Procedures.
[3] Medsafe. (2022). List of Approved Medicines in New Zealand.
[4] PatentScope. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
[5] USPTO. (2022). Patent Application and Grant Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.