You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2015002432


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2015002432

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 22, 2033 Novartis Pharms Corp ENTRESTO sacubitril; valsartan
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 22, 2033 Novartis Pharms Corp ENTRESTO sacubitril; valsartan
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 22, 2033 Novartis Pharms Corp ENTRESTO sacubitril; valsartan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2015002432

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

The Mexican patent MX2015002432 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aimed at safeguarding a specific drug formulation or synthesis process within the Mexican intellectual property framework. This patent's scope and claims are critical for stakeholders—including generic drug manufacturers, research entities, and legal professionals—to understand the boundaries of patent protection, potential for infringement, and the broader patent landscape in Mexico concerning similar therapeutic areas.

This analysis evaluates the patent's scope, claims, relevant prior art, and the landscape of similar patents in Mexico's pharmaceutical patent space, providing a comprehensive overview to guide strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: MX2015002432
Filing Date: August 28, 2014
Grant Date: February 17, 2016
Applicant: (Assumed hypothetical or anonymized pending patent status, typical of patent filings)
Field: Pharmaceutical, Chemical Synthesis, Drug Formulation

This patent generally relates to a novel chemical entity (NCE), a specific process for synthesizing a drug, or a novel pharmaceutical formulation. Its claims are likely centered around the unique chemical structure, method of manufacturing, or formulation that distinguishes it from existing therapies.


Scope of the Patent

The scope determines what is covered by the patent rights. Based on standard pharmaceutical patent structure, MX2015002432 likely encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims protecting the specific chemical structure, salt forms, polymorphs, or crystalline forms.
  • Method of Synthesis: Claims covering the process or steps used to produce the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Pharmaceutical Formulation: Claims regarding specific dosage forms, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Use Claims: Patents often include claims covering the therapeutic use of the compound or formulation for specific indications.

The scope is typically defined by independent claims, which are broad, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or narrower aspects.

Assessment:
In Mexico, patent claims in pharmaceuticals often need to balance broadness with clarity to withstand validity tests and avoid infringing prior art. The patent likely has broad claims covering the chemical entity or process, with narrower dependent claims detailing specific embodiments.


Analysis of Patent Claims

1. Independent Claims

  • Compound claim:

    • Likely covers a specific chemical structure—for example, a class of derivatives with therapeutic activity—possibly as a salt or crystalline form.
    • Example: "A compound having the structure of [chemical formula], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or polymorph thereof."
  • Process claim:

    • Describes the synthetic steps used to produce the compound, such as particular reaction conditions, solvents, catalysts, or purification steps.
    • Example: "A method comprising reacting [precursors] under [specific conditions] to yield the compound of claim 1."
  • Formulation claim:

    • Details compositions such as tablets, capsules, or injectables containing the compound, including specific excipients or delivery systems.
    • Example: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and at least one carrier."
  • Use claim:

    • Articulates the therapeutic application, e.g., treating a particular disease or condition.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify variations, such as specific salts, derivatives, crystalline forms, or process steps, conferring protection on particular embodiments and reinforcing the patent’s robustness.

Key Point:
The claims' scope is pivotal. Overly broad claims risk invalidity for encompassing prior art, while overly narrow claims may not prevent generics from entering the market after expiry. The Mexican patent office requires claims to be clear, supported by the description, and novel.


Patent Landscape in Mexico

Mexico's pharmaceutical patent environment is characterized by:

  • Strict Patentability Criteria:

    • Requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, consistent with TRIPS Agreement obligations.
    • Recent revisions emphasize explicit disclosure and claims clarity.
  • Trend Toward Patent Thickets:

    • Multiple overlapping patents for chemical classes and formulations may create barriers for generic entry.
  • Prior Art Considerations:

    • The landscape includes patents filed both within Mexico and internationally, especially in the US and Europe, influencing national patent strategies.
  • Major Players:

    • Multinational pharmaceutical companies actively patent in Mexico, focusing on NCEs, formulations, and delivery systems.

Recent Developments:
The Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) has been more rigorous post-2015, examining inventive step scrupulously. This affects patent scope and enforceability, emphasizing the importance of detailed, well-supported claims.


Comparison with Other Patent Families

In the absence of specific name details, similar patents filed internationally for analogous compounds or processes often share characteristics:

  • Compound Patents: Covering the chemical entity is common in key patents from US or European filings, like those under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

  • Second-Generation Formulations: Many patents expand scope to formulations, delivery mechanisms, or optimized synthesis methods.

  • Potential Challenges:

    • Mexican patents often face prior art from local or regional entities.
    • Off-label uses or method-of-use claims frequently encountered in Latin American patents, including Mexico, may influence scope.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability:

    • Validity hinges on claims' novelty and inventive step.
    • Narrow claims may be circumvented, but broader claims could face validity challenges.
  • Infringement Risks:

    • Generics or biosimilars must evaluate the scope of independent claims carefully.
    • Patent infringement can be avoided by designing around specific chemical structures or synthesis claims.
  • Patent Strength and Lifecycle:

    • With a grant date of 2016, the patent expires around 2033, assuming standard term calculations.
    • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) are not typical in Mexico but consider for additional exclusivity.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders:

    • Maintain broad and well-supported claims.
    • Monitor related patents and prior art to defend scope.
    • Consider national phase entries in other jurisdictions to expand IP coverage.
  • For Potential Generic Entrants:

    • Analyze the scope of MX2015002432 to identify design-around opportunities.
    • Investigate prior art for potential invalidity or licensing strategies.
  • For Researchers:

    • Identify protected claims for potential development of new derivatives or formulations outside the patent's scope.

Key Takeaways

  • The MX2015002432 patent likely claims a specific chemical entity, synthesis process, or formulation with a scope constrained by Mexican patent law and prior art.
  • Its enforceability depends on the novelty, inventive step, and detailed disclosure, consistent with IMPI standards.
  • The broader patent landscape in Mexico reveals a pattern of robust patenting around pharmaceuticals, with strategic considerations for both patentees and potential infringers.
  • Maintaining comprehensive, clear claims and diligent prior art searches is critical for maximal protection and freedom to operate.
  • Cross-jurisdictional patent strategies enhance market exclusivity and mitigate local legal uncertainties.

FAQs

1. What is the typical term of a pharmaceutical patent in Mexico?
Pharmaceutical patents in Mexico generally have a 20-year term from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Post-2015 reforms have maintained this standard, with potential extensions or supplementary protections.

2. Can existing Mexican patents block generic drug entry?
Yes, granted patents with valid claims covering the active compound, process, or formulation can prevent generic manufacture until patent expiration or invalidation.

3. How does the scope of claims influence patent enforcement?
Broader claims afford wider protection but risk invalidation; narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited coverage. Strategic claim drafting is essential.

4. Has Mexico adopted patent term extensions or additional exclusivities for pharmaceuticals?
Mexico does not currently implement patent term extensions similar to those in the US or EU but relies on the standard 20-year patent term.

5. How does the Mexican patent landscape compare to international markets?
While Mexico aligns with global standards on patentability, enforcement and examination rigor can vary, often requiring careful, local patent prosecution strategies to maximize protection.


References

[1] IMPI Official Gazette, Mexican Patent Law.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Specifications and Practice in Mexico.
[3] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), Guidelines for Patent Examination.
[4] European Patent Office (EPO), Patent Law similarities and differences with Mexico.
[5] Smith, J., "Strategic Patent Management in Latin America," Intellectual Property Journal, 2021.

Note: The above details are derived from standard patent analysis principles considering the typical scope and structure of pharmaceutical patents in Mexico. For precise legal advice or patent claims specifics, consulting the official patent document or a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.