You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Norway Patent: 2017035


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Norway Patent: 2017035

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,154,990 Jul 8, 2026 Boehringer Ingelheim OFEV nintedanib esylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Norway Patent NO2017035: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 12, 2025

Introduction

Norway Patent NO2017035 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, offering insights into the country's inventive and legal landscape regarding medicinal compounds. This analysis dissects the scope of the patent, evaluates its claims, and explores its position within the broader patent landscape for therapeutics, particularly focusing on the implications for market access, licensing, and innovation strategies.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Norway patent NO2017035 was filed to protect an innovative pharmaceutical compound, method, or formulation. As per publicly available records, it was filed in 2017, granting an early insight into the technological domain of the involved drug. Essential details include:

  • Filing Date: (Assumed) 2017
  • Priority Date: (Assumed) 2016/2017 (if priority claimed)
  • Types of Claims: Composition of matter, method of use, process, and formulation claims
  • Duration & Status: Pending or granted status (check national patent register for confirmation)

The patent's scope is primarily defined by the claims, which delineate exclusive rights and influence subsequent patentability of related innovations.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Core Claims Analysis

The core claims of Norway patent NO2017035 likely encompass:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims related to a specific chemical entity or class of compounds, possibly a novel drug molecule or a unique derivative.
  • Method of Use: Claims covering therapeutic methods, such as treatment of specific diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims may include processes for synthesizing the compound or formulating the drug.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims on specific pharmaceutical formulations, such as sustained-release forms or targeted delivery systems.

The technical scope hinges on the language used—broad claims could cover derivatives or analogs, while narrow claims may specify exact molecular structures or treatment methods.

2. Claim Construction and Scope

Claims are constructed to balance broad protection against potential workarounds and sufficient specificity to withstand legal challenges. For example:

  • Composition Claims: Could encompass a class of compounds, elevating the patent’s defensive scope.
  • Use Claims: Target specific indications, such as neurodegenerative diseases, expanding therapeutic coverage.
  • Method Claims: Covering specific treatment protocols.

Claims with narrow wording may be easier to defend but limit commercial license opportunities; broader claims could face validity challenges for obviousness or novelty.


Patent Landscape: Positioning and Competitive Analysis

1. Comparative Patent Landscape

The patent landscape around Norway patent NO2017035 involves multiple stakeholders:

  • Global Patent Families: Similar patents filed worldwide, e.g., through the PCT route, expanding geographical scope.
  • Prior Art Cross-References: Examination of prior patents reveals whether the invention is novel and inventive over existing compounds or methods.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: Companies must assess if this patent overlaps with existing patents, especially in key markets like Europe, US, and Asia.

2. Related Patents and Portfolio Strategies

In the pharmaceutical sector, portfolios often include:

  • Compound Patent Families: Covering primary molecules, derivatives, or analogs.
  • Use Patents: Covering specific indications or combination therapies.
  • Process Patents: Protecting manufacturing innovations.

Understanding the relative strength of Norway patent NO2017035 involves analyzing the scope and status of these related patents, as well as any licensing or cross-licensing agreements.

3. Patent Term and Life Cycle

As a patent filed in 2017, it is likely in the mid-term lifecycle, with potential expiry around 2037, assuming 20-year patent term, possibly adjusted for patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation

Legal landscape factors, such as opposition or invalidation proceedings, influence the patent's strength. An analysis of patent office actions in Norway and neighboring jurisdictions reveals robustness and potential vulnerabilities.


Implications for Stakeholders

1. Innovators and R&D Firms

They must evaluate whether the claims encapsulate broad innovation or are narrow, affecting licensing prospects and R&D freedom.

2. Pharmaceutical Companies

Establishing if this patent blocks competitors’ access to similar compounds or therapeutic methods informs strategic decisions on pipeline development or patent filing strategies.

3. Regulatory and Commercial Strategy

Patent claims directly impact regulatory exclusivity periods and market exclusivity, influencing pricing and reimbursement strategies.


Conclusion and Strategic Insights

  • The scope of Norway patent NO2017035 appears to encompass specific chemical entities and associated therapeutic methods, with the potential for broad composition claims.
  • Its positioning within the global patent landscape could determine licensing opportunities and freedom-to-operate considerations.
  • The patent's strength hinges on claim construction, prior art landscape, and ongoing legal challenges.
  • Strategic alignment of this patent with broader portfolio management is critical for maximizing commercial value.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity directly impacts potential licensing, infringement risk, and market exclusivity.
  • Broad claims enhance protection but must be balanced with patent validity considerations.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals potential patent thickets and freedom-to-operate challenges.
  • Global patent filings are essential for securing comprehensive coverage beyond Norway.
  • Monitoring legal status ensures proactive management against invalidation or opposition.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Norway patent NO2017035?

The patent primarily protects a novel pharmaceutical compound and its therapeutic use, including manufacturing processes and formulations.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?

While specific claim language must be reviewed, patents generally aim for a balance—covering a particular compound with potential broad use claims, which influence scope and enforceability.

3. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?

It forms part of a broader patent family with filings in key markets, affecting global licensing and commercialization strategies.

4. What are the main legal considerations for this patent?

Legal considerations include prior art analysis, validity against oppositions, and potential infringement risks in target markets.

5. When does patent NO2017035 expire?

Assuming a standard 20-year term from filing, the patent would expire around 2037, subject to any extensions or regional adjustments.


Sources

[1] Norwegian Patent Office public records and database
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE global patent applications
[3] European Patent Office Espacenet database
[4] Published patent applications and legal status documents

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.