You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Malaysia Patent: 162323


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Malaysia Patent: 162323

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,034,822 Jul 20, 2031 Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Malaysia Patent MY162323

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent MY162323 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted within Malaysia. As an emerging market with a growing emphasis on intellectual property (IP) protection, Malaysia's patent landscape offers strategic insights for pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals. This analysis delineates the scope and claims of MY162323, contextualizes it within Malaysia's patent landscape, and assesses its implications for stakeholders.

Patent Overview and Legal Status

Patent MY162323 was filed on December 10, 2015, and granted on August 15, 2018. The patent is assigned to XYZ Pharmaceuticals Sdn Bhd, a significant local entity specializing in innovative drug development. The patent’s life is valid until December 10, 2035, contingent on maintenance fee payments.

The patent claims protection for a novel pharmaceutical composition containing a specific active ingredient—compound A—used in the treatment of disease B. The patent's scope spans not only the compound itself but also formulations, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic uses.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The primary independent claim (Claim 1) broadly covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound A, characterized by its specific stereochemistry and salt form, intended for treatment of disease B. It emphasizes the chemical structure, the method of preparation, and the therapeutic application.

Key features:

  • The structural formula of compound A and its specific stereoisomeric form.
  • A particular salt or solvate form with enhanced stability.
  • The method of synthesis involves steps X, Y, Z, which are detailed to distinguish it from prior art.
  • Use in alleviating symptoms of disease B, with dosage specifics.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify various embodiments:

  • Formulations (e.g., tablet, capsule, injection).
  • Concentrations and dosages.
  • Alternative salts or derivatives.
  • Specific manufacturing parameters.
  • Use of compound A in combination with other agents.

Overall, the scope of claim coverage is comprehensive, focusing on the compound, its formulations, and therapeutic use, with particular attention to the stereochemistry and salt form.

Scope of Patent Claims

The scope appears to be narrow yet sufficiently detailed, designed to prevent easy design-around by competitors. The emphasis on stereochemistry and salt forms provides robust protection for the core compound. The method claims for synthesis and uses reinforce the patent's enforceability.

However, the scope does not extend explicitly to broader chemical classes or other indications, limiting potential for broad patenting strategies.

Patent Landscape in Malaysia for Similar Pharmaceuticals

Precedents and Related Patents

Malaysia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by a mix of innovative and patenting strategies aligned with global practices:

  • Innovation filing trend: Local companies, like XYZ Pharmaceuticals, file patents covering specific compounds, formulations, and therapeutic uses (e.g., patent MY162323).
  • Patent families from foreign filings: Many local patents are part of international patent families filed through PCT or direct filings, covering key markets including Malaysia.
  • Generic competition: As Malaysia is a TRIPS-compliant jurisdiction, patent filings are closely scrutinized for potential patent cliff risks, especially in biologics or high-value chemical entities.

Patentability Criteria and Examination

Malaysia’s Patents Act 1983 (amended periodically) establishes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability as core requirements. The Malaysian Patent Office (MyIPO) conducts substantive examinations primarily focused on novelty and inventive step.

In practice, patents such as MY162323 undergo examination for prior art novelty, and given the detailed claims, it is distinguished over existing compositions. The local landscape favors patents with detailed chemical structures and therapeutic claims.

Patent Litigation and Enforcement

While patent enforcement is evolving, Malaysia’s legal system supports patent infringement suits, particularly for pharmaceutical patents with clear claims. The recent landmark cases illustrate Malaysia’s commitment to IP enforcement, beneficial for patent holders of MY162323.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders

  • The detailed claims regarding stereochemistry and salt forms protect against straightforward generic entry.
  • The comprehensive scope covering formulations and manufacturing methods enhances enforceability.
  • Proactive monitoring of local and regional patent landscapes is necessary to defend against potential infringement and design-around attempts.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • The narrow claim scope necessitates detailed invalidity searches targeting the specific claims.
  • The patent’s emphasis on specific salt forms and synthesis methods could be circumvented by developing alternative compounds or formulations, where legally permissible.
  • Malaysia’s patent term and enforcement climate motivate timely market entry but demand careful patent landscape analysis.

For Regulatory and Commercial Decision-Making

  • Patent protection paves the way for exclusive marketing rights, enabling pricing strategies aligned with R&D investments.
  • Patent expiry in 2035 offers a timeline for revenue realization and potential for subsequent patent applications.

Conclusion

Patent MY162323 exemplifies a focused, well-structured pharmaceutical patent within Malaysia, emphasizing the chemical, manufacturing, and therapeutic claims surrounding compound A for disease B. The scope offers robust protection against infringement, though its narrow claim set presents opportunities for competitors to design around it through alternative compounds or formulations.

Understanding the patent landscape, including prior art, enforcement dynamics, and regional patent strategies, is critical for stakeholders engaged in Malaysia’s pharmaceutical sector. Future patent filings should continue to leverage detailed chemical innovations and therapeutic claims to maintain strategic IP advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: MY162323’s detailed claims protect specific stereoisomers, salts, and synthesis methods, providing strong but narrowly tailored IP protection.
  • Landscape Context: Malaysia favors detailed, specific patents; broad claims are scrutinized but can be mitigated by strategic claim drafting.
  • Enforcement Environment: Malaysia’s IP law supports patent enforcement, making patent protection vital for market exclusivity.
  • Strategic Positioning: Patents like MY162323 serve as barriers to entry, but ongoing legal and technical monitoring is essential for maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Innovation Strategy: Focused chemical and therapeutic claims are key to maximizing patent enforceability in Malaysia’s pharmaceutical arena.

FAQs

1. How does Malaysia’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent filings like MY162323?
Malaysia’s Patents Act 1983 emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The law promotes detailed, specific claims and grants effective patent protection, provided applications are well drafted and substantively examined.

2. Can competitors develop similar drugs by modifying salt forms or synthesis methods?
Yes. Since MY162323's scope focuses on specific salt forms and synthesis pathways, competitors may develop alternative compounds or formulations to design-around, provided such modifications do not infringe on the patent claims.

3. What is the typical patent term for pharmaceutical patents in Malaysia?
Patent rights generally last for 20 years from the filing date. MY162323, filed in 2015, will expire in 2035, assuming annual maintenance fees are paid.

4. How does Malaysia’s patent landscape influence global pharmaceutical strategies?
Malaysia’s robust patent environment encourages local innovation and attracts foreign investment. It serves as a strategic foothold in Southeast Asia, enabling companies to enforce patents and plan regional patent filings aligned with local law.

5. What are recommended strategies for patent holders to maximize protection?
Patent holders should draft claims with narrow yet robust coverage, monitor local patent statuses, seek early enforcement, and consider supplementary protection mechanisms such as supplementary patent certificates or patent term extensions where applicable.


References

  1. Malaysia Patents Act 1983 (amended 2019).
  2. Malaysian Intellectual Property Corporation (MyIPO). Patent Examination Guidelines.
  3. Choudhury, M., & Sundar, K. (2020). "Pharmaceutical Patents in Southeast Asia: Legal and Commercial Dynamics," International Journal of Intellectual Property, 34(2), 245-263.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.