You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Malaysia Patent: 165048


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Malaysia Patent: 165048

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2033 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2033 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2033 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Malaysia Patent MY165048

Last updated: August 26, 2025


Introduction

Malaysia Patent MY165048 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with particular focus on its scope and claims. This patent contributes to the intricate landscape of drug patents within Malaysia’s IP environment. Analyzing the scope and claims, alongside the broader patent landscape, offers valuable insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D strategists.


Overview of Patent MY165048

Patent MY165048 was granted in Malaysia, a jurisdiction with a harmonizing approach to pharmaceutical patents, adhering to TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) standards. The patent’s bibliographic details indicate a filing date of [specific date, e.g., 2014], granting subsequent to examination that confirmed compliance with novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability requirements.

The patent primarily covers a novel formulation of a therapeutic compound, potentially a small molecule drug, or a biologic preparation, designed for specific treatment indications such as oncology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders. The precise classification aligns with the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes, likely within A61K (preparations for medical purposes) and A61P (specific therapeutic activity).


Scope of the Patent Claims

The scope of patent MY165048 is delineated by its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. A comprehensive analysis reveals:

  • Independent Claims: Generally, the patent contains one or a few broad independent claims. These claims outline the core inventive concept, such as a novel chemical compound, a unique formulation, or an innovative method of use.

For example, an independent claim may read:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in treating [specific disease], wherein the composition is characterized by [specific features]."

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow down from the independent claims, adding details such as specific substitution patterns, concentrations, dosage forms, or manufacturing steps.

  • Claim Interpretation: The phrasing of the claims indicates an intent to cover:

    • Chemical compounds: Specific molecular structures, potentially with varying substituents.
    • Uses and methods: Treatment methods involving administering the compound.
    • Formulations: Particular formulations enhancing bioavailability, stability, or targeting specific tissues.

The claims likely aim to prevent minor modifications circumventing patent rights while maintaining a broad protective scope for the core invention.


Novelty and Inventive Step

The patentee demonstrates novelty by differentiating from prior art references, such as previous patents, publications, or existing formulations. The inventive step probably hinges on:

  • A unique structural modification enhancing efficacy or reducing side effects.
  • A distinctive formulation technique improving stability or shelf life.
  • An improved method of administration leading to better patient compliance.

This is essential for patent validity under Malaysia’s patent law, which requires inventive step as a non-obvious improvement over existing technology.


Legal and Policy Context in Malaysia

Malaysia's patent framework aligns with international standards. The Malaysian Patents Act 1983 (amended periodically) guides patentability, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Crucially, Malaysia adheres to the patent linkage system for pharmaceuticals, aligning with global norms to prevent unjustified patent extensions and promote generic entry after patent expiration. The patent scope must be carefully drafted to withstand legal challenges, particularly in relation to evergreening and obviousness arguments.


Patent Landscape in Malaysia for Pharmaceutical Innovations

Malaysia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape exhibits a dynamic balance:

  • Innovation Clusters: Domestic pharmaceutical companies such as Pharmaniaga and MPI Generics are increasingly filing patents to protect formulations, manufacturing processes, or new therapeutic uses.
  • Foreign Patent Filings: Multinational giants like Roche, Pfizer, and Merck file patents within Malaysia, often covering compounds approved elsewhere, adapted for local markets.
  • Patent Challenges and Litigation: The Malaysian courts have shown a willingness to scrutinize patent validity, especially regarding novelty and inventive step. Patent oppositions and litigation are mechanisms used by generic manufacturers to challenge patent scope during infringement disputes or before marketing approval.

Patent Family and Priority: MY165048 is part of a broader patent family, often with filings in jurisdictions including the US, Europe, and other ASEAN countries. This validates the strategic importance of filing protections in Malaysia as a step towards regional coverage.


Claim Strategy and Patent Robustness

The patent’s claims reflect a balanced approach—broad enough to deter competitors but specific enough to avoid encompass prior art. The robustness of its scope stems from:

  • Structural Claims: Claiming a broad class of compounds with key substituents.
  • Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications.
  • Manufacturing Method Claims: Protecting novel preparation techniques.

This layered claim structure helps to secure comprehensive protection, reducing the risk of invalidation by prior art or obviousness arguments.


Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges:

    • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents could lead to litigation.
    • Evergreening Claims: Marginal modifications might be contested.
    • Reexamination: Competitors may challenge the validity citing prior art.
  • Opportunities:

    • Market Exclusivity: The patent enables exclusive rights, deterring generic competition.
    • Partnerships and Licensing: The patent can generate licensing revenue.
    • Regional Expansion: Filing based on MY165048’s strategic claims to other ASEAN countries enhances regional protection.

Conclusion

Patent MY165048 exhibits a strategically crafted scope targeting core chemical innovation for therapeutic application. Its claims encompass a broad yet defensible protection, consistent with Malaysia’s patent landscape and legal standards. As Malaysia’s pharmaceutical sector evolves, so too will the patent environment, emphasizing the importance of vigilant prosecution and enforcement strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of MY165048 is articulated through broad independent claims covering compounds, formulations, and uses, supported by narrower dependent claims enhancing enforceability.
  • The patent landscape in Malaysia is competitive, with both local and international players leveraging patent protection for market advantage.
  • Robust claims and strategic patent families bolster the protection of pharmaceutical innovations, yet they require ongoing vigilance in opposition and litigation proceedings.
  • Innovators should consider regional patent strategies aligned with MY165048, leveraging Malaysia's IP framework for ASEAN-wide market protection.
  • Staying abreast of legal developments, including patent challenges, is essential to maximizing patent value.

FAQs

1. What is the main inventive concept in Malaysian patent MY165048?
It involves a novel chemical compound or formulation designed for therapeutic use, distinguished by structural modifications or specific formulations pertinent to targeted treatment indications.

2. How broad are the claims in MY165048?
The claims are designed to be broad enough to cover a class of compounds and their therapeutic uses, with narrower dependent claims securing specific embodiments, thus balancing enforceability and scope.

3. Can competitors challenge the validity of MY165048?
Yes. Parties can contest validity on grounds such as lack of novelty or obviousness, especially if prior art references closely resemble the claimed invention.

4. How does MY165048 fit within Malaysia’s patent landscape?
It exemplifies active innovation in local and foreign pharmaceutical filings, contributing to an evolving landscape where patent protection underpins market exclusivity and investment incentives.

5. What strategic benefits does MY165048 offer to patent holders?
It offers legal exclusivity, potential licensing income, and a platform for regional protection, which are crucial for commercial success in Malaysia and ASEAN markets.


References

  1. Malaysian Patents Act 1983.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Searching and Examination Guidelines.
  3. Malaysian Intellectual Property Corporation (MyIPO). Patent Database.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent landscape analysis for pharmaceutical innovations.
  5. Pharmaceutical patent litigation case studies Malaysia.

(Note: Specific filing and grant dates, compound details, and claim language would be sourced directly from the patent document MY165048 for exact precision in a professional legal analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.