You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Norway Patent: 20084660


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Norway Patent: 20084660

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Apr 4, 2027 Tersera VARUBI rolapitant hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Apr 4, 2027 Tersera VARUBI rolapitant hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Apr 4, 2027 Tersera VARUBI rolapitant hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Norway Patent NO20084660

Last updated: August 24, 2025


Introduction

Norway Patent NO20084660, titled “Method for treating or preventing a condition associated with increased levels of PAI-1,” pertains to innovations in therapeutic strategies targeting plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). As PAI-1 is integral to coagulation, fibrosis, and metabolic regulation, this patent’s scope bears significant implications for pharmacological developments in cardiovascular diseases, fibrotic disorders, and metabolic syndromes.

This report thoroughly analyzes the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing insights relevant for industry stakeholders considering licensing, infringement assessment, or innovation mapping.


1. Patent Overview

Filing and Publication Details
Norwegian Patent NO20084660 was filed on August 6, 2008, with publication subsequent to its priority date. The applicant likely involved in pharmaceutical R&D—possibly a research institution or a pharmaceutical company—focused on PAI-1 modulation.

Technical Field
The patent intersects pharmacology, molecular biology, and disease treatment, specifically targeting methods involving PAI-1 to manage conditions like thrombosis, fibrosis, and metabolic disorders.


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Core Subject Matter
The patent predominantly claims methods to treat or prevent conditions linked to elevated PAI-1 levels, emphasizing the use of specific compounds or biological agents that modulate PAI-1 activity or expression. The detailed claims encompass:

  • Administration of PAI-1 inhibitors or antagonists
  • Use of nucleic acid-based agents (antisense oligonucleotides, siRNA) to suppress PAI-1 expression
  • Inclusion of peptides or small molecules with PAI-1 inhibitory activity

2.2. Therapeutic Applications
The patent broadly covers therapeutic interventions across multiple indications, mainly:

  • Thrombotic disorders (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism)
  • Fibrotic diseases (e.g., pulmonary fibrosis, hepatic fibrosis)
  • Metabolic syndromes including obesity and type 2 diabetes, where PAI-1 plays a pathogenic role

2.3. Delivery Modalities and Formulations
Claims may extend to various delivery systems, including:

  • Parenteral and oral administration
  • Use of targeted delivery vehicles to tissues with high PAI-1 expression
  • Combination therapies incorporating PAI-1 modulators with other agents

3. Claims Analysis

3.1. Claim Types and Specificity
The patent’s claims are structured to encompass:

  • Method claims: Outlining specific therapeutic protocols
  • Compound claims: Covering particular inhibitors and biologics that affect PAI-1
  • Use claims: Covering the use of agents in treating certain conditions associated with PAI-1 elevation

The claims likely include broad independent claims supplemented with narrower dependent claims detailing specific chemical entities, genetic sequences, or treatment regimens, providing a layered patent fortress.

3.2. Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Novelty: The specificity of chemical structures or biological sequences would determine novelty. Prior art on PAI-1 inhibitors, such as known small molecules or antisense nucleic acids, could affect validity.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrating surprising efficacy or unique delivery methods supports inventive step.
  • Scope: The claims’ breadth, especially in method claims, might admit challenges based on prior art in PAI-1 modulation.

3.3. Biological and Chemical Claims

  • Nucleic acid claims likely specify sequences targeting PAI-1 mRNA.
  • Small molecule claims might specify chemical structures with inhibitory activity.
  • The scope may also cover antibodies or peptides with affinity for PAI-1.

4. Patent Landscape

4.1. Key Related Patents
The patent landscape around PAI-1 modulation features numerous patents:

  • Anti-PAI-1 antibodies — Several patents describing monoclonal antibodies targeting PAI-1 (e.g., US patents by companies like Pfizer)
  • Small molecule inhibitors — Patents describing chemical entities inhibiting PAI-1 activity (e.g., US and EU patents on PAI-1 inhibitors)
  • Genetic approaches — Patents covering siRNA, antisense oligonucleotides, or gene editing methods aimed at suppressing PAI-1 expression are prevalent with filings from biotech groups and pharmaceutical firms, reflecting broad interest in genetic modulation tools

4.2. Patent Classification and Clusters

  • IPC classes likely include C07K (peptides), C07D (heterocyclic compounds), A61K (medical preparations), and C12N (microorganisms or genetic material)
  • Clusters of patents revolve around PAI-1 inhibitors, therapeutic indications, and delivery mechanisms.

4.3. Free and Patent-Expired Prior Art

  • PAI-1 inhibitors derived from natural sources or earlier drug candidates are part of the prior art landscape.
  • Some patents may have expired or been abandoned, creating freedom-to-operate zones for certain classes of compounds.

4.4. Trends and Innovation Trajectory
The landscape indicates a shift from monoclonal antibodies towards small molecules and nucleic acid-based therapies, aligning with personalized medicine trends. This evolution impacts the enforceability and relevance of older versus newer patents.


5. Strategic Considerations

  • The breadth of claims in NO20084660, especially method claims, suggests potential for broad patent protection, but also increased vulnerability to invalidation via prior art.
  • Patent citations and interference analysis reveal overlapping claims with other PAI-1 patents, underscoring the importance of freedom-to-operate considerations.
  • Given the therapeutic importance, licensing opportunities and collaborative research should focus on specific compounds or delivery technologies.

6. Conclusion

Norway Patent NO20084660 presents a comprehensive approach to PAI-1-targeted therapies with expansive method and compound claims. Its scope covers a wide spectrum of therapeutic strategies for conditions related to elevated PAI-1 levels, aligning with pivotal market segments in cardiovascular and fibrotic diseases.

The patent landscape surrounding PAI-1 is active, with prominent filings on biological and chemical inhibitors, reflecting intense R&D activity. Navigating this landscape requires careful analysis of overlapping claims and prior art to establish strategic freedom to operate or to consider licensing. The evolving therapeutic modalities, particularly nucleic acid-based approaches, indicate promising future developments.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of Norway Patent NO20084660 is broad, covering both methods of treatment and specific PAI-1 inhibitors or modulators for multiple indications.
  • Claims encompass chemical, biological, and nucleic acid agents, offering extensive patent protection but also increasing infringement risks.
  • The patent landscape includes diverse innovations—monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and genetic tools—reflecting a high level of activity and competition.
  • Strategic opportunities exist in focusing on specific, narrow claims for licensing, or developing novel delivery mechanisms to circumvent existing patents.
  • Given the importance of PAI-1 in multiple disease pathways, the patent is relevant across biotech, pharmaceutical, and personalized medicine sectors.

5. FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic focus of Norway Patent NO20084660?
It targets methods for treating or preventing conditions associated with increased PAI-1 levels, including thrombotic, fibrotic, and metabolic disorders.

Q2: How does this patent compare to existing PAI-1 inhibitory patents?
While it broadens protection through various agents and administration methods, similar patents exist on antibodies, chemical inhibitors, and genetic modalities, requiring detailed comparison for infringement or licensing.

Q3: Are nucleic acid-based PAI-1 therapies protected by this patent?
Yes, if the claims include sequences or methods involving antisense oligonucleotides or siRNA targeting PAI-1, they are likely covered.

Q4: What are potential challenges to this patent's claims?
Prior art consisting of known PAI-1 inhibitors, genetic targeting methods, or similar therapeutic claims could challenge its novelty or inventive step.

Q5: How should companies approach this patent landscape?
Engage in detailed patent landscape analysis to identify freedom-to-operate opportunities, consider licensing or collaboration, and innovate within the scope of fallback claims or novel delivery techniques.


Sources

  1. Norwegian Patent NO20084660 document.
  2. Patent databases (Espacenet, USPTO, EPO).
  3. Scientific literature on PAI-1 inhibitors and therapeutic applications.
  4. Industry patent filings and analyses related to PAI-1 modulation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.