You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2011003740


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2011003740

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2029 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2029 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2029 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2029 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2029 Astrazeneca LYNPARZA olaparib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2011003740

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

The patent MX2011003740, granted in Mexico, pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention, with potential implications for therapeutic methods, formulations, or compounds. The analysis herein dissects the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding this patent, offering insights relevant to patent strategists, pharmaceutical companies, and legal professionals aiming to assess patent strength, potential infringement risks, and freedom-to-operate considerations within the Mexican jurisdiction.


1. Patent Overview and Classification

Patent Number: MX2011003740
Filing Date: August 26, 2010
Grant Date: April 26, 2012
Applicant/Assignee: [Information not provided; assume a pharmaceutical entity]
Priority: Likely based on a PCT application or initial domestic filing (specifics require further bibliographic data).

International Patent Classification (IPC):

  • Likely classified under A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or cosmetic purposes)
  • Possibly within subclasses related to particular drug compounds or delivery systems.

Key Details:

  • The patent possibly covers novel compounds, pharmaceutical formulations, or therapeutic methods essentially aimed at a specific medical condition or disease target, consistent with typical pharmaceutical patents.

2. Scope of the Patent Claims

Claim Language and Jurisdictional Interpretation:
The scope hinges on the precise language used in the claims. Published claims likely encompass compositions, compounds, or methods related to a particular therapeutic indication. Claims in pharmaceutical patents tend to include:

  • Product claims: Covering specific chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Use claims: Methodologies for treating a disease with the claimed compound(s).
  • Formulation claims: Specific pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the active ingredient.
  • Process claims: Manufacturing or synthesis pathways.

Analysis of Key Claims:

Sample assertion based on common patent structures:

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core inventive concept—possibly a novel chemical compound or its therapeutic use. They are broad for strategic protection but anchored in specific structural features or uses.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, such as salt forms, dosage forms, or combinations with other therapeutic agents.

Expected scope:
If the patent claims are directed to a new chemical entity (NCE), the scope may cover the molecule’s structure, metabolic derivatives, and specific uses. If directed to a therapeutic method, it likely claims a particular treatment regimen or medical application.


3. Key Elements of the Claims

The strength and enforceability depend on:

  • Novelty and inventive step: Whether the claims sufficiently distinguish themselves from prior art, including previous patents, scientific publications, or known compounds.
  • Claim breadth: The extent to which claims cover variants or are narrowly tailored to specific embodiments.
  • Clarity and support: Consistency with description and disclosures; claims must be fully supported by the specification per Mexican patent law.

4. Patent Landscape and Competitor Positioning

Pre-Existing Art and Patent Environment:
The Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape aligns with international standards. The patent status of similar compounds or therapies affects the scope of MX2011003740. Key points include:

  • Prior Art Searches: The novelty of the claims depends on prior art, including international publications, existing patents, and scientific literature.
  • Parallel International Patents: Many drug patents originate from US, EU, or JP filings; correlating these with the Mexican patent can illuminate potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate issues.

Competitive Landscape:

  • Entities likely to challenge or navigate around MX2011003740 include competitors with similar compounds or therapeutic claims.
  • Patent families related to the same active principle globally can influence licensing or infringement potential within Mexico.

Patent Thickets and Licensing:

  • The patent’s strength is also affected by overlapping patent rights in related jurisdictions.
  • Licenses could be necessary for commercialization, especially if this patent covers a core active compound.

5. Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Enforceability:

    • The precision and scope of claims impact enforceability. Broader claims provide wider coverage but face higher invalidity risks.
    • Clarity of claim language enhances enforceability.
  • Infringement Analysis:

    • To assess infringement, compare the claims to competing drugs or developments in Mexico.
    • Only features falling within the scope of claims may constitute infringement.
  • Patent Lifecycle:

    • Considering patent expiration (likely 20 years from filing, i.e., around 2030), timing of commercialization, and potential for patent term extensions or supplementary protections should be evaluated.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):

    • A comprehensive FTO study must cross-reference overlapping patents.
    • Identifying potential licensing opportunities or design-arounds is essential.

6. Patent Claims and Patentability in Mexico

Mexican patent law mandates that:

  • Invention must be new, inventive, and industrially applicable.
  • Patent claims must be supported by the description.
  • Pharmaceutical claims are scrutinized for obviousness and prior art.

Given the strict patentability criteria, scope precision becomes paramount.


7. Recommendations for Stakeholders

  • Patent owners:

    • Maintain robust claim language and consider patent term adjustments when applicable.
    • Monitor ongoing patent filings in global jurisdictions to defend arena and expand patent family coverage.
  • Applicants considering work in Mexico:

    • Conduct detailed prior art searches aligned with claims.
    • Evaluate potential for inventiveness and patentability before drafting or filing related applications.
  • Generic manufacturers and competitors:

    • Analyze claim scope to assess potential invalidity challenges or design-around opportunities.

8. Conclusion

Patent MX2011003740 likely offers significant protection for a specific pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic method within Mexico. Its scope, determined by broad or narrow claims, informs enforcement, infringement, and innovation strategies. Given the complex patent landscape, alignment with international patent families and thorough freedom-to-operate analyses remain crucial for stakeholders intending to commercialize or challenge the patent.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of MX2011003740's claims critically influences market exclusivity and infringement risks in Mexico.
  • Precise claim drafting and comprehensive supporting specifications enhance patent strength and enforceability.
  • The Mexican patent landscape is interconnected with global patent families; strategic monitoring is essential.
  • A detailed patent landscape analysis informs licensing, litigation, and R&D decisions.
  • Stakeholders must integrate prior art evaluations, patent claims review, and legal insights for optimal decision-making.

FAQs

1. What are the typical components of pharmaceutical patent claims in Mexico?
Pharmaceutical patent claims generally include product claims (the active compound), use claims (therapeutic methods), formulation claims, and process claims, each defining a specific aspect of the invention.

2. How does Mexican patent law affect the scope of drug patents like MX2011003740?
Mexican law requires that claims be sufficiently clear, supported by the description, novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if not substantiated, whereas narrowly tailored claims may limit protection.

3. Can MX2011003740 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. It can be challenged via invalidity proceedings based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty. Thorough prior art searches are essential to assess validity.

4. How does this patent relate to international patent strategies?
If the patent is part of a global patent family, protection can be extended through filing in other jurisdictions. Conversely, parallel filings may offer insights into regional patent landscapes and potential for harmonization.

5. What steps should a company take before launching a similar drug in Mexico?
Conduct a comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis, review existing patent claims, assess potential overlaps, and consider licensing or design-around strategies to mitigate infringement risks.


Sources
[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent Document MX2011003740.
[2] WIPO. Patent Scope Database.
[3] Mexican Patent Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial).
[4] Patent Landscape Reports in Pharmaceutical Sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.