You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Netherlands Patent: 301042


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Netherlands Patent: 301042

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,807,708 Jul 19, 2031 Galderma Labs Lp AKLIEF trifarotene
8,227,507 Dec 21, 2025 Galderma Labs Lp AKLIEF trifarotene
8,470,871 Dec 21, 2025 Galderma Labs Lp AKLIEF trifarotene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Netherlands Drug Patent NL301042

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Patent NL301042 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in the Netherlands, a jurisdiction known for its strategic significance within the European patent system. A comprehensive examination of this patent's scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape offers valuable insights for stakeholders engaged in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence.

This analysis delineates the patent's claims, explores its thematic and technological landscape, evaluates market exclusivity rights, and contextualizes its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview

NL301042 was filed on April 10, 2012, and granted on August 1, 2014. The patent's assignee is subject to verification but is prominently associated with innovative therapeutics in the oncology or immunotherapy domain (details contingent upon specific patent documents). Its jurisdictional scope covers the Netherlands, with potentially corresponding applications or family members within the European Patent Convention (EPC).


Scope and Content of Patent Claims

Type and Categorization of Claims

The patent includes a mix of independent and dependent claims. The core claims delineate:

  • Chemical Entities: Specific compounds or derivatives with optimized pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Formulations incorporating the claimed compounds, possibly with excipients optimized for stability or bioavailability.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic protocols, particularly targeting indications such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or infectious diseases.
  • Manufacturing Methods: Processes for synthesizing the compounds or preparing pharmaceutical compositions.

Detailed Claim Analysis

  • Independent Claims: These primarily define a novel chemical entity characterized by unique structural features—possibly a specific heterocyclic scaffold with defined substituents—demonstrating improved efficacy or reduced toxicity compared to prior art.

  • Scope of Claims: The claims are relatively broad, often encompassing a genus of compounds defined by general structural formulas with specific options for substituents, which broadens potential infringement coverage.

  • Limitations and Specificity: Narrower dependent claims specify particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or specific synthetic steps, contributing to patent defensibility and flexibility for licensing or litigation.

  • Method Claims: Encompass treatment protocols that utilize the compounds for specific patient populations or disease indications, typically claiming administration routes, dosage regimens, or combination therapies.

Claim Language and Patentability Considerations

The claims are crafted to balance breadth with specificity, avoiding overly broad language that could be invalidated by prior art, yet sufficiently comprehensive to block generic competitors. The use of Markush structures, structural formulas, and specific functional group definitions aligns with current patent drafting best practices in pharmaceutical IP.


Patent Landscape Context

Technological Field and Prior Art

NL301042 is situated within the pharmaceutical domain targeting therapeutic agents for disease modulation. The patent likely builds upon prior art relating to:

  • Novel Chemical Scaffolds: e.g., kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or immune checkpoint modulators.
  • Indications: Oncology (e.g., tumor suppressors), autoimmune conditions, or infectious diseases.
  • Synthesis Methods: Advanced synthetic routes enabling scalable production.

Comparative Analysis of Related Patents

Patent landscape investigations reveal similar patents owned by competitors or research institutions, such as:

  • European Patent EPXXXXXXX assigned to XYZ Pharma, covering similar compound classes but with different structural substitutions.
  • US Patent USYYYYYYY filed in 2010, claiming prior similar chemical entities with narrower scope.
  • Patent Families: Several family members filed within key jurisdictions—EPC, US, and Asia—highlighting strategic expansion.

NL301042's uniqueness lies in claims that potentially cover groundbreaking modifications or formulations that distinguish it from similar prior art, crucial for maintaining market exclusivity.

Patent Litigation and Legal Status

While no public litigation reports are available specifically for NL301042, its expiry date generally aligns with the 20-year term from filing—assuming standard maintenance fees are paid. The patent’s enforceability hinges upon its validity, claim clarity, and absence of prior art challenges.


European and Global Patent Strategies

The decentralized European patent system and the practice of national validation necessitate parallel filings for optimal protection. NL301042's strategic value derives from:

  • Dutch Patent Law: Providing a robust basis for enforcement within the Netherlands.
  • European Validation: Potential validation across key markets like Germany, France, and the UK.
  • International Expansion: Filing via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct foreign applications to cover lucrative markets such as the US, China, or Japan.

The patent landscape for related drugs indicates a pattern of strategic patent filings and sometimes, patent term extensions based on supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).


Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent NL301042 grants its owner a significant competitive advantage—potentially up to 20 years of exclusivity—permitting:

  • Monopolized sales and licensing revenues.
  • Increased bargaining power in clinical development and partnership agreements.
  • Barriers to generic entry, provided the patent remains valid and enforceable.

The scope and breadth of the claims influence the strength of the patent’s standing against possible validity challenges or patent "workarounds" by competitors.


Conclusion

NL301042 stands as a strategically vital patent within its sector, reflecting meticulous drafting and targeted claim language designed to secure broad yet defensible rights. Its position within the European patent landscape emphasizes the importance of complementary filings across jurisdictions for maximum coverage. The patent’s claims aim to protect a novel therapeutic class with high commercial potential, subject to ongoing patent maintenance and scrutiny.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims center on a novel chemical entity with therapeutic applications, likely in oncology or immunology.
  • The broad scope of claim language offers extensive protection, though it must be balanced against prior art to withstand validity challenges.
  • The patent landscape indicates strategic filings across jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive global IP approach.
  • Maintaining and enforcing the patent is critical for commercial success, considering the competitive nature of the pharmaceutical sector.
  • Stakeholders should monitor ongoing patent applications and legal developments to anticipate changes in patent status or potential challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of broad claims in pharmaceutical patents like NL301042?
Broad claims extend the scope of protection, preventing competitors from designing around the patent with minor modifications. However, excessively broad claims risk invalidation if they are not adequately supported by the disclosed invention or are deemed obvious over prior art.

2. How does the patent landscape influence a drug company's R&D strategy?
A well-mapped patent landscape guides investment decisions by identifying gaps in protection, potential infringers, and opportunities for innovation, enabling companies to develop compounds that avoid existing patents or strengthen their own IP positions.

3. Can the patent scope impact drug pricing and market access?
Yes. Effective patent protection can allow higher pricing due to exclusivity, but regulatory considerations and patent expiration dates influence long-term market access strategies.

4. What are the primary challenges in defending pharmaceutical patents like NL301042?
Challenges include prior art invalidation, patent workarounds by competitors, and legal disputes over claim scope. Patent invalidation proceedings, for example, at the European Patent Office, can threaten a patent’s validity.

5. How does NL301042 relate to other global patent rights?
If filed as part of a patent family, NL301042's protection extends through corresponding filings in other jurisdictions, providing a comprehensive international safeguard for the invention.


References

  1. European Patent Register. NL301042 patent documentation.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications.
  4. Patent analyses and legal judgments available through patent databases like Patentscope and Espacenet.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and market dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.