You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2021008977


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2021008977

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,398,791 Oct 17, 2034 Novartis PLUVICTO lutetium lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan
11,951,190 Nov 12, 2035 Novartis PLUVICTO lutetium lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent MX2021008977: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in the Mexican Pharmaceutical Sector

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent MX2021008977 is a significant intellectual property asset within Mexico's pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent potentially influences market competition, drug development strategies, and licensing opportunities. This detailed analysis dissects the scope, claims, and contextual patent environment surrounding MX2021008977, equipping industry stakeholders with insights for strategic decisions.


Overview of Patent MX2021008977

Patent number MX2021008977 was filed and granted within Mexico's intellectual property framework, likely in accordance with the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) guidelines. While specific publication details necessitate access to patent databases, typical elements include the patent's title, filing date, publication date, applicant information, and the relevant classification.

Assuming the patent relates to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation based on the context, patents in this category generally aim to protect innovative active ingredients, novel synthesis methods, or unique delivery systems.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of MX2021008977 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the extent of legal protection conferred by the patent. Understanding this scope involves analyzing the claims' language, breadth, and boundaries relative to prior Art.

Claims Structure

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core inventive concept—whether a chemical entity, method, or formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Provide specific embodiments, particular features, or narrower embodiments, ensuring robust protection and fallback positions.

Assuming the patent's claims target a novel pharmaceutical compound, the scope likely encompasses:

  • The chemical structure of the active ingredient(s).
  • Specific stereochemistry or isomers.
  • Methods of synthesis or production.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations incorporating the compound.
  • Therapeutic indications and methods of treatment.

Breadth of Claims

The breadth depends on claim wording—whether it uses broad terminology or narrow, specific language:

  • Broad Claims: Cover extensive variants, increasing market protection but risking prior art challenges.
  • Narrow Claims: Ensure enforceability but limit scope.

In the Mexican context, the patent law permits claims to cover chemical compounds, their salts, isomers, derivatives, and methods of use, provided they meet patentability criteria (novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability).


Claim Analysis

Novelty and Inventive Step

To assess validity, claims must be examined against prior art:

  • The claims should specify features that distinguish the compound/formulation from existing equivalents.
  • For example, a unique substitution pattern on a known core structure or a distinctive manufacturing process.

Claim Language Examples

  • Compound claims: "A pharmaceutical compound having the chemical structure of Formula I, wherein R1 is a methyl group, and R2 is a hydroxyl group."
  • Method claims: "A method of treating disease X comprising administering an effective amount of compound I to a patient."
  • Formulation claims: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound I and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

Legal Considerations

Claims must be supported by the description, allowing a person skilled in the art to reproduce the invention. Any broad claim lacking specificity risks invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.


Patent Landscape in Mexico

Existing Patents and Similar Rights

MX2021008977 exists within a vibrant Mexican patent landscape for pharmaceuticals, characterized by:

  • Patent Clusters: Several patents protect innovative compounds, formulations, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Patent Families: International families, especially from the US, Europe, and Asia, influence Mexican patent filings.
  • Prior Art References: Mexican patent examiners consult multiple prior art sources, including previous patents, scientific publications, and patent applications.

Competitive Positioning

The patent's relative strength depends on:

  • Its novelty compared to existing Mexican patents and prior art.
  • The scope of claims relative to other patents.
  • The potential for patent term extension or supplementary protection certificates.

Legal and Market Implications

A robust patent like MX2021008977 enhances market exclusivity, discourages infringement, and can be a bargaining chip in licensing negotiations. Conversely, overly broad or unsupported claims risk invalidation, reducing commercial value.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies: Should evaluate MX2021008977's claims to understand freedom-to-operate and potential infringement risks.
  • Inventors and patent applicants: Need to craft claims with optimal breadth while ensuring support and non-obviousness.
  • Legal practitioners: Must monitor patent validity and enforceability, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses and invalidity searches.

Conclusion

Patent MX2021008977 exemplifies Mexico’s evolving landscape for pharmaceutical innovation, with its scope and claims critically shaping competitive dynamics. Carefully constructed claims that balance broad protection with specificity enhance patent robustness. Continuous landscape analysis, considering prior art and similar patents, is essential for leveraging the patent’s strategic value.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity is paramount: Well-defined claims that specify unique structural or procedural features maximize enforceability.
  • Landscape awareness: Regular analysis of existing patents prevents infringement and identifies licensing opportunities.
  • Claim strategy: Broader claims increase market coverage but risk invalidity; narrower claims ensure strong enforceability.
  • Legal validation: Support in the description and strategic claim drafting protect against invalidation.
  • Continuous monitoring: Patent landscape surveillance helps adapt to evolving legal and technological changes.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical process for patenting a pharmaceutical compound in Mexico?
    The process involves filing an application with IMPI, providing detailed descriptions and claims, undergoing formal examination and prior art assessment, and responding to office actions before grant.

  2. How does Mexico’s patent law define the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
    Mexican patent law allows for patents on new chemical entities, formulations, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic uses, provided they are novel, inventive, and industrially applicable.

  3. What strategies can companies employ to strengthen patent claims for pharmaceuticals?
    Crafting claims that cover core structures, derivatives, and manufacturing processes, supported by detailed descriptions, enhances scope and enforceability.

  4. How can patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical companies in Mexico?
    It assists in identifying potential infringement risks, evaluating licensing opportunities, and guiding R&D to avoid conflicts with existing patents.

  5. What are common pitfalls in patent claims that could jeopardize validity?
    Overly broad claims unsupported by detailed descriptions, or claims that lack novelty, are vulnerable to invalidation or non-enforcement.


References

  1. Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent Application Processes and Requirements.
  2. WIPO. Patentability Requirements in Mexico.
  3. Patent Office Announcements and Examination Guidelines.
  4. Pharmaceutical Patent Landscapes and Trends in Latin America.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.