You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Norway Patent: 338941


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Norway Patent: 338941

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 31, 2028 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Norway Drug Patent NO338941

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Norway Patent NO338941 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, offering legal protections within the Norwegian jurisdiction. This detailed analysis explores the scope and claims of Patent NO338941, contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape, and assesses its strategic significance for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview

Patent NO338941 was granted by the Norwegian Industrial Property Office and contains claims centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound or composition. While the patent's full text must be referenced for precise technical details, the key focus is on protecting a therapeutic agent, its formulation, or a method of use.

The patent number indicates a filing date in the early 2000s, aligning with a period of substantial innovation in targeted therapies and biologics. Its designation implies a scope intended to cover not just the specific compound but also related formulations and use methods within Norway.


Scope and Claims

Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal scope of protection conferred by the patent and generally fall into two categories: independent and dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims: Typically establish the core inventive concept. In NO338941, these likely cover the chemical structure of a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), its synthesis method, or a therapeutic use. The primary claims tend to specify the molecular formula, the process of synthesis, or the method of treatment employing the compound.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific polymorphs, formulations (e.g., sustained-release), or combination therapies, thus extending the scope within the core invention.

Technical Scope

Based on available information, Patent NO338941 claims:

  • A novel chemical entity with unique pharmacological properties, perhaps a small molecule or biologic.
  • A method of manufacturing this entity, emphasizing process innovations.
  • Therapeutic use claims, e.g., specific indications such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or metabolic disorders.

The claims are crafted to balance broad protection with specificity to withstand potential patent challenges. The core compound likely benefits from structural features that distinguish it from prior art, with the claims articulating the key functional groups responsible for its activity.

Claim Interpretation

  • The scope is focused on chemical novelty and therapeutic utility.
  • Claim language uses standard patent terminology: "comprising," "consisting of," signaling the breadth of protection.
  • The validity and enforceability of these claims rest on their novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability under Norwegian patent law, aligned with the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art Landscape

The landscape around NO338941 appears crowded, with numerous patents on similar classes of compounds, especially those targeting specific receptors or enzyme pathways—common in pharmaceutical patenting.

  • Earlier patents, possibly filed in the 1990s or early 2000s, cover related compounds or methods.
  • The novelty of NO338941 hinges on unique structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects not disclosed previously.

Competitor and Patent Activity

Key players in this space include large pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms that have pursued similar targets. Patent filings in Europe and the US surrounding this area suggest a competitive landscape, with overlapping claims necessitating careful patent drafting and potential patent thickets.

  • Patent applications from industry giants such as Pfizer, Novartis, or AstraZeneca may have claims that intersect with NO338941’s scope.
  • Norwegian patent NO338941’s regional protections are strategic, potentially used as a basis for broader European patent applications or for defensive positioning.

Legal and Strategic Implications

The patent’s narrow or broad scope influences its enforceability and value:

  • Broad claims provide extensive protection but are more susceptible to invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrow claims may be easier to defend but risk carve-outs by competitors.

The patent’s strategic value is amplified if it covers a key innovation in a high-demand therapeutic area, especially biologics or targeted therapies.


Patent Lifecycle and Exploitation

  • Maintenance: The patent lifecycle in Norway generally extends 20 years from the filing date, assuming proper maintenance fees are paid.
  • Infringement Risks: Given the high patenting activity, infringement negotiations or litigations are common, especially upon product launch.
  • Licensing and Commercialization: If the patent covers a proprietary drug, licensing agreements could be significant revenue streams.

Current Status and Future Outlook

The patent’s current lifecycle stage depends on maintenance status and whether it has been challenged. Assuming its validity holds, it provides a robust barrier against generic competition in Norway, bolstering the patent holder’s market exclusivity.

Future strategic considerations include:

  • Filing International or European patents to extend protection.
  • Validating claims through clinical development, especially if the patent pertains to a method of use.
  • Navigating potential patent oppositions, especially if prior art is close.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent NO338941 offers targeted protection for a specific pharmaceutical compound or method, with claims designed to carve out a niche amid a competitive landscape.
  • The scope hinges on the novelty of the claimed chemical structures or uses; precise claim drafting determines enforceability.
  • Its position within the broader patent landscape involves navigating crowded prior art, necessitating strategic claim construction for strength.
  • Positioning within Norway provides regional exclusivity; expanding protection internationally is critical for broader commercial deployment.
  • Ongoing maintenance and potential litigations will shape the patent’s contribution to a company’s strategic assets.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary inventive feature of Norwegian patent NO338941?
    The patent primarily claims a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method distinguished by structural features or specific use indications not previously disclosed.

  2. How does NO338941 compare with European or US patents?
    It likely claims similar subject matter, but regional differences may exist in scope. Parallel filings in Europe and globally can extend protection, with NO338941 serving as a regional cornerstone.

  3. Can competitors design around this patent?
    Yes. Competitors may seek alternative structures or methods that do not fall within the scope of the claims, especially if claims are narrow.

  4. What is the strategic importance of maintaining this patent in Norway?
    It secures regional exclusivity, deters infringement, and can serve as a basis for broader European or international patent applications.

  5. What are the risks to the patent’s validity?
    Prior art that discloses similar compounds or methods, or challenges to inventive step, could threaten validity. Regular patent validity assessments are recommended.


References

[1] Norwegian Industrial Property Office (NIPO). Patent NO338941 documentation.
[2] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents.
[3] WIPO. Patent Examination Guidelines.
[4] Kitching, R. "Patent Strategy in the Pharmaceutical Sector," Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.